Managing diverse stakeholders in enterprise systems projects: a control portfolio approach

被引:39
|
作者
Soh, Christina [1 ]
Chua, Cecil Eng Huang [1 ]
Singh, Harminder [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Business Sch, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[2] Michigan State Univ, Eli Broad Grad Sch Business, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
control; multiple stakeholders; project management; enterprise systems; PEER PRESSURE; SOFTWARE; COORDINATION; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1057/jit.2010.13
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
While substantial research has examined the control of information systems (IS) projects, most studies in this area have only examined how one controller manages a single group of controllees. However, many IS projects, especially enterprise systems projects (often initiated by an organization's corporate headquarters, and involving business unit users and consultants), have multiple stakeholders. The corporate headquarters (the project's principal controller) must simultaneously ensure that the various stakeholders are aligned with the project's goals despite their diverse motivations, and that the stakeholders collaborate with each other to achieve project success. Behavior control theory argues that the controller enacts a control portfolio of formal and informal controls. However, the presence of multiple controllee groups increases the complexity of vertical controller-controllee relationships, the salience of controllee-controllee relationships, and the interaction between these vertical and horizontal relationships. We therefore examined the creation and evolution of the control portfolio in a multi-stakeholder project over a period of 14 months. We found that (1) the principal controller did enact separate controls for the user and consultant groups; (2) there was more than one controller - the principal controller co-existed with subordinate controllers; and (3) controls enacted by the subordinate controllers and other controllees that cut across stakeholder groups required the support of the principal controller. Journal of Information Technology (2011) 26, 16-31. doi:10.1057/jit.2010.13; Published online 24 August 2010
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 31
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An enterprise portfolio approach for defence capability planning
    Filinkov, Alexei
    Dortmans, Peter J.
    DEFENCE AND SECURITY ANALYSIS, 2014, 30 (01): : 76 - 82
  • [32] Review of Effective Practices for Managing Utility Coordination Stakeholders in Highway Projects
    Victorio, Shani A. Montes
    Sturgill, Roy E., Jr.
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2024: CONTRACTING, DELIVERY, SCHEDULING, ESTIMATING, ECONOMICS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, : 580 - 590
  • [33] Investment projects' ranging as an instrument of real investments portfolio formation for an enterprise
    Hotomlyanskiy, A. L.
    Znakhurenko, P. A.
    ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS, 2008, (81): : 113 - 121
  • [34] Understanding requirements in enterprise systems projects
    Gulla, JA
    12TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 176 - 185
  • [35] Using models in enterprise systems projects
    Gulla, Jon Atle
    CONCEPTUAL MODELLING IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2007, : 107 - 122
  • [36] Managing complexity of enterprise information systems
    Maciaszek, Leszek A.
    Enterprise Information Systems VI, 2006, : 30 - 36
  • [37] Managing enterprise resource planning systems
    Dery, Kristine
    Grant, David
    Hall, Richard
    Wailes, Nick
    STRATEGIC CHANGE-BRIEFINGS IN ENTREPRENEURIAL FINANCE, 2005, 14 (05): : 239 - 243
  • [38] Managing risks in enterprise systems implementations
    Scott, JE
    Vessey, I
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2002, 45 (04) : 74 - 81
  • [39] Managing Virtuality in Enterprise Social Systems
    Lee, James J.
    Imanaka, Jessica Ludescher
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 12 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [40] Managing process deficiencies with enterprise systems
    Shang, Shari
    Seddon, Peter B.
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 13 (03) : 405 - 416