Does the Porter hypothesis hold in China? Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot policy

被引:29
|
作者
Shen, Weiping [1 ]
Wang, Yong [2 ]
Luo, Weijie [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Social Sci, Dept Urban Dev & Environm Studies, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Inst Finance & Banking, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Ctr China Fiscal Dev, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
low-carbon city pilot policy; total factor productivity; Porter hypothesis; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; AIR-POLLUTION; REGULATIONS; COMPETITIVENESS; PRODUCTIVITY; INNOVATION; GROWTH; PERFORMANCE; TRADE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/15140326.2020.1858224
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Given the constraints of energy, environment, and climate change in the process of economic development, transitioning to a low-carbon economy by such means as the construction of low-carbon cities is a feasible approach to a sustainable development pattern that balances energy conservation, environmental protection, and economic growth. Utilizing the data of listed companies in China A-shares market over the period 2007-2016, we treat China's low-carbon city pilot policy (LCCPP) as a quasi-natural experiment and adopt a difference-in-differences approach to explore the effect of LCCPP on the total factor productivity (TFP) of firms. Firm TFP is found to be negatively associated with the implementation of LCCPP. Our mechanism analysis reveals that the LCCPP stimulates innovation by firms in China, consistent with the weak Porter hypothesis. Moreover, the negative relationship between the LCCPP and TFP holds more strongly in larger firms or those located in the eastern region.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 269
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Low-carbon city pilot policy and corporate environmental violations: Evidence from heavily polluting firms in China
    Wang, Juling
    Liu, Lihua
    Ou, Yangchao
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 65
  • [42] Retesting the Innovation Motivation Effect of the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy in China: Evidence from Supply Chains
    Xu, Qianqian
    Zhu, Shuzhen
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2024, 33 (06): : 6459 - 6471
  • [43] Does the low-carbon city pilot scheme enhance urban total environmental quality? Evidence from China
    Hu, Zheneng
    Lan, Xiujuan
    Gong, Jianjiao
    Zhang, Zhuoya
    Wen, Chuanhao
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [44] Can low-carbon city construction facilitate green growth? Evidence from China's pilot low-carbon city initiative
    Cheng, Jinhua
    Yi, Jiahui
    Dai, Sheng
    Xiong, Yan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 : 1158 - 1170
  • [45] Has China's low-carbon strategy pushed forward the digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises? Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot policy
    Zhao, Shuang
    Zhang, Liqun
    An, Haiyan
    Peng, Lin
    Zhou, Haiyan
    Hu, Feng
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 102
  • [46] Does the low-carbon city policy make a difference? Empirical evidence of the pilot scheme in China with DEA and PSM-DID
    Fu, Yang
    He, Chenyang
    Luo, Ling
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 122
  • [47] Going carbon-neutral in China: Does the low-carbon city pilot policy improve carbon emission efficiency
    Zhang, Hua
    Feng, Chao
    Zhou, Xiaoxiao
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 33 : 312 - 329
  • [48] Does Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Alleviate Urban Haze Pollution? Empirical Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China
    Yan, Jinling
    Zhao, Junfeng
    Yang, Xiaodong
    Su, Xufeng
    Wang, Hailing
    Ran, Qiying
    Shen, Jianliang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (21)
  • [49] Is smart city low-carbon? Evidence from China
    Zhu, Xiongwei
    Li, Dezhi
    Zhu, Shiyao
    Ting, ShiAn
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (16)
  • [50] Can the low-carbon city pilot policy promote the upgrading of high-carbon emitting enterprises? Evidence from China
    Wang, Chang'an
    Lin, Kun
    Liu, Xiaoqian
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF POPULATION RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 20 (03) : 217 - 226