Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing in livestock species for individual traceability and parentage testing

被引:1
|
作者
Casellas, Joaquim [1 ]
de Hijas-Villalba, Melani Martin [1 ]
Vazquez-Gomez, Marta [1 ]
Id-Lahoucine, Samir [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Ciencia Anim & Aliments, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[2] Scotlands Rural Coll, Anim & Vet Sci Grp, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Evidential statistics; Paternity; Sequencing; Simulation; Traceability; GENETIC TRACEABILITY; MARKERS; SELECTION; IDENTIFICATION; POLYMORPHISM; ASSOCIATION; ASSIGNMENT; IMPUTATION; GENOTYPE; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104629
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Procedures for genetic traceability of animal products and parentage testing mainly focus on microsatellites or SNPs panels. Nevertheless, current availability of high-throughput sequencing technologies must be considered as an appealing alternative. This research focused on the evaluation of low-coverage whole-genome sequencing for traceability and paternity testing purposes, within a context of evidential statistics. Analyses were performed on a simulation basis and assumed individuals with 30 100-Mb/100-cM chromosome pairs and similar to 1,000,000 polymorphic SNPs per chromosome. Ten independent populations were simulated under recombination and mutation with effective populations size 100 (generations 1-1000), 10,000 (generation 1001) and 25,000 (generation 1002), and this last generation was retained for analytical purposes. Appropriate both traceability and paternity tests were developed and evaluated on different high-throughput sequencing scenarios accounting for genome coverage depth (0.01x, 0.05x, 0.1x and 0.5x), length of base-pair reads (100, 1000 and 10,000 bp), and sequencing error rate (0%, 1% and 10%). Assuming true sequencing error rates and genotypic frequencies, 0.05x genome coverage depth guaranteed 100% sensitivity and specificity for traceability and paternity tests (n = 1000). Same results were obtained when sequencing error rate was arbitrarily set to 0, or the maximum value assumed during simulation (i.e., 1%). In a similar way, uncertainly about genotypic frecuencies did not impair sensitivity under 0.05x genome coverage, although it reduced specificity for paternity tests up to 85.2%. These results highlighted low-coverage whole-genome sequencing as a promising tool for the livestock and food industry with both technological and (maybe) economic advantages.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effective low-coverage whole-genome sequencing assay for the risk stratification of gastric cancer
    Li-Ping Ye
    Xin-Li Mao
    Xian-Bin Zhou
    Yi Wang
    Shi-Wen Xu
    Sai-Qin He
    Zi-Liang Qian
    Xiao-Gang Zhang
    Li-Juan Zhai
    Jin-Bang Peng
    Bin-Bin Gu
    Xiu-Xiu Jin
    Ya-Qi Song
    Shao-Wei Li
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, 2022, (03) : 690 - 702
  • [22] Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing of extracellular vesicle-associated DNA in patients with metastatic cancer
    Nguyen, Bella
    Wong, Nicholas C.
    Semple, Tim
    Clark, Michael
    Wong, Stephen Q.
    Leslie, Connull
    Mirzai, Bob
    Millward, Michael
    Meehan, Katie
    Lim, Annette M.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [23] Using low-coverage whole genome sequencing (genome skimming) to delineate three introgressed species of buffalofish (Ictiobus)
    Literman, Robert
    Windsor, Amanda M.
    Bart Jr, Henry L.
    Hunter, Elizabeth Sage
    Deeds, Jonathan R.
    Handy, Sara M.
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 182
  • [24] A STRATEGY TO RECOVER A HIGH-QUALITY, COMPLETE PLASTID SEQUENCE FROM LOW-COVERAGE WHOLE-GENOME SEQUENCING
    Garaycochea, Silvia
    Speranza, Pablo
    Alvarez-Valin, Fernando
    APPLICATIONS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 2015, 3 (10):
  • [25] Induction and recovery of copy number variation in banana through gamma irradiation and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing
    Datta, Sneha
    Jankowicz-Cieslak, Joanna
    Nielen, Stephan
    Ingelbrecht, Ivan
    Till, Bradley J.
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 16 (09) : 1644 - 1653
  • [26] A comparison of existing global DNA methylation assays to low-coverage whole-genome bisulfite sequencing for epidemiological studies
    Crary-Dooley, Florence K.
    Tam, Mitchell E.
    Dunaway, Keith W.
    Hertz-Picciotto, Irva
    Schmidt, Rebecca J.
    LaSalle, Janine M.
    EPIGENETICS, 2017, 12 (03) : 206 - 214
  • [27] An accurate assignment test for extremely low-coverage whole-genome sequence data
    Ferrari, Giada
    Atmore, Lane M.
    Jentoft, Sissel
    Jakobsen, Kjetill S.
    Makowiecki, Daniel
    Barrett, James H.
    Star, Bastiaan
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2022, 22 (04) : 1330 - 1344
  • [28] Powerful Inference with the D-Statistic on Low-Coverage Whole-Genome Data
    Soraggi, Samuele
    Wiuf, Carsten
    Albrechtsen, Anders
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2018, 8 (02): : 551 - 566
  • [29] Ultra low-coverage whole genome sequencing for precision oncology in solid tumors
    Tarawneh, T. S.
    Rodepeter, F.
    Ross, P.
    Teply-Szymanski, J.
    Koch, V.
    Thoelken, C.
    Knorrenschild, J. Riera
    Wuendisch, T.
    Denkert, C.
    Neubauer, A.
    Mack, E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (08) : S1415 - S1416
  • [30] A beginner's guide to low-coverage whole genome sequencing for population genomics
    Lou, Runyang Nicolas
    Jacobs, Arne
    Wilder, Aryn P.
    Therkildsen, Nina Overgaard
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2021, 30 (23) : 5966 - 5993