The Surgical Care Improvement Project and Prevention of Post-Operative Infection, Including Surgical Site Infection

被引:190
|
作者
Rosenberger, Laura H. [1 ]
Politano, Amani D. [1 ]
Sawyer, Robert G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Surg, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
INTENSIVE INSULIN THERAPY; WOUND-INFECTION; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; PERIOPERATIVE OXYGEN; PERFORMANCE-MEASURES; COLORECTAL SURGERY; GLUCOSE CONTROL; MAJOR SURGERY; ASSOCIATION; REDUCE;
D O I
10.1089/sur.2010.083
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: In response to inconsistent compliance with infection prevention measures, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services collaborated with the U. S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on the Surgical Infection Prevention (SIP) project, introduced in 2002. Methods: Quality improvement measures were developed to standardize processes to increase compliance. In 2006, the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) developed out of the SIP project and its process measures. These initiatives, published in the Specifications Manual for National Inpatient Quality Measures, outline process and outcome measures. This continually evolving manual is intended to provide standard quality measures to unify documentation and track standards of care. Results: Seven of the SCIP initiatives apply to the peri-operative period: Prophylactic antibiotics should be received within 1 h prior to surgical incision (1), be selected for activity against the most probable antimicrobial contaminants (2), and be discontinued within 24 h after the surgery end-time (3); (4) euglycemia should be maintained, with well-controlled morning blood glucose concentrations on the first two post-operative days, especially in cardiac surgery patients; (6) hair at the surgical site should be removed with clippers or by depilatory methods, not with a blade; (9) urinary catheters are to be removed within the first two post-operative days; and (10) normothermia should be maintained peri-operatively. Conclusions: There is strong evidence that implementation of protocols that standardize practices reduce the risk of surgical infection. The SCIP initiative targets complications that account for a significant portion of preventable morbidity as well as cost. One of the goals of the SCIP guidelines was a 25% reduction in the incidence of surgical site infections from implementation through 2010. Process measures are becoming routine, and as we practice more evidence-based medicine, it falls to us, the surgeons and scientists, to be active, not only in the implementation and execution of these measures, but in the investigation of clinical questions and the writing of protocols. We are responsible for ensuring that out-of-date practices are removed from use and that new practices are appropriate, achievable, and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 168
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Identifying opportunities for quality improvement in surgical site infection prevention
    Gagliardi, Anna R.
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    McKenzie, Margaret
    Fenech, Darlene
    Nathens, Avery
    McLeod, Robin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2009, 37 (05) : 398 - 402
  • [22] Sternal surgical site infection prevention - is there any room for improvement?
    Beckmann, Andreas
    Doebler, Klaus
    Schaefer, Elke
    Koetting, Joachim
    Gastmeier, Petra
    Graf, Karolin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 40 (02) : 347 - 351
  • [23] An Increase in Compliance With the Surgical Care Improvement Project Measures Does Not Prevent Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery
    Pastor, Carlos
    Artinyan, Avo
    Varma, Madhulika G.
    Kim, Edward
    Gibbs, Laurel
    Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [24] Current Treatment Guidelines for Postoperative Surgical Site Infection: Clinical Considerations in the Surgical Care Improvement Project Era
    Richmond, Bryan K.
    O'Brien, Bridget
    Ubert, Adam
    Thompson, Stephanie
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2015, 81 (04) : E179 - E180
  • [25] Implementation of Surgical Quality Improvement: Auditing Tool for Surgical Site Infection Prevention Practices
    Hechenbleikner, Elizabeth M.
    Hobson, Deborah B.
    Bennett, Jennifer L.
    Wick, Elizabeth C.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (01) : 83 - 90
  • [26] OUR EFFORT TO REDUCE POST-OPERATIVE SURGICAL SITE INFECTION AFTER RESECTION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF ORAL CANCER
    Takanari, K.
    Nakakawaji, M.
    Mogi, K.
    Nabetani, S.
    Uchikoshi, H.
    Maruyama, Y.
    Okumura, S.
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2024, 32 (04) : 610 - 610
  • [27] Case series of Rapidly growing Mycobacterial Post-operative surgical site infection in kidney transplant recipients
    Al Masalmani, Muna
    Hashim, Samar Mahmoud A.
    Ittaman, Ajithkumar
    Jarir, Sulieman S. Abu
    Abukhattab, Mohammed
    Al Soub, Hussam
    Al Suwaidi, Zubaida
    Fadhil, Riyadh
    Ali, Omar
    IDCASES, 2022, 30
  • [28] Pre-Operative and Early Post-Operative Factors Associated with Surgical Site Infection after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Ruiz-Tovar, Jaime
    Oller, Inmaculada
    Llavero, Carolina
    Arroyo, Antonio
    Luis Munoz, Jose
    Calero, Alicia
    Diez, Maria
    Zubiaga, Lorea
    Calpena, Rafael
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2013, 14 (04) : 369 - 373
  • [29] Progress in the prevention of surgical site infection
    Casey, Anna L.
    Elliott, Tom S. J.
    CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 22 (04) : 370 - 375
  • [30] Surgical Site Infection Prevention A Review
    Seidelman, Jessica L.
    Mantyh, Christopher R.
    Anderson, Deverick J.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 329 (03): : 244 - 252