Spinal Cord Stimulation for Central Poststroke Pain

被引:27
|
作者
Aly, Mohamed M. [2 ]
Saitoh, Youichi [1 ]
Hosomi, Koichi [1 ]
Oshino, Satoru [2 ]
Kishima, Haruhiko [2 ]
Yoshimine, Toshiki [2 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Dept Neuromodulat & Neurosurg, Ctr Adv Sci & Innovat, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
关键词
Central poststroke pain; Medically refractory; Neurostimulation; Spinal cord stimulation; MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION; CHRONIC NEUROPATHIC PAIN; CHRONIC BENIGN PAIN; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1227/01.NEU.0000382965.95819.73
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Although spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be effective for treating neuropathic pain of peripheral origin, its effectiveness for central poststroke pain (CPSP) is not well established. OBJECTIVE: We report our experience with SCS in 30 consecutive patients with intractable CPSP. METHODS: All patients underwent a percutaneous SCS trial. When patients decided to proceed, they received a permanent SCS system. Pain intensity was evaluated by a visual analogue scale (VAS). The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale was also assessed at the latest follow-up visit as an indicator of overall improvement. RESULTS: During trial stimulation, pain relief was good (>= 50% VAS score reduction) in 9 patients (30%), fair (30%-49% reduction) in 6 patients (20%), and poor (<30% reduction) in 15 patients (50%). Ten patients elected to receive a permanent SCS system. Nine of these 10 patients were followed long-term (mean, 28 months; range, 6-62 months). Seven patients reported significant pain relief on the VAS (5 = good and 2 = fair). On the PGIC scale, 6 of these 7 patients reported a rating of 2 (much improved) and 1 reported a rating of 3 (minimally improved). Of the remaining 2 patients, 1 reported a rating of 4 (no change) and 1 reported a rating of 5 (minimally worse). The median VAS score in the 9 patients decreased significantly from 8.6 (range, 6.0-10.0) to 4.5 (range, 3.0-8.0; P = .008). There were no significant reported complications. CONCLUSION: SCS may provide improved pain control in a group of patients with intractable CPSP and may have therapeutic potential for intractable CPSP.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 212
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spinal cord stimulation for visceral pain: A review
    Kapural, Leonardo
    Dua, Susheel
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 2007, 109 (03) : 227 - 230
  • [32] SPINAL-CORD STIMULATION IN DEAFFERENTATION PAIN
    SANCHEZLEDESMA, MJ
    GARCIAMARCH, G
    DIAZCASCAJO, P
    GOMEZMORETA, J
    BROSETA, J
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 53 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [33] The efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain
    Kavar, B
    Rosenfeld, JV
    Hutchinson, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 7 (05) : 409 - 413
  • [34] Blockage of pain by electrical spinal cord stimulation
    Rattay, Frank
    Tafvizi, Pegah
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2023, 114 (05) : 620 - 627
  • [35] Personalising pain control with spinal cord stimulation
    Aarabi, Bizhan
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2020, 19 (02): : 103 - 104
  • [36] Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of chronic pain
    Andrew G. Shetter
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 1997, 1 (3) : 213 - 222
  • [37] Spinal Cord Stimulation in Pain Management: A Review
    Jeon, Young Hoon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 25 (03): : 143 - 150
  • [38] Spinal cord stimulation: Beyond pain management
    Tapia Perez, J. H.
    NEUROLOGIA, 2022, 37 (07): : 586 - 595
  • [39] Spinal cord stimulation for peripheral ischemic pain
    Mekhail, NA
    MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC PAIN: THE USE OF THE TOOLS OF THE TRADE, 2000, : 661 - 664
  • [40] Effects of spinal cord stimulation on ischaemic pain
    Claeys, LGY
    Horsch, S
    PAIN CLINIC, 1996, 9 (02): : 161 - 168