Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma (MM): High-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF vs. G-CSF alone

被引：0
|
作者：
Goldschmidt, H [1 ]
Hegenbart, U [1 ]
Cremer, FW [1 ]
Kiel, K [1 ]
Moos, M [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Internal Med 5, Heidelberg, Germany
来源：
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY | 1998年 / 102卷 / 01期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：72 / 72
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of G-CSF plus CFA vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in children with malignant diseases.
    Vazquez, JE
    Jimenez, E
    Ibarra, E
    Ayometzi, MT
    Bello, SA
    Martinez, A
    BLOOD, 2001, 98 (11) : 334B - 334B
  • [42] Failure of adequate mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) with chemotherapy and G-CSF:: G-CSF alone is superior to chemotherapy plus G-CSF for 2nd mobilization.
    Fraipont, V
    Sautois, B
    Baudoux, E
    Pereira, M
    Fassotte, MF
    Jerusalem, G
    Hermanne, JP
    Longrée, L
    Schaaf-Lafontaine, N
    Sondag, D
    Fillet, G
    Beguin, Y
    BLOOD, 1998, 92 (10) : 268A - 268A
  • [43] Correction to: Comparison of the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes in two stem cell mobilization regimens with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis
    Liwen Wang
    Hongxian Xiang
    Yuhan Yan
    Zuqun Deng
    Hui Li
    Xin Li
    Jing Liu
    Annals of Hematology, 2021, 100 : 575 - 575
  • [44] Randomized comparison of G-CSF+GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells: effects on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy
    Spitzer, G
    Adkins, D
    Mathews, M
    Velasquez, W
    Bowers, C
    Dunphy, F
    Kronmueller, N
    Niemeyer, R
    McIntyre, W
    Petruska, P
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 20 (11) : 921 - 930
  • [45] G-CSF Alone vs cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in PBPC mobilization of patients with lymphoma: results depend on degree of previous pretreatment
    G Milone
    S Leotta
    F Indelicato
    S Mercurio
    G Moschetti
    F Di Raimondo
    A Tornello
    U Consoli
    G Guido
    R Giustolisi
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2003, 31 : 747 - 754
  • [46] Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization using sequential G-CSF alone followed by CTX/VP-16/G-CSF
    Akard, LP
    Dugan, MJ
    Greenspan, A
    Hanks, S
    Thompson, JM
    Wiemann, MC
    Jansen, J
    BLOOD, 1996, 88 (10) : 3655 - 3655
  • [47] PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELL MOBILIZATION USING HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AND G-CSF IN PRETREATED PATIENTS WITH LYMPHOMA
    CRAIG, JIO
    ANTHONY, RS
    STEWART, A
    THOMSON, EB
    GILLON, J
    PARKER, AC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1993, 85 (01) : 210 - 212
  • [48] G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis
    A Antar
    Z K Otrock
    M A Kharfan-Dabaja
    H A Ghaddara
    N Kreidieh
    R Mahfouz
    A Bazarbachi
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2015, 50 : 813 - 817
  • [49] G-CSF Alone vs cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in PBPC mobilization of patients with lymphoma:: results depend on degree of previous pretreatment
    Milone, G
    Leotta, S
    Indelicato, F
    Mercurio, S
    Moschetti, G
    Di Raimondo, F
    Tornello, A
    Consoli, U
    Guido, G
    Giustolisi, R
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 31 (09) : 747 - 754
  • [50] G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis
    Antar, A.
    Otrock, Z. K.
    Kharfan-Dabaja, M. A.
    Ghaddara, H. A.
    Kreidieh, N.
    Mahfouz, R.
    Bazarbachi, A.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 50 (06) : 813 - 817
12345