Performance of Soil Solarization and Methyl Bromide in Sites Infested with Root-knot Nematodes

被引:0
|
作者
McSorley, Robert [1 ]
Gill, Harsimran K. [1 ]
Hanspetersen, Heidi N. [1 ]
Rosskopf, Erin N. [2 ]
Kokalis-Burelle, Nancy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Entomol & Nematol, IFAS, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Hort Res Lab, Ft Pierce, FL 34945 USA
关键词
Antirrhinum majus; floriculture; Meloidogyne incognita; methyl bromide alternatives; nonchemical pest management; snapdragon; PHYTOPHTHORA BLIGHT; MANAGEMENT; WEEDS; ALTERNATIVES; REDUCTION; DISEASE; FLORIDA; ROT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Fumigation with methyl bromide has been a principal means of managing soilborne pest problems for many years. Interest in effective alternatives increased during the phase-out of methyl bromide, and will become more acute as existing stocks are depleted. Since it can reduce plant-parasitic nematode infestations, soil solarization could be a useful component in a nonchemical alternative program, but questions remain about its efficacy relative to methyl bromide. The performance of solarization and fumigation with methyl bromide:chloropicrin (50:50) were compared in snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.) cut flower crops in sites with a history of problems from root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). In most instances, snapdragon plants exhibited lower levels of galling caused by root-knot nematodes following preplant fumigation than following solarization. Fumigation also resulted in increased plant height, but crop yield was unaffected, due to variability among plots. Following the solarization treatment with drenches of Biophos (R) did not improve results over solarization alone. Solarization was not as consistent as soil fumigation in reducing galling from root-knot nematodes. Although it can be useful in an integrated program as a non-chemical alternative to methyl bromide, solarization should be used with caution in sites with heavy pressure from root-knot nematodes.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 307
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A CORRELATIVE MODEL PREDICTING YIELD OF SOYBEAN IN FIELD INFESTED WITH ROOT-KNOT AND CYST NEMATODES
    SCHWARTZ, M
    RODRIGUEZKABANA, R
    MACK, T
    BACKMAN, PA
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1986, 76 (03) : 376 - 376
  • [32] Chemical control of root-knot nematodes
    Lamberti, F
    D'Addabbo, T
    Sasanelli, N
    Carella, A
    Greco, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CHEMICAL AND NON-CHEMICAL SOIL AND SUBSTRATE DISINFESTATION, 2000, (532): : 183 - 187
  • [33] RESISTANCE IN SOYBEANS TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES
    HOLSTON, EM
    CRITTENDEN, HW
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1951, 41 (06) : 562 - 562
  • [34] ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES AND LEGUME NODULES
    ROBINSON, PE
    NATURE, 1961, 189 (476) : 506 - &
  • [35] PERINEAL PATTERNS OF ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES
    TAYLOR, AL
    DROPKIN, VH
    MARTIN, GC
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1955, 45 (01) : 26 - 34
  • [36] STUDIES ON ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES IN WHEAT
    PATEL, YC
    PATEL, DJ
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF NEMATOLOGY, 1991, 9 (02): : 119 - 126
  • [37] FIELD PERFORMANCE OF TOMATO VARIETIES RESISTANT TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES
    STIRLING, GR
    WACHTEL, MF
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1982, 22 (117): : 357 - 360
  • [38] RESISTANCE TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES IN COWPEA
    HARE, WW
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1959, 49 (05) : 318 - 318
  • [39] RESISTANCE OF BERMUDAGRASS TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES
    BERTRAND, DE
    JOHNSON, AW
    BURTON, GW
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1985, 75 (11) : 1305 - 1305
  • [40] Flooding to control root-knot nematodes
    Brown, LN
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1933, 47 : 0883 - 0888