Behavioral and Psychological Outcomes Associated with Skin Cancer Genetic Testing in Albuquerque Primary Care

被引:8
|
作者
Hay, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Kaphingst, Kimberly A. [2 ]
Buller, David [3 ]
Schofield, Elizabeth [1 ]
White, Kirsten Meyer [4 ]
Sussman, Andrew [5 ]
Guest, Dolores [6 ]
Dailey, Yvonne T. [6 ]
Robers, Erika [6 ]
Schwartz, Matthew R. [6 ]
Li, Yuelin [1 ]
Hunley, Keith [7 ]
Berwick, Marianne [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Ctr, Canc Commun Res, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Klein Buendel Inc, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[4] New Mexico VA Hlth Syst, Vet Hlth Adm, Albuquerque, NM 87108 USA
[5] Univ New Mexico, Dept Family & Community Med, Albuquerque, NM 87102 USA
[6] Univ New Mexico, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Albuquerque, NM 87102 USA
[7] Univ New Mexico, Dept Anthropol, Albuquerque, NM 87102 USA
[8] Univ New Mexico, Dept Internal Med, Albuquerque, NM 87102 USA
[9] Univ New Mexico, Dept Dermatol, Albuquerque, NM 87102 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
genetic testing; sun protection; primary care; Hispanics; skin cancer risk; CUTANEOUS MELANOMA; POOLED-ANALYSIS; SUN EXPOSURE; IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE; GENOMIC MEDICINE; MC1R VARIANTS; CURRENT STATE; RISK-FACTORS; INFORMATION; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.3390/cancers13164053
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Genetic information is publicly available but research examining the best use of such information has not engaged diverse members of the public. We examined public reactions to melanoma genetic testing (using the melanocortin-1 receptor [MC1R] gene) in a study randomizing (like the flip of a coin) 600 diverse primary care patients to a MC1R test offer or usual care. We found that testing did not improve sun protection and skin cancer screening, nor did it lead worry to increase. However, groups less aware of their skin cancer risk, including those who thought their risk was "unlikely" at the start of the study, showed significant improvements in sun protection at three months. In conclusion, testing might be very helpful for certain people who have the most to learn about their risk, who may become motivated to protect themselves from the damaging effects of the sun as a result of skin cancer genetic testing. Public availability of genetic information is increasing; thus, efforts to improve diversity in basic and translational research in genomics is a top priority. Given the increasing U.S. incidence and mortality of melanoma, and the prevalence of common melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene melanoma risk variants in the general population, we examined genomic testing of MC1R for skin cancer risk in a randomized controlled trial in Albuquerque, New Mexico primary care. Participants were 48% Hispanic and were randomized 5:1 to a MC1R test invitation or usual care. We assessed 3 month sun protection, skin cancer screening, and skin cancer worry outcomes associated with testing, and key effect moderators (e.g., cancer risk perceptions, and skin cancer risk factors). Our findings indicate that the primary outcomes were unchanged by the MC1R test offer, test acceptance, and level of risk feedback. Moderator analyses showed that those with lower risk perception, and those with skin that readily tans, significantly increased their sun protection in response to higher than average risk feedback. Risk feedback did not prompt cancer worry, and average risk feedback did not erode existing sun protection. This study paves the way for the development of tailored strategies to address low skin cancer risk awareness in this understudied context of public health genomics.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing
    Heshka, Jodi T.
    Palleschi, Crystal
    Howley, Heather
    Wilson, Brenda
    Wells, Philip S.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 10 (01) : 19 - 32
  • [32] Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review
    Butow, PN
    Lobb, EA
    Meiser, B
    Barratt, A
    Tucker, KM
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2003, 178 (02) : 77 - 81
  • [33] Psychological and behavioral effects of genetic risk testing for obesity: a systematic review
    Cheera, Emily K.
    Klarich, DawnKylee S.
    Hong, Mee Young
    PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (03) : 265 - 277
  • [34] Genetic testing in care of cancer patients
    Weissflog, G
    Singer, S
    Schwarz, R
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2004, 13 (08) : S83 - S84
  • [35] Preliminary outcomes of a primary care-based skin cancer screening program.
    Ferris, Laura
    Saul, Melissa
    Lin, Yan
    Weinstock, Martin A.
    Geller, Alan
    Solano, Francis
    Neuren, Erica Bromberg
    Kirkwood, John M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [37] Exploring the role of cancer fatalism and engagement with skin cancer genetic information in diverse primary care patients
    Hay, Jennifer L.
    Wu, Yelena
    Schofield, Elizabeth
    Kaphingst, Kim
    Sussman, Andrew L.
    Guest, Delores D.
    Hunley, Keith
    Li, Yuelin
    Buller, David
    Berwick, Marianne
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 33 (04)
  • [38] Direct access cancer testing in primary care: a systematic review of use and clinical outcomes
    Smith, Claire Friedemann
    Tompson, Alice C.
    Jones, Nicholas
    Brewin, Josh
    Spencer, Elizabeth A.
    Bankhead, Clare R.
    Hobbs, F. D. Richard
    Nicholson, Brian D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (674): : E594 - E603
  • [39] Genetic testing for cancer risks: decisions and outcomes
    Lerman, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, : 20 - 20
  • [40] ENGAGEMENT WITH GENETIC TESTING AMONG PRIMARY CARE PATIENTS
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2022, 56 (SUPP 1) : S80 - S80