Fracture strength of root filled premolar teeth restored with silorane and methacrylate-based resin composite

被引:8
|
作者
Taha, N. A. [1 ]
Maghaireh, G. A. [1 ]
Bagheri, R. [2 ]
Abu Holy, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Conservat Dent Dept, Irbid 21110, Jordan
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Fac Dent, Biomat Res Ctr, Dept Dent Mat, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Root filled teeth; Silorane resin composites; Methacrylate resin composites; fracture strength; Fracture pattern; ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH; RESTORATIVE SYSTEMS; CUSP DEFLECTION; GLASS-IONOMER; RESISTANCE; STRESS; STRAIN; DENTIN; MICROLEAKAGE; CONTRACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.011
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare fracture characteristics of root-filled teeth with variable cavity design restored with a low shrinkage silorane and methacrylate-based resin composite. Methods: 77 extracted maxillary premolars were divided randomly into seven groups: (Group 1) intact teeth; (Groups 2-4) MOD plus endodontic access with the buccopalatal width of the occlusal isthmus equals one third of the intercuspal width; (Groups 5-7) MOD plus endodontic access with the buccopalatal width of the occlusal isthmus equals one half of the intercuspal width. Groups 2 and 5 were left unrestored, Groups 3 and 6 were restored with a silorane-based resin composite (Filtek P90) and Groups 4 and 7 with a methacrylatebased resin composite (Z250). Teeth were loaded in a universal testing machine; load and fracture patterns were recorded and compared statistically using 2-way ANOVA and t-test for pairwise comparisons and 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett test for multiple comparisons. Results: Unrestored teeth became progressively weaker with more extensive preparations, Group 5 (unfilled 1/2) showed the lowest fracture load among the groups (71 +/- 22 N, P < 0.001). Restorations increased the fracture strength of unrestored teeth regardless of cavity size (P < 0.001), but was still significantly weaker than sound teeth, with no significant difference between silorane and methacrylate groups. Failure of restored teeth was mostly adhesive at the tooth restoration interface. Conclusions: Silorane-based resin composite have no superior strengthening effect over the conventional methacrylate-based resin composite in restoration of root filled teeth. Both materials showed similar fracture patterns. Clinical significance: Root filled teeth are considerably weakened via restorative and endodontic procedures. A direct adhesive restoration will aid in preserving tooth structure as far as it provides enough strength. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 741
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hydrolytic degradation of silorane- and methacrylate-based composite restorations: Evaluation of push-out strength and marginal adaptation
    dos Santos, Priscila Jaques
    Silva, Marilia Santos
    Bruschi Alonso, Roberta Caroline
    Perlatti D'Alpino, Paulo Henrique
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 71 (05) : 1273 - 1279
  • [32] Characterization of Water Sorption, Solubility, and Roughness of Silorane- and Methacrylate-based Composite Resins
    Giannini, M.
    Di Francescantonio, M.
    Pacheco, R. R.
    Cidreira Boaro, L. C.
    Braga, R. R.
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 39 (03) : 264 - 272
  • [33] FRACTURE STRENGTH OF TEETH RESTORED WITH AMALGAM AND A BONDED-RESIN SUBSTRUCTURE
    STURDY, KA
    HARGRAVE, JW
    PELLEU, GB
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1986, 65 : 313 - 313
  • [34] Behavior of Polymerization Shrinkage Stress of Methacrylate-based Composite and Silorane-based Composite during Dental Restoration
    Park, Jung-Hoon
    Choi, Nak-Sam
    COMPOSITES RESEARCH, 2015, 28 (01): : 6 - 14
  • [35] Evaluation of cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored with low shrinkable resin composite (in vitro study)
    Labib, Labib Mohamed
    Nabih, Sameh Mahmoud
    Baroudi, Kusai
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PREVENTIVE AND COMMUNITY DENTISTRY, 2015, 5 (06): : 470 - 475
  • [36] Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles
    Rodrigues, F. B.
    Paranhos, M. P. G.
    Spohr, A. M.
    Oshima, H. M. S.
    Carlini, B.
    Burnett, L. H., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2010, 43 (05) : 356 - 362
  • [37] Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials
    Dalpino, PHP
    Francischone, CE
    Ishikiriama, A
    Franco, EB
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2002, 15 (06): : 389 - 394
  • [38] Effect of Load Cycling on the Fracture Strength/Mode of Teeth Restored with FRC Posts or a FRC Liner and a Resin Composite
    Gaintantzopoulou, Maria D.
    Farmakis, Eleftherios T.
    Eliades, George C.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [39] Fracture resistance of teeth adhesively restored with composite resin and ceramic restorations.
    Dalpino, PHP
    Francischone, CE
    Franco, EB
    Ishikiriama, A
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 966 - 966
  • [40] Bond Strength of Sandblasted PEEK with Dental Methyl Methacrylate-Based Cement or Composite-Based Resin Cement
    Hata, Kentaro
    Komagata, Yuya
    Nagamatsu, Yuki
    Masaki, Chihiro
    Hosokawa, Ryuji
    Ikeda, Hiroshi
    POLYMERS, 2023, 15 (08)