Quantitative Models of the Mechanisms That Control Genome-Wide Patterns of Transcription Factor Binding during Early Drosophila Development

被引:116
|
作者
Kaplan, Tommy [1 ]
Li, Xiao-Yong [2 ]
Sabo, Peter J. [3 ]
Thomas, Sean [3 ]
Stamatoyannopoulos, John A. [3 ]
Biggin, Mark D. [4 ]
Eisen, Michael B. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mol & Cell Biol, Calif Inst Quantitat Biosci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Genome Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Genom Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
PLOS GENETICS | 2011年 / 7卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HOMEOPROTEIN-DNA-BINDING; IN-VIVO; GENE-EXPRESSION; ORDERED RECRUITMENT; CELL-CYCLE; SITES; NETWORK; CIS; SEGMENTATION; SUGGESTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pgen.1001290
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Transcription factors that drive complex patterns of gene expression during animal development bind to thousands of genomic regions, with quantitative differences in binding across bound regions mediating their activity. While we now have tools to characterize the DNA affinities of these proteins and to precisely measure their genome-wide distribution in vivo, our understanding of the forces that determine where, when, and to what extent they bind remains primitive. Here we use a thermodynamic model of transcription factor binding to evaluate the contribution of different biophysical forces to the binding of five regulators of early embryonic anterior-posterior patterning in Drosophila melanogaster. Predictions based on DNA sequence and in vitro protein-DNA affinities alone achieve a correlation of similar to 0.4 with experimental measurements of in vivo binding. Incorporating cooperativity and competition among the five factors, and accounting for spatial patterning by modeling binding in every nucleus independently, had little effect on prediction accuracy. A major source of error was the prediction of binding events that do not occur in vivo, which we hypothesized reflected reduced accessibility of chromatin. To test this, we incorporated experimental measurements of genome-wide DNA accessibility into our model, effectively restricting predicted binding to regions of open chromatin. This dramatically improved our predictions to a correlation of 0.6-0.9 for various factors across known target genes. Finally, we used our model to quantify the roles of DNA sequence, accessibility, and binding competition and cooperativity. Our results show that, in regions of open chromatin, binding can be predicted almost exclusively by the sequence specificity of individual factors, with a minimal role for protein interactions. We suggest that a combination of experimentally determined chromatin accessibility data and simple computational models of transcription factor binding may be used to predict the binding landscape of any animal transcription factor with significant precision.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prediction of genome-wide effects of single nucleotide variants on transcription factor binding
    Pro, Sebastian Carrasco
    Bulekova, Katia
    Gregor, Brian
    Labadorf, Adam
    Bass, Juan Ignacio Fuxman
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [22] Prediction of genome-wide effects of single nucleotide variants on transcription factor binding
    Sebastian Carrasco Pro
    Katia Bulekova
    Brian Gregor
    Adam Labadorf
    Juan Ignacio Fuxman Bass
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [23] Genome-wide DNA binding pattern of the homeodomain transcription factor Sine oculis (So) in the developing eye of Drosophila melanogaster
    Jusiak, Barbara
    Wang, Feng
    Karandikar, Umesh C.
    Kwak, Su-Jin
    Wang, Hui
    Chen, Rui
    Mardon, Graeme
    GENOMICS DATA, 2014, 2 : 153 - 155
  • [24] Genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding sites and their characteristic DNA structures
    Zhiming Dai
    Dongliang Guo
    Xianhua Dai
    Yuanyan Xiong
    BMC Genomics, 16
  • [25] REPA: Applying Pathway Analysis to Genome-Wide Transcription Factor Binding Data
    Patra, Pranjal
    Izawa, Tatsuo
    Pena-Castillo, Lourdes
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 15 (04) : 1270 - 1283
  • [26] Genome-wide prediction of transcription factor binding sites using an integrated model
    Won, Kyoung-Jae
    Ren, Bing
    Wang, Wei
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2010, 11 (01):
  • [27] The ModERN Resource: Genome-Wide Binding Profiles for Hundreds of Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans Transcription Factors
    Kudron, Michelle M.
    Victorsen, Alec
    Gevirtzman, Louis
    Hillier, LaDeana W.
    Fisher, William W.
    Vafeados, Dionne
    Kirkey, Matt
    Hammonds, Ann S.
    Gersch, Jeffery
    Ammouri, Haneen
    Wall, Martha L.
    Moran, Jennifer
    Steffen, David
    Szynkarek, Matt
    Seabrook-Sturgis, Samantha
    Jameel, Nader
    Kadaba, Madhura
    Patton, Jaeda
    Terrell, Robert
    Corson, Mitch
    Durham, Timothy J.
    Park, Soo
    Samanta, Swapna
    Han, Mei
    Xu, Jinrui
    Yan, Koon-Kiu
    Celniker, Susan E.
    White, Kevin P.
    Ma, Lijia
    Gerstein, Mark
    Reinke, Valerie
    Waterston, Robert H.
    GENETICS, 2018, 208 (03) : 937 - 949
  • [28] Genome-wide analysis of mRNA decay patterns during early Drosophiladevelopment
    Stefan Thomsen
    Simon Anders
    Sarath Chandra Janga
    Wolfgang Huber
    Claudio R Alonso
    Genome Biology, 11
  • [29] Genome-Wide Mapping of Boundary Element-Associated Factor (BEAF) Binding Sites in Drosophila melanogaster Links BEAF to Transcription
    Jiang, Nan
    Emberly, Eldon
    Cuvier, Olivier
    Hart, Craig M.
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 2009, 29 (13) : 3556 - 3568
  • [30] Dynamic Analysis of Gene Expression and Genome-wide Transcription Factor Binding during Lineage Specification of Multipotent Progenitors
    May, Gillian
    Soneji, Shamit
    Tipping, Alex J.
    Teles, Jose
    McGowan, Simon J.
    Wu, Mengchu
    Guo, Yanping
    Fugazza, Cristina
    Brown, John
    Karlsson, Goran
    Pina, Cristina
    Olariu, Victor
    Taylor, Stephen
    Tenen, Daniel G.
    Peterson, Carsten
    Enver, Tariq
    CELL STEM CELL, 2013, 13 (06) : 754 - 768