Term induction of labour in nulliparous women: When to draw the line?

被引:1
|
作者
Mitchell, Jill M. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Dicker, Patrick [2 ]
Madigan, Grace [1 ]
Nicholson, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Smyth, Suzanne [1 ,2 ]
Breathnach, Fionnuala M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rotunda Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Royal Coll Surg, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Rotunda Hosp, Obstet & Gynaecol, 57 Parnell Sq West, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Univ Matern Hosp Limerick, Ennis Rd, Limerick, Ireland
关键词
Induction of labour; Cervical ripening; Dinoprostone; Prostaglandin; Perinatal outcomes; BISHOP SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eurox.2022.100148
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: There exists uncertainty surrounding the most effective and efficient means of inducing labour, particularly in the setting of an unfavourable cervix. This study aims to determine the merit of repeating dinoprostone administration when a single application has failed to render the cervix favourable for amniotomy.Study design: Retrospective analysis of a consecutive cohort of nulliparous women who underwent term induction of labour in a tertiary referral centre in Ireland was conducted over a 12-month period (December 2019 to January 2021). The time-interval from dinoprostone administration to delivery and the incidence of complicated birth, associated with single and sequential dinoprostone dosing, were determined. Comparisons were made using the Chi-square test and logistic regression adjusting for gestational age delivery.Results: 586 nulliparous women underwent term induction of labour during the study period. Administration of a single dose of dinoprostone or amniotomy alone were associated with the greatest prospect of an uncomplicated vaginal birth when compared to sequential dinoprostone dosing. Nonetheless, just one in four nulliparous women undergoing induction of labour experienced an unassisted and uncomplicated vaginal birth. The median [interquartile range] for time interval from induction to delivery or decision for caesarean delivery was 0.4 [0.3-0.6] days in those who underwent amniotomy alone, compared to 1.1 [0.7-1.5] days, 1.8 [1.4-2.2] days and 2.2 [2.0-2.6] days for those with 1, 2 or 3 doses of dinoprostone, respectively (p < 0.001 between all groups; Figure 1)Conclusion: These contemporaneous data indicate that in circumstances where more than a single dose of dinoprostone is required for cervical priming in a nulliparous woman, the incidence of an uncomplicated vaginal delivery decreased from more than half of women to less than one third. Over one third of women who were administered either a single dose of dinoprostone or more than one dose experienced an emergency intrapartum Caesarean delivery or a complicated vaginal birth. These findings are relevant to nulliparous women undergoing induction of labour in the setting of an unfavourable cervix and should be incorporated into shared decision making consultations, particularly when repeat administration of dinoprostone is being considered.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Classification of Indications for Caesarean Section: Nulliparous Women after Induction of Labour with a Cephalic Fetus at Term (Robson Group 2A)
    Lyon, J.
    Kempe, P.
    Robson, M.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 62 : 40 - 40
  • [22] Labor Induction and the Risk of a Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women at Term
    Ehrenthal, Deborah B.
    Jiang, Xiaozhang
    Strobino, Donna M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (01): : 35 - 42
  • [23] Nonmedically indicated induction vs expectant treatment in term nulliparous women
    Bailit, Jennifer L.
    Grobman, William
    Zhao, Yuan
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Iams, Jay D.
    Tita, Alan T.
    Saade, George
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Blackwell, Sean C.
    Tolosa, Jorge E.
    VanDorsten, J. Peter
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : 103.e1 - 103.e7
  • [24] Predicting Vaginal Delivery in Nulliparous Women Undergoing Induction of Labor at Term
    Kawakita, T.
    Reddy, U. M.
    Huang, C. C.
    Auguste, T. C.
    Bauer, D.
    Overcash, R. T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (07) : 660 - 668
  • [25] Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women
    Seyb, ST
    Berka, RJ
    Socol, ML
    Dooley, SL
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (04): : 600 - 607
  • [26] Timing of induction of labour and outcomes in women with term PROM
    Lipworth, H.
    Barrett, J.
    O'Rinn, S.
    Berghella, V
    Melamed, N.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 151 - 151
  • [27] Induction of labour should be offered to all women at term AGAINST: Induction of labour should not be offered to all women at term: first, do no harm
    Seijmonsbergen-Schermers, Anna E.
    Scherjon, Sicco
    De Jonge, Ank
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 (13) : 1599 - 1599
  • [28] Induction of labour for postdates in nulliparous women with uncomplicated pregnancy - is the caesarean section rate really lower?
    Mahomed, K.
    Pungsornruk, K.
    Gibbons, K.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 36 (07) : 916 - 920
  • [29] Postdate pregnancy in nulliparous women: induction of labour at 42 weeks is inefficient - it is time for management change
    Matiluko, A.
    Galimberti, A.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 104 - 104
  • [30] Indications and results of labour induction in nulliparous women: An interview among obstetricians, residents and clinical midwives
    Vellekoop, Jorik
    Vrouenraets, Francis P. J. M.
    van der Steeg, Jan Willem
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Roumen, Frans J. M. E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 146 (02) : 156 - 159