Comparing video modeling and computer-based instruction to teach preference assessment implementation

被引:10
|
作者
Vladescu, Jason C. [1 ]
Mery, Jacqueline N. [1 ]
Marano-Frezza, Kathleen E. [1 ]
Breeman, Samantha L. [1 ]
Campanaro, Alexandra M. [1 ]
Naude, Gideon P. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Caldwell Univ, Dept Appl Behav Anal, 120 Bloomfield Ave, Caldwell, ID 07006 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Appl Behav Sci, Lawrence, MA USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
Computer-based instruction; preference assessments; staff training; video model; VOICEOVER INSTRUCTION; TREATMENT INTEGRITY; TRAINING STAFF; PLUS FEEDBACK; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1080/01608061.2021.1965940
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research is needed to identify staff training techniques that optimize training time and do not require the presence of a staff trainer. Asynchronous training procedures, such as video modeling and computer-based instruction, do not require the simultaneous presence of a trainer and trainee, but include different training characteristics that must be evaluated (i.e., active responding during computer-based instruction and non-active responding during video modeling). The purpose of the present study was to compare video modeling and computer-based instruction on trainee implementation of a paired-stimulus preference assessment. Results demonstrated that both training techniques were effective for training staff to implement stimulus preference assessments. Results are discussed and suggestions for future research are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 74
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A COMPUTER-BASED TUTORIAL TO TEACH THE PHONETIC ALPHABET
    JAMIESON, DG
    MILLER, DI
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 1986, 10 (04) : 411 - 416
  • [42] Using video modeling with voiceover instruction plus feedback to train implementation of stimulus preference assessments
    Nottingham, Casey L.
    Vladescu, Jason C.
    Giannakakos, Antonia R.
    Schnell, Lauren K.
    Lipschultz, Joshua L.
    LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2017, 58 : 37 - 47
  • [43] LEARNING SPREADSHEETS - HUMAN INSTRUCTION VS COMPUTER-BASED INSTRUCTION
    HICKS, JO
    HICKS, SA
    SEN, TK
    BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 10 (06) : 491 - 500
  • [44] Teaching Discrete Trial Training: The Effects of Asynchronous Computer-Based Instruction on Live Implementation
    Serna, Richard W.
    Foran, Michelle M.
    Cooke, Caroline
    Hurd, Kaitlyn E.
    Tello, Ashley J.
    Vangapalli, Rishi
    Hamad, Charles D.
    JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 31 (01) : 39 - 49
  • [45] The effects of a computer-based video intervention to teach literacy skills to a student with a moderate intellectual disability
    Rivera, Christopher J.
    Jabeen, Iffat
    Mason, Lee L.
    INTERACTION DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURES, 2016, (28) : 85 - 102
  • [46] Integrating computer-based instruction and peer tutoring
    Smith, RG
    INTERVENTION IN SCHOOL AND CLINIC, 1997, 33 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [47] STRATEGIES FOR DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF COMPUTER-BASED INSTRUCTION
    SCHMIDT, SM
    SCCS PROCEEDINGS : 22ND ANNUAL SMALL COLLEGE COMPUTING SYMPOSIUM, 1989, : 359 - 368
  • [48] EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPUTER-BASED INSTRUCTION - AN UPDATED ANALYSIS
    KULIK, CLC
    KULIK, JA
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1991, 7 (1-2) : 75 - 94
  • [49] A Computer-based Module for Prescribing Error Instruction
    Peeters, Michael J.
    Kamm, Gayle L.
    Beltyukova, Svetlana A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 73 (06)
  • [50] A COMPARISON OF COMPUTER-BASED TRAINING AND CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION
    MAUL, GP
    SPOTTS, DS
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 25 (02): : 25 - 27