Quantitative microbial risk assessment and Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling: two case studies

被引:0
|
作者
O'Toole, J. [1 ]
Sinclair, M. [1 ]
Leder, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
FOOD AUSTRALIA | 2010年 / 62卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Pressure on the world's water supply has directed increasing attention to the use of recycled water in food production and processing. Municipal sewage, unless sufficiently treated, may provide a means by which pathogenic microorganisms enter the food chain through contaminated irrigation or wash water. Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling (AGWR) have been developed using the process of Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA). This process comprises four parts: hazard identification, dose response, exposure assessment, and risk characterisation and results in an output estimate of the burden of disease in a given population over a given period. QMRA may be used as a tool to promote science-based decision making processes, set priorities among different safety problems, identify gaps in scientific knowledge, and to improve control systems and develop guidelines. AGWR (Phase 1) specify a range of indicative treatment processes, exposure reductions and water quality objectives that support a fit-for-purpose approach in relation to using recycled water for non-potable uses. These include livestock drinking water, dairy shed wash down, pasture or fodder crop irrigation and irrigation of food crops (home grown and commercial). This paper discusses the QMRA process and assumptions made in relation to exposure estimates in AGWR guidelines using two case study examples, as well as outlining existing data gaps.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 412
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Practical applications of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for water safety plans
    Smeets, P. W. M. H.
    Rietveld, L. C.
    van Dijk, J. C.
    Medema, G. J.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (06) : 1561 - 1568
  • [22] RISK OF DISEASE DUE TO CONTAMINATION OF REFILL DRINKING WATER: USING QUANTITATIVE MICROBIAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Alfian, Azyyati Ridha
    Firdani, Fea
    Sari, Putri Nilam
    SURANAREE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 30 (03):
  • [23] Uniform Rotorcraft Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment
    Hewitt, John
    Braman, Gary
    2017 ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2017,
  • [24] Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
    Zabulione, Aelita
    Valdramidis, Vasilis P.
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21
  • [25] Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
    Zabulione, Aelita
    Valdramidis, Vasilis P.
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21
  • [26] Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
    Stratev, Deyan
    Valdramidis, Vasilis P.
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21
  • [27] 'Omics' technologies in quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Brul, S.
    Bassett, J.
    Cook, P.
    Kathariou, S.
    McClure, P.
    Jasti, P. R.
    Betts, R.
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 27 (01) : 12 - 24
  • [28] Sensitivity analysis in quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Zwietering, MH
    van Gerwen, SJC
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 58 (03) : 213 - 221
  • [29] Effects of a 20 year rain event: a quantitative microbial risk assessment of a case of contaminated bathing water in Copenhagen, Denmark
    Andersen, S. T.
    Erichsen, A. C.
    Mark, O.
    Albrechtsen, H-J.
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2013, 11 (04) : 636 - 646
  • [30] Prospective risk assessment for mixtures of agricultural chemicals in surface water: Results of two case studies
    Holmes, Christopher
    Hamer, Mick
    Brown, Colin
    Jones, Russell
    Maltby, Lorraine
    Silberhorn, Eric
    Teeter, Jerold
    Warne, Michael
    Weltje, Lennart
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 254