Electrical stimulation to treat tinnitus: a meta-analysis and systemic review of randomized controlled trials

被引:5
|
作者
Yang, Ting [2 ]
Zhang, Jin [1 ]
Wang, Bing [1 ]
Zhang, Wen [1 ]
Xu, Min [1 ]
Yang, Shuangyuan [2 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Shaanxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Xian 710068, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Med Univ, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
electrical stimulation; meta-analysis; tinnitus; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; REPEATED SESSIONS;
D O I
10.1177/20406223211041069
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Tinnitus is one of the most common otological symptoms that patients experience, and it can be debilitating. No effective drug treatments are available for tinnitus, although considerable research investigating its mechanisms and possible treatments is underway. Electrical stimulation has been considered a promising and well-tolerated therapeutic strategy for tinnitus. This meta-analysis study was aimed to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of electrical stimulation in patients with tinnitus. Methods: Relevant studies were retrieved from the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM), Wanfang and Weipu databases. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) which focus on loudness and distress evaluation (0-10 points) were used to assess perceived tinnitus suppression after treatment. Subgroup analysis was also performed based on different stimulating areas and methods, follow-up times, tinnitus duration and electrical current intensity. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for data synthesis, and Stata 15.1 software was used for analyses of publication bias and sensitivity. Results: Our meta-analysis included 11 studies involving a total of 447 patients with tinnitus. The results showed that electrical stimulation significantly reduced THI scores [mean difference (MD) = -9.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -14.25, -5.13; p < 0.0001; I-2 = 80%] and VAS scores between the two groups (VAS loudness scores, MD = -0.72; 95% CI = -1.20, -0.25; VAS distress scores, MD = -0.90; 95% CI = -1.17, -0.63). In addition, subgroup analysis showed that THI scores in electrical stimulation group of different stimulating areas and methods follow-up times, tinnitus duration and electrical current intensity were generally reduced, regardless of the acute or subacute tinnitus group or left temporoparietal area (LTA) group with no statistical significance between two groups. Conclusion: Overall, electrical stimulation may be an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for tinnitus.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of educational counseling alone on people with tinnitus: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xiang, Tao
    Zhong, Juan
    Lu, Tao
    Pu, Jun-mei
    Liu, Lu
    Xiao, Yan
    Lai, Dan
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (01) : 44 - 54
  • [32] Intravenous dexamethasone and peripheral nerve blocks: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Teshome, Diriba
    Fenta, Efrem
    Hunie, Metages
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN, 2020, 26 : 86 - 96
  • [33] Auricular stimulation for preoperative anxiety - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Usichenko, Taras I.
    Hua, Kevin
    Cummings, Mike
    Nowak, Andreas
    Hahnenkamp, Klaus
    Brinkhaus, Benno
    Dietzel, Joanna
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2022, 76
  • [34] Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation for migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Song, Dong
    Li, Piaoyi
    Wang, Yonggang
    Cao, Jin
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [35] Transcranial direct current stimulation for migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hong, Peiwei
    Liu, Yao
    Wan, Yang
    Xiong, Hai
    Xu, Yanming
    CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 28 (07) : 992 - 998
  • [36] Cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
    Hua, Kevin
    Cummings, Mike
    Bernatik, Miriam
    Brinkhaus, Benno
    Usichenko, Taras
    Dietzel, Joanna
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [37] Electrical Stimulation for Long-Bone Fracture-Healing: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Mollon, Brent
    da Silva, Vitor
    Busse, Jason W.
    Einhorn, Thomas A.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (11): : 2322 - 2330
  • [38] Non-invasive electrical stimulation in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia and spasticity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Mai, Aaron Shengting
    Yong, Jung Hahn
    Lim, Oliver Zi Hern
    Tan, Eng-King
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 29 (09) : 2842 - 2850
  • [39] Efficacy and Safety of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for Postoperative Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wang, Dan
    Shi, Hongshuo
    Yang, Zhenguo
    Liu, Wenbin
    Qi, Lu
    Dong, Chengda
    Si, Guomin
    Guo, Qi
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 2022
  • [40] RETRACTED: Electrical Stimulation for Hemiplegic Shoulder Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 15 Randomized Controlled Trials (Retracted Article)
    Gu, Ping
    Ran, Juan-juan
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 97 (09): : 1588 - 1594