Distributional health and financial consequences of increased cigarette tax in Iran: extended cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Raei, Behzad [1 ]
Emamgholipour, Sara [1 ]
Takian, Amirhossein [1 ,2 ]
Yaseri, Mehdi [3 ]
Abdoli, Ghahreman [4 ]
Alizadeh, Ahad [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Econ, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Hlth Equ Res Ctr HERC, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran, Fac Econ, Tehran, Iran
[5] Qazvin Univ Med Sci, Metab Dis Res Ctr, Res Inst Prevent Noncommunicable Dis, Qazvin, Iran
关键词
Taxes; Elasticity; Cigarette smoking; Outcome assessment; SMOKING; DISEASE; SMOKERS; BURDEN; PRICE;
D O I
10.1186/s13561-021-00328-w
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background To assess the potential impact of a tax-induced cigarette price increase on financial and health outcomes by different socioeconomic groups. Methods In a modeled condition using pooled cross-section data from Household Income and Expenditure Survey (2002-2017) and Iran 2019 population data, a methodology of an extended cost effectiveness analysis (ECEA) was applied to model the impact on cigarette consumption of hypothetically increased cigarette tax. The methodology was employed to evaluate: [1] health benefits (premature deaths averted); [2] health expenditures regarding smoking-related disease treatment averted; [3] additional tax revenues raised; [4] change in household expenditures on cigarettes; and [5] financial risk protection among male Iranian smokers in a time span of 60 years following a one-time increase in cigarette price of 75%. The Stata version 15.1 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA) was used to perform the relevant analysis and estimate regression models. Results A 75% increase in cigarettes price through taxation would reduce the number of smokers by more than half a million, 11% of them in the poorest quintile; save about 1.9 million years of life (11% of which would be gained in the lowest quintile compared to 20% in the highest one); eliminate a total of US$196.4 million of health expenditures (9% of which would benefit the bottom quintile). Such a policy could raise the additional annual tax revenues by roughly US$ 1 billion, where the top two quintiles bear around 46% of the total tax burden. We estimated that the tax increase would avert an estimated 56,287 cases of catastrophic expenditure that wholly concentrated among the bottom two expenditure quintiles. Conclusion Increasing cigarette tax can provide health and financial benefits, and would be pro-poor in terms of health gains, Out-of-Pocket (OOP) savings, and financial risk protection against smoking-related diseases.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing the effectiveness of health interventions for cost-effectiveness analysis
    Mandelblatt, JS
    Fryback, DG
    Weinstein, MC
    Russell, LB
    Gold, MR
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 12 (09) : 551 - 558
  • [42] Assessing the effectiveness of health interventions for cost-effectiveness analysis
    Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
    Dennis G. Fryback
    Milton C. Weinstein
    Louise B. Russell
    Marthe R. Gold
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1997, 12 : 551 - 558
  • [43] Improving health equity and ending the HIV epidemic in the USA: a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis in six cities
    Quan, Amanda My Linh
    Mah, Cassandra
    Krebs, Emanuel
    Zang, Xiao
    Chen, Siyuan
    Althoff, Keri
    Armstrong, Wendy
    Behrends, Czarina Navos
    Dombrowski, Julia C.
    Enns, Eva
    Feaster, Daniel J.
    Gebo, Kelly A.
    Goedel, William C.
    Golden, Matthew
    Marshall, Brandon D. L.
    Mehta, Shruti H.
    Pandya, Ankur
    Schackman, Bruce R.
    Strathdee, Steffanie A.
    Sullivan, Patrick
    Tookes, Hansel
    Nosyk, Bohdan
    LANCET HIV, 2021, 8 (09): : E581 - E590
  • [44] Aggregate distributional cost-effectiveness analysis: a novel tool for health economic evaluation to inform resource allocation
    Shan Jiang
    Boyang Li
    Bonny Parkinson
    Shunping Li
    Yuanyuan Gu
    Global Health Research and Policy, 10 (1)
  • [45] The distributional impact of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: findings from an extended cost-effectiveness analysis in South Africa
    Saxena, Akshar
    Stacey, Nicholas
    Puech, Paula Del Ray
    Mudara, Caroline
    Hofman, Karen
    Verguet, Stephane
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4 (04):
  • [46] TIME PREFERENCE FOR HEALTH IN COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    LIPSCOMB, J
    MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) : S233 - S253
  • [47] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS IN HEALTH-CARE
    EMERY, DD
    SCHNEIDERMAN, LJ
    HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1989, 19 (04) : 8 - 13
  • [48] Valuing health for regulatory cost-effectiveness analysis
    Salkeld, Glenn
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 31 (01) : 93 - 93
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness analysis - a health policy perspective
    Maini, BS
    SURGERY, 1999, 126 (05) : 989 - 989
  • [50] The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine
    Russell, LB
    Gold, MR
    Siegel, JE
    Daniels, N
    Weinstein, MC
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (14): : 1172 - 1177