High-quality endoscope reprocessing decreases endoscope contamination

被引:25
|
作者
Decristoforo, P. [1 ]
Kaltseis, J. [1 ]
Fritz, A. [1 ]
Edlinger, M. [2 ]
Posch, W. [1 ]
Wilflingseder, D. [1 ]
Lass-Floerl, C. [1 ]
Orth-Hoeller, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Innsbruck, Div Hyg & Med Microbiol, Schopfstr 41, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Med Stat Informat & Hlth Econ, Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Automated endoscope reprocessor; Contamination; Gastrointestinal endoscope; Guideline; High-level disinfection; Microbiological surveillance; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; TRANSMISSION; INFECTION; SURVEILLANCE; COLONOSCOPY; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.017
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: Several outbreaks of severe infections due to contamination of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes, mainly duodenoscopes, have been described. The rate of microbial endoscope contamination varies dramatically in literature. The aim of this multicentre prospective study was to evaluate the hygiene quality of endoscopes and automated endoscope reprocessors (AERs) in Tyrol/Austria. Methods: In 2015 and 2016, a total of 463 GI endoscopes and 105 AERs from 29 endoscopy centres were analysed by a routine (R) and a combined routine and advanced (CRA) sampling procedure and investigated for microbial contamination by culture-based and molecular-based analyses. Results: The contamination rate of GI endoscopes was 1.3%-4.6% according to the national guideline, suggesting that 1.3-4.6 patients out of 100 could have had contacts with hygiene-relevant microorganisms through an endoscopic intervention. Comparison of R and CRA sampling showed 1.8% of R versus 4.6% of CRA failing the acceptance criteria in phase I and 1.3% of R versus 3.0% of CRA samples failing in phase II. The most commonly identified indicator organism was Pseudomonas spp., mainly Pseudomonas oleovorans. None of the tested viruses were detected in 40 samples. While AERs in phase I failed (n = 9, 17.6%) mainly due to technical faults, phase II revealed lapses (n = 6, 11.5%) only on account of microbial contamination of the last rinsing water, mainly with Pseudomonas spp. Conclusions: In the present study the contamination rate of endoscopes was low compared with results from other European countries, possibly due to the high quality of endoscope reprocessing, drying and storage. (c) 2018 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1101.e1 / 1101.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] GI endoscope reprocessing: Microbiologic surveillance.
    Pazzi, P
    Fiorini, S
    Manzalini, CM
    Pezzoli, A
    Merighi, A
    Gullini, S
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (04) : AB66 - AB66
  • [32] Endoscope reprocessing-resource consumption and emissions
    Crisciotti, Carlotta
    Fugazza, Alessandro
    Menini, Maddalena
    Marco, Spadaccini
    Vanni, Elena
    Fumagalli, Alberto
    Oliva, Paolo
    Rizkala, Tommy
    Hassan, Cesare
    Giordano, Serena
    Iacovino, Rosaria
    Repici, Alessandro
    GUT, 2025,
  • [33] Challenges in achieving effective high-level disinfection in endoscope reprocessing
    Ofstead, Cori L.
    Hopkins, Krystina M.
    Buro, Brandy L.
    Eiland, John E.
    Wetzler, Harry P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2020, 48 (03) : 309 - 315
  • [34] The importance of endoscope reprocessing to the prevention of disease transmission
    Muscarella, Lawrence F.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2008, 31 (02) : 170 - 170
  • [35] Is bacteriologic surveillance in endoscope reprocessing stringent enough?
    Kovaleva, J.
    Meessen, N. E. L.
    Peters, F. T. M.
    Been, M. H.
    Arends, J. P.
    Borgers, R. P.
    Degener, J. E.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 41 (10) : 913 - 916
  • [36] BUILDING QUALITY INTO ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSING: WOULD YOU BE SCOPED IN YOUR OWN UNIT?
    Schlossberg, Nancy S.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2019, 42 (02) : 211 - 212
  • [37] HYGEA (Hygiene in gastroenterology endoscope reprocessing): Study on quality of reprocessing flexible endoscopes in hospitals and in the practice setting
    Bader, L
    Blumenstock, G
    Birkner, B
    Leiss, O
    Heesemann, J
    Riemann, JF
    Selbmann, HK
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2002, 40 (03): : 157 - 170
  • [38] High-level endoscope disinfection processes in emerging economies: financial impact of manual process versus automated endoscope reprocessing
    Funk, S. E.
    Reaven, N. L.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2014, 86 (04) : 250 - 254
  • [39] The Improvement of Endoscope Reprocessing with ATP-Bioluminescence Tool
    Gedik, Habip
    Gunay, Leyla
    Sahin, Ezgi Ceren
    Sharifzade, Mehriban
    ANNALS OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, 2018, 8 : 6 - 9
  • [40] Assessment of a novel approach to evaluate the outcome of endoscope reprocessing
    Tietz, A
    Dangel, M
    Widmer, AF
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 25 (11): : 897 - 899