Stem Cell Mobilization and Autograft Minimal Residual Disease Negativity with Novel Induction Regimens in Multiple Myeloma

被引:11
|
作者
Bal, Susan [1 ]
Landau, Heather J. [1 ,2 ]
Shah, Gunjan L. [1 ,2 ]
Scordo, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Dahi, Parastoo [1 ,2 ]
Lahoud, Oscar B. [1 ,2 ]
Hassoun, Hani [2 ,3 ]
Hultcrantz, Malin [2 ,3 ]
Korde, Neha [2 ,3 ]
Lendvai, Nikoletta [2 ,3 ]
Lesokhin, Alexander M. [2 ,3 ]
Mailankody, Sham [2 ,3 ]
Shah, Urvi A. [2 ,3 ]
Smith, Eric [2 ,3 ]
Devlin, Sean M. [4 ]
Avecilla, Scott [5 ]
Dogan, Ahmet [6 ]
Roshal, Mikhail [6 ]
Landgren, Ola [2 ,3 ]
Giralt, Sergio A. [1 ,2 ]
Chung, David J. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Adult Bone Marrow Transplant Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Myeloma Serv, Dept Med, New York, NY 10065 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10065 USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Cell Therapy Lab, New York, NY 10065 USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Hematopathol Serv, New York, NY 10065 USA
[7] Rockefeller Univ, 1230 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Minimal residual disease; Multiple myeloma; Autograft purity; HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY; AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION; STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY; LENALIDOMIDE THERAPY; OPEN-LABEL; DEXAMETHASONE; CARFILZOMIB; BORTEZOMIB; MAINTENANCE; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.04.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care for transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) is the most common triplet regimen for newly diagnosed MM in the United States. Carfilzomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRD) has shown promising efficacy and may supplant VRD. We compared stem cell yields and autograft minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity after VRD and KRD induction. Deeper responses (ie, very good partial response or better) were more common with KRD. Precollection bone marrow (BM) cellularity, interval from the end of induction therapy to start of stem cell collection, and method of stem cell mobilization were similar for the 2 cohorts. Days to complete collection was greater with KRD (2.2 days, versus 1.81 days with VRD), which more often required >= 3 days of apheresis. Precollection viable CD34(+) cell content was greater with VRD, as was collection yield (11.11 x 10(6), versus 9.19 x 10(6) with KRD). Collection failure (defined as <2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg) was more frequent with KRD (5.4% versus .7% with VRD). The difference in stem cell yield between VRD and KRD is associated with the degree of lenalidomide exposure. Age >= 70 years predicted poorer collection for both cohorts. Stem cell autograft purity/MRD-negativity was higher with KRD (81.4%, versus 57.1% with VRD). For both cohorts, MRD-negativity was attained in a larger fraction of autografts than in precollection BM. For patients proceeding to ASCT, the time to neutrophil/platelet engraftment was comparable in the 2 study arms. In summary, our data demonstrate that KRD induces deeper clinical responses and greater autograft purity than VRD without compromising stem cell yield or post-transplantation engraftment kinetics. (C) 2020 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1394 / 1401
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Immune Profiling of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Treated with Quadruplet Induction and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) and Comparison with Achievement of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity
    Bal, Susan
    Zumaquero, Esther
    Ravi, Gayathri
    Godby, Kelly
    Giri, Smith
    Denslow, Ashley
    Perez, Joaquin Bauta
    Zhou, Fen
    Chen, Suki
    Padilla, Megan
    Siddiqui, Amna
    Ubersax, Clare
    Hornsby, Erin
    Costa, Luciano
    Lund, Frances E.
    BLOOD, 2023, 142
  • [22] Controversies in the Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Significance of Minimal Residual Disease Negativity Using Highly Sensitive Techniques
    Biran, Noa
    Ely, Scott
    Chari, Ajai
    CURRENT HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY REPORTS, 2014, 9 (04) : 368 - 378
  • [23] Evaluation of Sustained Minimal Residual Disease Negativity With Daratumumab-Combination Regimens in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Analysis of POLLUX and CASTOR
    Avet-Loiseau, Herve
    San-Miguel, Jesus
    Casneuf, Tineke
    Iida, Shinsuke
    Lonial, Sagar
    Usmani, Saad Z.
    Spencer, Andrew
    Moreau, Philippe
    Plesner, Torben
    Weisel, Katja
    Ukropec, Jon
    Chiu, Christopher
    Trivedi, Sonali
    Amin, Himal
    Krevvata, Maria
    Ramaswami, Priya
    Qin, Xiang
    Qi, Mia
    Sun, Steven
    Qi, Ming
    Kobos, Rachel
    Bahlis, Nizar J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (10) : 1139 - +
  • [24] Controversies in the Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Significance of Minimal Residual Disease Negativity Using Highly Sensitive Techniques
    Noa Biran
    Scott Ely
    Ajai Chari
    Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, 2014, 9 : 368 - 378
  • [25] Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma
    Munshi, Nikhil C.
    Anderson, Kenneth C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (20) : 2523 - 2526
  • [26] Minimal residual disease for multiple myeloma
    Avet-Loiseau, Herve
    Corre, Jill
    HEMATOLOGIE, 2019, 25 : 36 - 39
  • [27] Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma
    Moukalled, Nour
    Malard, Florent
    Bazarbachi, Ali
    Mohty, Mohamad
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 2025, 54 (01):
  • [28] Impact of Clinical Parameters and Induction Regimens on Peripheral Blood Stem-Cell Mobilization and Collection in Multiple Myeloma Patients
    Sauer, Sandra
    Hieke, Lennart
    Brandt, Julia
    Mueller-Tidow, Carsten
    Schmitt, Anita
    Kauer, Joseph
    Kriegsmann, Katharina
    TRANSFUSION MEDICINE AND HEMOTHERAPY, 2023, 50 (05) : 382 - 394
  • [29] Minimal residual disease negativity using deep sequencing is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma
    Perrot, Aurore
    Lauwers-Cances, Valerie
    Corre, Jill
    Robillard, Nelly
    Hulin, Cyrille
    Chretien, Marie-Lorraine
    Dejoie, Thomas
    Maheo, Sabrina
    Stoppa, Anne-Marie
    Pegourie, Brigitte
    Karlin, Lionel
    Garderet, Laurent
    Arnulf, Bertrand
    Doyen, Chantal
    Meuleman, Nathalie
    Royer, Bruno
    Eveillard, Jean-Richard
    Benboubker, Lotfi
    Dib, Mamoun
    Decaux, Olivier
    Jaccard, Arnaud
    Belhadj, Karim
    Brechignac, Sabine
    Kolb, Brigitte
    Fohrer, Cecile
    Mohty, Mohamad
    Macro, Margaret
    Richardson, Paul G.
    Carlton, Victoria
    Moorhead, Martin
    Willis, Tom
    Faham, Malek
    Anderson, Kenneth C.
    Harousseau, Jean-Luc
    Leleu, Xavier
    Facon, Thierry
    Moreau, Philippe
    Attal, Michel
    Avet-Loiseau, Herve
    Munshi, Nikhil
    BLOOD, 2018, 132 (23) : 2456 - 2464
  • [30] Pegylated Filgrastim Versus Filgrastim for Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma After Novel Agent Induction
    Abid, Muhammad Bilal
    De Mel, Sanjay
    Abid, Muhammad Abbas
    Yap, Eng Soo
    Gopalakrishnan, Sathish Kumar
    Chen, Yunxin
    Yuen, Yi Ching
    Wong, Hung Chew
    Lin, Adeline
    Poon, Li Mei
    Koh, Liang Piu
    Chng, Wee Joo
    Tan, Lip Kun
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2018, 18 (03): : 174 - 179