Alcohol and Drug Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Training and Implementation: Perspectives from 4 Health Professions

被引:40
|
作者
Wamsley, Maria [1 ]
Satterfield, Jason M. [1 ]
Curtis, Alexa [2 ]
Lundgren, Lena [3 ]
Satre, Derek D. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Gen Internal Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ San Francisco, Dept Integrated Healthcare, Sch Nursing & Hlth Profess, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
[3] Denver Univ, Grad Sch Social Work, Butler Inst Families, Denver, CO USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, UCSF Weill Inst Neurosci, Dept Psychiat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
关键词
alcohol; brief intervention; drugs; implementation; screening; training; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT PATIENTS; PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS; SUBSTANCE USE; SOCIAL-WORK; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; USE DISORDERS; HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS; ADDICTION TREATMENT; REDUCE ALCOHOL;
D O I
10.1097/ADM.0000000000000410
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) can effectively identify and address substance misuse and substance use disorders (SUDs), and can be delivered by a range of trained health professionals. Yet, barriers remain to effective training and implementation of SBIRT in health and social service settings, and models of interprofessional collaboration in SBIRT delivery are underdeveloped. Methods: We reviewed current literature regarding SBIRT effectiveness, training, and implementation by physicians, nurses, psychologists, and social workers. An SBIRT expert and representative from each health profession synthesized literature and training experiences to inform the development of interprofessional training and collaborative implementation strategies. Results: Each of the health professions involved in SBIRT training and implementation have strengths and weaknesses that influence how SBIRT is taught, learned, and delivered. Some of these are specific to the components of SBIRT, for example, screening versus brief intervention, whereas others depend on profession-driven competencies, for example, motivational interviewing. Professional organizations have encouraged a range of tailored SBIRT training initiatives, but true interprofessional training and the implementation of collaborative, team-based care are largely unrealized. Conclusions: SBIRT can be a valuable approach to screening and treatment for SUDs when delivered by a range of healthcare professionals. A more nuanced understanding of the assumptions and characteristics of each profession, informed by the emerging field of implementation science, may shape more effective training curricula and highlight interprofessional models of SBIRT delivery that maximize the strengths of each profession.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 272
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A time-in-motion study of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) implementation in healthcare settings
    Alexander J Cowell
    William N Dowd
    Justin Landwehr
    Jeremy W Bray
    Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 8 (Suppl 1)
  • [42] SCREENING, BRIEF INTERVENTION, AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT (SBIRT) IN RURAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS: BARRIERS AND FACILITATORS TO ITS IMPLEMENTATION
    Sharma, Pravesh
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 61 (10): : S58 - S58
  • [43] A Time-in-Motion Study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Implementation in Healthcare Settings
    Dowd, William
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2014, 35 (02) : 201 - 201
  • [44] Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) implementation models and work flow processes: commonalities and variations
    Janice Vendetti
    Bonnie McRee
    Amy Hernandez
    Georgia Karuntzos
    Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 8 (Suppl 1)
  • [45] Final Results of an Interprofessional Emergency Department Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Implementation Project
    Mitchell, Ann
    Puskar, Kathy
    Hagle, Holly
    Lindsay, Dawn
    AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, 2015, 24 (01): : 77 - 78
  • [46] Strategies to promote the implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in healthcare settings: a scoping review
    Thoele, Kelli
    Moffat, Laura
    Konicek, Stephanie
    Lam-Chi, Monika
    Newkirk, Erica
    Fulton, Janet
    Newhouse, Robin
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PREVENTION AND POLICY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [47] Institutional Incorporation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in Residency Training: Achieving a Sustainable Curriculum
    Scott, Denise M.
    McLaurin-Jones, TyWanda
    Brown, Fannie D.
    Newton, Robin
    Marshall, Vanessa J.
    Kalu, Nnenna
    Cain, Gloria E.
    Taylor, Robert E.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2012, 33 (03) : 308 - 311
  • [48] New Hampshire Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment ("SBIRT") InterProfessional Education ("IPE") Training Collaborative
    DiNapoli, Pamela
    Pervanas, Helen
    Towle, Jennifer
    Barta, Kate Semple
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2019, 68 (02) : E54 - E55
  • [49] Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral, and Treatment (SBIRT): The Physician Alcoholism and Other Addictions Training Program (PAAT)
    Pace, Nicholas
    Schwartz, Charles E.
    Ciccaroni, William
    Levounis, Petros
    Parish, Sharon
    Schwartzberg, Max Y.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2012, 33 (02) : 223 - 223
  • [50] Impact of a multicomponent screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) training curriculum on a medical residency program
    Kalu, Nnenna
    Cain, Gloria
    McLaurin-Jones, TyWanda
    Scott, Denise
    Kwagyan, John
    Fassassi, Catsim
    Greene, Wendy
    Taylor, Robert E.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2016, 37 (01) : 242 - 247