Integrated project delivery implementation framework for water and wastewater treatment plant projects

被引:24
|
作者
Andary, Elie Georges [1 ]
Shdid, Caesar Abi [2 ]
Chowdhury, Arindam [3 ]
Ahmad, Irtishad [4 ]
机构
[1] Hazen & Sawyer, New York, NY USA
[2] Lebanese Amer Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Beirut, Lebanon
[3] Florida Int Univ, Coll Engn & Comp, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Amer Univ Sharjah, Dept Civil Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Construction; Project management; Novel model; DESIGN-BUILD; PERFORMANCE; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1108/ECAM-02-2019-0075
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose The public nature of water and wastewater construction capital projects has rendered design-bid-build (DBB) as the delivery method of choice for such projects over the past years. Shortcomings inherent to DBB have had a negative effect on the key performance indicators (KPIs) of these projects. Numerous studies have been published about the benefits offered by integrated project delivery (IPD) in improving the delivery of DBB projects. Links correlating IPD principles to improvements in KPIs of DBB construction projects have not been established scientifically, thus leaving owners with no guidance on which IPD principle(s) to implement in order to improve a particular project KPI. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach Actual data were collected from 43 water and wastewater construction projects - including two control projects with full implementation of selective IPD principles - and used to compute major projects KPIs. Regression analysis and a focus group are then utilized to determine the effect of each implemented IPD principle on various project KPIs. Findings Implementation of open communication was found to have a significant effect on reducing project cost overrun, and the co-location of teams significantly reduced the time to respond to RFIs. Collaborative decision making significantly reduced the cost of field rework. Other IPD principles showed less-significant effects on project KPIs and were concluded to be ineffective at improving the projects' performance. Practical implications - An implementation framework is developed that can guide utility owners on which IPD principle(s) to implement in order to improve specific project KPIs. Originality/value This study demonstrates that not all IPD principles will result in performance improvement of a project. A selective and cost-effective implementation of certain IPD principle will have to be based on the nature of the project and the particular KPIs targeted for improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 633
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrated Risk Framework for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems
    Steven Carroll
    Ashantha Goonetilleke
    Evan Thomas
    Megan Hargreaves
    Ray Frost
    Les Dawes
    Environmental Management, 2006, 38 : 286 - 303
  • [32] Integrated risk framework for onsite wastewater treatment systems
    Carroll, Steven
    Goonetilleke, Ashantha
    Thomas, Evan
    Hargreaves, Megan
    Frost, Ray
    Dawes, Les
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 38 (02) : 286 - 303
  • [33] A comparison of project delivery method performance for water infrastructure capital projects
    Feghaly, Jeffrey
    El Asmar, Mounir
    Ariaratnam, Samuel T.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 48 (06) : 691 - 701
  • [34] Wastewater Could Power Water Treatment Plant
    不详
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2010, 106 (11) : 5 - 5
  • [35] A framework for an automated and integrated project monitoring and control system for steel fabrication projects
    Azimi, Reza
    Lee, SangHyun
    AbouRizk, Simaan M.
    Alvanchi, Amin
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2011, 20 (01) : 88 - 97
  • [36] Integrated project delivery as integration between solution development and solution implementation
    Mihic, Matej
    Sertic, Josip
    Zavrski, Ivica
    SELECTED PAPERS FROM THE 27TH IPMA (INTERNATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION), 2014, 119 : 557 - 565
  • [37] Application of Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) in the Middle East: Implementation and Challenges
    Sherif, Mohamed
    Abotaleb, Ibrahim
    Alqahtani, Fahad K.
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [38] Effective Risk Assessment of Complicated EPC Projects: A Case Study of Wastewater Treatment Plant Projects
    Vo, Huy Minh
    Yang, Jyh-Bin
    Rangasamy, Veerakumar
    ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 2025, 11 (02)
  • [39] Framework for the coordinated application of two different integrated project delivery platforms
    Monteiro, Andre
    Meda, Pedro
    Martins, Joao Pocas
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 38 : 87 - 99
  • [40] A framework for implementing integrated project delivery in architecture design firms in Egypt
    Othman, Ayman Ahmed Ezzat
    Youssef, Lamis Yasser Wagih
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 19 (03) : 721 - 757