Quantifying Co-Benefits and Trade-Offs between Forest Ecosystem Services in the Gan River Basin of South China

被引:3
|
作者
Dai, Erfu [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoli [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Jianjia [3 ]
Tian, Qing [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Marine Data & Informat Serv Ctr, Tianjin 300171, Peoples R China
[3] Hebei Normal Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Hort Sci & Technol, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, Peoples R China
[4] George Mason Univ, Dept Computat Social Sci, 4400 Univ Dr, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ecosystem service; InVEST model; trade-off; forest plantation; Southern China; TIMBER PRODUCTION; CARBON STORAGE; BIODIVERSITY; WATER; CONSERVATION; HETEROGENEITY; PLANTATIONS; MANAGEMENT; SYNERGIES; PROVISION;
D O I
10.3390/su14148271
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forest ecosystem services are intrinsically linked. We design a spatially explicit approach to quantify and analyze the co-benefits and trade-offs between the main forest ecosystem services. Our goal is to develop criteria for forest management that include ecosystem service interactions. Chinese fir and pine plantations provide the largest portion of the overall ecosystem services currently provided. They are volume stock and water yield service hotspots, but these have negative effects on soil retention and carbon storage, causing environmental problems. The natural forests (broad-leaf and bamboo forests) are carbon storage and volume stock hotspots and show the lowest erosion modulus. Thus, their protection, combined with expanding the plantation area under forest management should be considered in order to increase ecosystem service synergies. In contrast, an increased area of broad-leaf plantations reduces water yield service due to their lower water production capacity, in comparison with plantations of fast-growing species. Our study shows that the inclusion of ecosystem services as part of forest management could provide opportunities for optimal allocation of forest resources and sustainable utilization. Management based only on economically beneficial ecosystem services can be detrimental to the forest ecosystem and can cause environmental problems.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Co-benefits and trade-offs between agriculture and conservation: A case study in Northern Australia
    Stoeckl, N.
    Chaiechi, T.
    Farr, M.
    Jarvis, D.
    Alvarez-Romero, J. G.
    Kennard, M. J.
    Hermoso, V.
    Pressey, R. L.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 191 : 478 - 494
  • [22] Co-benefits of and trade-offs between natural climate solutions and Sustainable Development Goals
    Mariani, Gael
    Moullec, Fabien
    Atwood, Trisha B.
    Clarkson, Beverley
    Conant, Richard T.
    Cullen-Unsworth, Leanne
    Griscom, Bronson
    Gutt, Julian
    Howard, Jennifer
    Krause-Jensen, Dorte
    Leavitt, Sara M.
    Lee, Shing Yip
    Livesley, Stephen J.
    Macreadie, Peter, I
    St-John, Michael
    Zganjar, Chris
    Cheung, William W. L.
    Duarte, Carlos M.
    Shin, Yunne-Jai
    Singh, Gerald G.
    Loiseau, Nicolas
    Troussellier, Marc
    Mouillot, David
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 22 (10)
  • [23] Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation
    Onaindia, Miren
    Fernandez de Manuel, Beatriz
    Madariaga, Iosu
    Rodriguez-Loinaz, Gloria
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 289 : 1 - 9
  • [24] Health co-benefits and trade-offs of carbon pricing: a narrative synthesis
    Cuevas, Soledad
    Nachtigall, Daniel
    Jaber, Aimee Aguilar
    Belesova, Kristine
    Falconer, Jane
    Haines, Andy
    Reynolds, Tamzin
    Schuster, Tobias Magnus
    Whitmee, Sarah
    Green, Rosemary
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2024, 24 (10) : 1346 - 1364
  • [25] Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services in a Mountain Region
    Briner, Simon
    Huber, Robert
    Bebi, Peter
    Elkin, Che
    Schmatz, Dirk R.
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03):
  • [26] Spatial Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China
    Xu, Qian
    Yang, Ying
    Yang, Ren
    Zha, Li-Si
    Lin, Zi-Qing
    Shang, Shu-Hao
    LAND, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [27] Spatiotemporal Changes and Trade-Offs/Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Qin-Mang River Basin
    Zhao, Jiwei
    Wang, Luyao
    Jia, Dong
    Wang, Yaowen
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [28] The Trade-Offs and Synergistic Relationships between Grassland Ecosystem Functions in the Yellow River Basin
    Yang, Jie
    Xie, Baopeng
    Zhang, Degang
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (10):
  • [29] Ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Basin and their trade-offs/synergies relationships in response to climate change
    Xu, Yuqing
    Hou, Ruiping
    Xiao, Fengjin
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 6 (10):
  • [30] Driving Factors and Trade-Offs/Synergies Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Changes of Multiple Ecosystem Services in the Han River Basin, China
    Han, Peidong
    Yang, Guang
    Wang, Zijun
    Liu, Yangyang
    Chen, Xu
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhang, Zhixin
    Wen, Zhongming
    Shi, Haijing
    Lin, Ziqi
    Ren, Hanyu
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (12)