A Design Model of Distributed Scaffolding for Inquiry-Based Learning

被引:23
|
作者
Hsu, Ying-Shao [1 ]
Lai, Ting-Ling [2 ]
Hsu, Wei-Hsiu [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Grad Inst Sci Educ, Taipei 11677, Taiwan
[2] Tamkang Univ, Dept Educ Technol, New Taipei City, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Normal Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Taipei 11677, Taiwan
关键词
Scaffolding; Inquiry-based learning; Distributed scaffolding; Scientific inquiry; Technology-infused learning; Plate tectonics; PROBLEM-SOLVING PROCESSES; KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION; SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY; QUESTION PROMPTS; CAUSAL-MODELS; SCIENCE; STUDENTS; PEER; FRAMEWORK; SOFTWARE;
D O I
10.1007/s11165-014-9421-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study presents a series of three experiments that focus on how distributed scaffolding influences learners' conceptual understanding and reasoning from combined levels of triangulation, at the interactive level (discourses within a focus group) and the collective level (class). Three inquiry lessons on plate tectonics (LPT) were designed, implemented and redesigned to explore how students responded to the scaffoldings provided. The results show that the goal-oriented version (LPT3) was significantly more effective at helping students develop an understanding of plate tectonics and evidence-based reasoning than the teacher-led (LPT1) and deconstructed (LPT2) versions (chi (2) = 11.56, p < 0.003). In LPT3, we can identify three key features of the scaffolding: an advanced organizer, deconstruction of complex tasks, and reflection on the whole inquiry cycle at the end of class time. In addition, LPT3 took much less teaching time. In other words, it appears to be effective and efficient, most likely due to synergies between teacher facilitation and lesson scaffolds. The empirical results clarify the functions of the design model proposed for distributed scaffolding: navigating inquiry, structuring tasks, supporting communication, and fostering reflection. Future studies should more closely evaluate the scaffolding system as a whole and synergies between different types of scaffolds for advancing learning.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 273
页数:33
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inquiry-based learning and the international student
    Bache, Ian
    Hayton, Richard
    TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 17 (04) : 411 - 423
  • [22] Inquiry-based Learning of Proteomics and Metabolomics
    Nezhyva, Mariya
    Aerts, Jordan T.
    Sandbaumhu''ter, Friederike A.
    Vallianatou, Theodosia
    Jansson, Erik T.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 101 (02) : 521 - 529
  • [23] Information literacy for inquiry-based learning
    Goncalves Dias Gasque, Kelley Cristine
    TRANSINFORMACAO, 2016, 28 (03): : 253 - 262
  • [24] Inquiry-Based Learning Activities in Dynamics
    Self, Brian P.
    Widmann, James M.
    Prince, Michael J.
    Georgette, Jeffrey
    2013 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2013,
  • [25] Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design
    Edelson, DC
    Gordin, DN
    Pea, RD
    JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 1999, 8 (3-4) : 391 - 450
  • [26] A flipped classroom model for inquiry-based learning in primary education context
    Loizou, Maria
    Lee, Kyungmee
    RESEARCH IN LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 28 : 1 - 18
  • [27] The effect of inquiry-based learning model on health-related fitness
    Uzunosmanoglu, Elanur
    Gursel, Ferda
    Arslan, Fanna
    CYPRUS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (CY-ICER-2012), 2012, 47 : 1906 - 1910
  • [28] INQUIRY-BASED SCIENCE LEARNING IN DIGITAL AGE: RETHINKING THE SAMR MODEL
    Tsybulsky, Dina
    Levin, Ilya
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (EDULEARN17), 2017, : 42 - 46
  • [29] INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING MEETS LEARNING ANALYTICS AND STYLES
    Bedek, Michael A.
    Mack, Juergen
    Albert, Dietrich
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (EDULEARN17), 2017, : 2140 - 2146
  • [30] A Path Model of Effective Technology-Intensive Inquiry-Based Learning
    Avsec, Stanislav
    Kocijancic, Slavko
    EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2016, 19 (01): : 308 - 320