Local Latin hypercube refinement for multi-objective design uncertainty optimization®

被引:10
|
作者
Bogoclu, Can [1 ,2 ]
Roos, Dirk [2 ]
Nestorovic, Tamara [1 ]
机构
[1] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Inst Computat Engn, Mech Adapt Syst, Univ Str 150,Bldg ICFW 03-725, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
[2] Niederrhein Univ Appl Sci, Fac Mech & Proc Engn, Inst Modelling & High Performance Comp, Reinarzstr 49, D-47805 Krefeld, Germany
关键词
Multi-objective reliability-based robust design optimization; Surrogate model; Sequential sampling; Gaussian process; Support vector regression; RELIABILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION; RESPONSE-SURFACE METHOD; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; CRASHWORTHINESS DESIGN; GENETIC ALGORITHM; METHODOLOGY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107807
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Optimizing the reliability and the robustness of a design is important but often unaffordable due to high sample requirements. Surrogate models based on statistical and machine learning methods are used to increase the sample efficiency. However, for higher dimensional or multi-modal systems, surrogate models may also require a large amount of samples to achieve good results. We propose a sequential sampling strategy for the surrogate based solution of multi-objective reliability based robust design optimization problems. Proposed local Latin hypercube refinement (LoLHR) strategy is model-agnostic and can be combined with any surrogate model because there is no free lunch but possibly a budget one. The proposed method is compared to stationary sampling as well as other proposed strategies from the literature. Gaussian process and support vector regression are both used as surrogate models. Empirical evidence is presented, showing that LoLHR achieves on average better results compared to other surrogate based strategies on the tested examples. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-objective Optimization for the Design of Salary Structures
    Tremblay, Francois-Alexandre
    Piche-Meunier, Dominique
    Dubois, Louis
    INTEGRATION OF CONSTRAINT PROGRAMMING, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, AND OPERATIONS RESEARCH, CPAIOR 2023, 2023, 13884 : 427 - 442
  • [42] Multi-objective optimization and design of farming systems
    Groot, Jeroen C. J.
    Oomen, Gerard J. M.
    Rossing, Walter A. H.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2012, 110 : 63 - 77
  • [43] Multi-objective Design Optimization of Sandwich Panel
    Benzo, Pier Giovanni
    Sena-Cruz, Jose
    Pereira, Joao M.
    10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FRP COMPOSITES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING (CICE 2020/2021), 2022, 198 : 2347 - 2354
  • [44] Multi-objective optimization design of spherical transducer
    Zhang, Xi
    Li, Hongguang
    Zhao, Xie
    Xiong, Hanlin
    Meng, Guang
    Shengxue Xuebao/Acta Acustica, 2023, 48 (04): : 872 - 881
  • [45] Multi-objective optimization in reliability based design
    El Sayed, MF
    Edghill, M
    Housner, J
    COMPUTER AIDED OPTIMUM DESIGN OF STRUCTURES VI, 1999, 5 : 161 - 169
  • [46] AN AXIOMATIC DESIGN APPROACH TO MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION
    Tarcan, Esin
    Kar, A. Kerim
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 10TH BIENNIAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND ANALYSIS, 2010, VOL 4, 2010, : 539 - 544
  • [47] Multi-objective optimization of oil tanker design
    Papanikolaou, Apostolos
    Zaraphonitis, George
    Boulougouris, Evangelos
    Langbecker, Uwe
    Matho, Sven
    Sames, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 15 (04) : 359 - 373
  • [48] Multi-objective optimization design for a magnetorheological damper
    Jiang, Min
    Rui, Xiaoting
    Yang, Fufeng
    Zhu, Wei
    Zhang, Yanni
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 2022, 33 (01) : 33 - 45
  • [49] Multi-objective design optimization of automatic fixturing
    El-Sayed, J
    King, LSB
    COMPUTER AIDED OPTIMUM DESIGN OF STRUCTURES VIII, 2003, 13 : 3 - 13
  • [50] Multi-objective Discrete Rotor Design Optimization
    M'laouhi, Ibrahim
    Ben Guedria, Najeh
    Smaoui, Hichem
    CONDITION MONITORING OF MACHINERY IN NON-STATIONARY OPERATIONS, 2012, : 193 - 200