Defining the typical work environment for assisted reproductive technology laboratories in the United States

被引:4
|
作者
Boone, WR [1 ]
Higdon, HL [1 ]
机构
[1] Greenville Hosp Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, ART & Androl Labs, Greenville, SC 29605 USA
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; ART; laboratory personnel; staffing requirements; time requirements;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.038
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine time and staffing requirements as they relate to laboratory personnel in the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART). Design: Descriptive study. Setting: Assisted reproductive technology clinics in the United States. Personnel:. All personnel working in ART laboratories, which included laboratory directors and technicians (those laboratory personnel trained in specific areas of embryology, andrology, and endocrinology). Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measures(s): Frequencies were determined for time and staffing requirements as they pertained to individuals and procedures (e.g., oocyte retrieval, embryo transfer, semen analysis, hormone assay, etc.) performed in embryology, andrology, and endocrine laboratories. Result(s): Two different surveys of ART clinics in the United States were combined in this report. The average technician worked 40 hours a week, whereas the average laboratory director worked 49 hours per week. The average embryologist performed 181 procedures (not cases) per year. The average andrologist performed 648 procedures (not cases) per year, while the average endocrinologist completed 2,673 procedures (not cases) per year. Conclusion(s): This is the first report to describe time and staffing requirements as they relate to the laboratory personnel in an ART facility.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 626
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States by non-United States residents
    Levine, Aaron D.
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Berry, Roberta M.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Alberta-Sherer, Hillary B.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (05) : 815 - 821
  • [22] Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States†
    Reefhuis, J.
    Honein, M. A.
    Schieve, L. A.
    Correa, A.
    Hobbs, C. A.
    Rasmussen, S. A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2009, 24 (02) : 360 - 366
  • [23] Survey assessing obesity policies for assisted reproductive technology in the United States
    Kaye, Leah
    Sueldo, Carolina
    Engmann, Lawrence
    Nulsen, John
    Benadiva, Claudio
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (03) : 703 - +
  • [24] Safety of Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States, 2000-2011
    Kawwass, Jennifer F.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    Kulkarni, Aniket D.
    Creanga, Andreea A.
    Session, Donna R.
    Callaghan, William M.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (01): : 88 - 90
  • [25] Re: Assisted Reproductive Technology Use in the United States: A Population Assessment
    Niederberger, Craig
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (02): : 371 - 371
  • [26] Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States
    Fujimoto, Victor Y.
    Luke, Barbara
    Brown, Morton B.
    Jain, Tarun
    Armstrong, Alicia
    Grainger, David A.
    Hornstein, Mark D.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 93 (02) : 382 - 390
  • [27] Defining assisted reproductive technology success REPLY
    Meldrum, David R.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (04) : E31 - E32
  • [28] Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1996 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry
    Bustillo, M
    Yee, B
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (05) : 798 - 807
  • [30] Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1998 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry
    Zeitz, J
    McNamee, P
    Toner, JP
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (01) : 18 - 31