Symbolic Processing Mediates the Relation Between Non-symbolic Processing and Later Arithmetic Performance

被引:4
|
作者
Finke, Sabrina [1 ]
Freudenthaler, H. Harald [1 ]
Landerl, Karin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Inst Psychol, Graz, Austria
[2] Macquarie Univ, Dept Cognit Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
numerical cognition; non-symbolic; symbolic; longitudinal; mediation; APPROXIMATE NUMBER SYSTEM; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MATHEMATICAL SKILLS; CHILDREN; ACUITY; SENSE; REPRESENTATIONS; ACHIEVEMENT; WORKING; MEMORY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00549
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The nature of the relation between non-symbolic and symbolic magnitude processing in the prediction of arithmetic remains a hotly debated subject. This longitudinal study examined whether the influence of non-symbolic magnitude processing on arithmetic is mediated by symbolic processing skills. A sample of 130 children with age-adequate (N = 73) or below-average (N = 57) achievement in early arithmetic was followed from the end of Grade 1 (mean age: 86.9 months) through the beginning of Grade 4. Symbolic comparison of one- and two-digit numbers serially mediated the effect of non-symbolic comparison on later arithmetic. These results support a developmental model in which non-symbolic processing provides a scaffold for single-digit processing, which in turn influences multi-digit processing and arithmetic. In conclusion, both non-symbolic and symbolic processing play an important role in the development of arithmetic during primary school and might be valuable long-term indicators for the early identification of children at risk for low achievement in arithmetic.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neural representational similarity between symbolic and non-symbolic quantities predicts arithmetic skills in childhood but not adolescence
    Schwartz, Flora
    Zhang, Yuan
    Chang, Hyesang
    Karraker, Shelby
    Kang, Julia Boram
    Menon, Vinod
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 24 (06)
  • [32] SYMBOLIC VERSUS NON-SYMBOLIC POLITICAL INFORMATION-PROCESSING - INVESTIGATION USING REACTION-TIMES
    SMITH, ER
    MILLER, FD
    PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1979, 5 (03) : 274 - 275
  • [33] The production of symbolic and non-symbolic numerals
    Herrera, A.
    Macizo, P.
    WCPCG 2010, 2010, 5 : 926 - 934
  • [34] Factors influencing the role of inhibitory control in non-symbolic numerical processing
    Guo, Junzhen
    Wei, Wei
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2024, 248
  • [35] Arithmetic skills correlate negatively with the overlap of symbolic and non-symbolic number representations in the brain
    Bulthe, Jessica
    De Smedt, Bert
    Op de Beeck, Hans P.
    CORTEX, 2018, 101 : 306 - 308
  • [36] Protocol Protocol to examine the neural basis of symbolic and non-symbolic quantity processing in human brain with fMRI
    Altinok, Simge
    Vatansever, Gozde
    Ustun, Sertac
    Kale, Emre H.
    Cicek, Metehan
    STAR PROTOCOLS, 2022, 3 (04):
  • [37] Non-Symbolic Number Processing in Developmental Dyscalculia: Impairment of Production But Not Comprehension
    Lafay, Anne
    St-Pierre, Marie-Catherine
    Macoir, Joel
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2015, 69 (04): : 371 - 371
  • [38] Different impacts of long-term abacus training on symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing in children
    Yao, Yuan
    Zhou, Hui
    Xu, Tianyong
    Ge, Xuelian
    Du, Fenglei
    Wang, Chunjie
    Chen, Feiyan
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 178
  • [39] Developmental trajectories of symbolic magnitude and order processing and their relation with arithmetic development
    Finke, Sabrina
    Vogel, Stephan E.
    Freudenthaler, H. Harald
    Banfi, Chiara
    Steiner, Anna F.
    Kemeny, Ferenc
    Goebel, Silke M.
    Landerl, Karin
    COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 64
  • [40] Non-symbolic and symbolic number lines are dissociated
    He, Xingcheng
    Guo, Pengpeng
    Li, Shuyi
    Shen, Xiaojing
    Zhou, Xinlin
    COGNITIVE PROCESSING, 2021, 22 (03) : 475 - 486