Gluteal injection site granulomas: false positive finding on FDG-PET in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

被引:30
|
作者
Prosch, H
Mirzaei, S
Oschatz, E
Strasser, G
Huber, M
Mostbeck, G
机构
[1] Otto Wagner Hosp, Dept Radiol, A-1140 Vienna, Austria
[2] Wilhelminenspital Stadt Wien, Inst Nucl Med, A-1160 Vienna, Austria
[3] Otto Wagner Hosp, Dept Pathol, A-1140 Vienna, Austria
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2005年 / 78卷 / 932期
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr/55106848
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Positron-emission-tomography (PET) with fludeoxyglucose F-18 ([F-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, FDG) has become an established imaging modality in patients with lung cancer for mediastinal lymph node staging and the detection of extrathoracic metastases. However, tracer accumulations are not limited to malignant tissue but are also found in muscles and benign inflammatory processes. We report on two patients with lung cancer in whom FDG-PET revealed suspicious tracer accumulations in the buttock. Ultrasound (US) revealed a hyperechogenic nodule with poorly defined margins in both patients. On specific inquiry both patients reported on repeated "intramuscular" gluteal injections. Histology after US guided biopsy showed an accumulation of macrophages within fibrous tissue, compatible with injection site granulomas. The reported cases underline that F-18-FDG may accumulate in benign, ancillary processes that have to be distinguished from distant metastases. Tracer accumulation in the buttocks may be highly suggestive of injection site granulomas, especially if the patient reports on "intramuscular" injections. In this setting, US is a widely available modality to distinguish metastasis from adipose tissue necrosis.
引用
收藏
页码:758 / 761
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in staging non-small cell lung cancer: the PLUS study
    Paul Verboom
    Harm van Tinteren
    Otto S. Hoekstra
    Egbert F. Smit
    Jan H. A. M. van den Bergh
    Ad J. M. Schreurs
    Roland A. L. M. Stallaert
    Piet C. M. van Velthoven
    Emile F. I. Comans
    Fred W. Diepenhorst
    Johan C. van Mourik
    Pieter E. Postmus
    Maarten Boers
    Els W. M. Grijseels
    Gerrit J. J. Teule
    Carin A. Uyl-de Groot
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2003, 30 : 1444 - 1449
  • [42] Pretreatment FDG-PET SUVmax is not a prognostic marker in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer
    Clausen, Malene
    Brittain, Jane
    Loft, Annika
    Langer, Seppo
    Kjaer, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57
  • [43] FDG-PET imaging and the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer in a region of high histoplasmosis prevalence
    Croft, DR
    Trapp, J
    Kernstine, K
    Kirchner, P
    Mullan, B
    Galvin, J
    Peterson, MW
    Gross, T
    McLennan, G
    Kern, JA
    LUNG CANCER, 2002, 36 (03) : 297 - 301
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in staging non-small cell lung cancer: the PLUS study
    Verboom, P
    van Tinteren, H
    Hoekstra, OS
    Smit, EF
    van den Bergh, JHAM
    Schreurs, AJM
    Stallaert, RALM
    van Velthoven, PCM
    Comans, EFI
    Diepenhorst, FW
    van Mourik, JC
    Postmus, PE
    Boers, M
    Grijseels, EWM
    Teule, GJJ
    Uyl-de Groot, CA
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (11) : 1444 - 1449
  • [45] How effective is FDG-PET in the locoregional lymph node staging of non-small cell lung cancer?
    Türkmen, C
    Yilmazbayhan, D
    Erelel, M
    Halaç, M
    Ece, T
    Durgun, E
    Güllüoglu, M
    Selçuk, NA
    Kalayci, G
    Sönmezoglu, K
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 : S350 - S350
  • [46] FDG-PET and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer
    Hoopes, D
    Tann, M
    McGarry, R
    Lo, S
    Timmerman, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02): : S225 - S225
  • [47] Non-small cell lung cancer in the new millennium: The effect of FDG-PET on stage distribution.
    Goodgame, B.
    Morgensztern, D.
    Grove, L.
    Govindan, R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 415S - 415S
  • [48] A problem of FDG-PET in patients with lung cancer diagnosed as N3: False positive
    Hara, M
    Shiraki, N
    Iida, A
    Tamaki, T
    Itoh, M
    Arakawa, T
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 409 - 409
  • [49] FDG-PET imaging in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer
    Salminen, E
    Mac Manus, M
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (03) : 357 - 360
  • [50] False positive findings for lung cancer on thoracic FDG-PET: CT correlation
    Kim, N
    Young, W
    Balcombe, JN
    Yung, EY
    Motroni, B
    Katz, DS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) : 106 - 106