Imbalance measurement of regional economic quality development: evidence from China

被引:13
|
作者
Liu, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Shengxia [1 ]
Lu, Xiaoli [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Stat, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Key Lab Megareg Sustainable Dev Modelling, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
来源
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE | 2020年 / 65卷 / 02期
关键词
R1; R5; C13; C22; E31; INEQUALITY; DECOMPOSITION; DISPARITIES;
D O I
10.1007/s00168-020-00994-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Imbalance of regional development trends is strongly correlated over time and across provinces, paralleled the growth of the economic quality and even influenced by exogenous variables. In this paper, a regional 'two-way' theory based on 'input and output' is proposed, reflecting the current state of economic quality development comprehensively. An 'inverse absolute dispersion method' came up with calculating the Quality of Economic Imbalance in Regional Development (QEIRD) after the measurement of economic quality is obtained by the total factor productivity (TFP). Moreover, the distribution of Chi-square is fitted to classify the grades of QEIRD, and the causes of QEIRD are analyzed via exogenous variables and regional decomposition under the panel data from China at the provincial level. The results indicate that the new method of measuring QEIRD based on TFP is scientific and reasonable in China at the country level. Secondly, the results obtained from the three regional decomposition ways are highly consistent, showing that the QEIRD from China has been diminishing, though not continuously and more so in some periods and regions, and being in a transition from stage three to stage two. Thirdly, the mainspring of total QEIRD is from the between-regions QEIRD; however, the rate of the within-region QEIRD is increasing cannot be neglected. In addition, exogenous variables have a crucial role in reducing QEIRD; it is a long-term and unremitting efforts to achieve stage one and move toward coordinated regional development in China.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 556
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Imbalance measurement of regional economic quality development: evidence from China
    Qiang Liu
    Shengxia Xu
    Xiaoli Lu
    The Annals of Regional Science, 2020, 65 : 527 - 556
  • [2] Quality of life and regional economic development: Evidence from China
    Cui, Yuhu
    Tian, Hu
    An, Dong
    Jia, Yonghua
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [3] Transnational corporations and their impact on regional economic imbalance -: Evidence from China
    Li, XJ
    Yeung, YM
    THIRD WORLD PLANNING REVIEW, 1998, 20 (04): : 351 - 373
  • [4] Culture and regional economic development: Evidence from China
    Shi, Shuxing
    Huang, Kunming
    Ye, Dezhu
    Yu, Linhui
    PAPERS IN REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2014, 93 (02) : 281 - 299
  • [5] Research on the Influence of Economic Development Quality on Regional Employment Quality: Evidence from the Provincial Panel Data in China
    Wang, Qiong
    Shao, Jiahui
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [6] Human capital quality and the regional economic growth: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Yi
    Kumar, Sanjay
    Huang, Xianhai
    Yuan, Yiming
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2023, 86
  • [7] Assessing the Regional Imbalance between Environment and Economic Development within China
    Li, Xin
    Guan, Yang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (EDEP 2018), 2018, 174 : 333 - 342
  • [8] Environmental Regulations, the Industrial Structure, and High-Quality Regional Economic Development: Evidence from China
    Chen, Lingming
    Ye, Wenzhong
    Huo, Congjia
    James, Kieran
    LAND, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 22
  • [9] FDI and Economic Development: Evidence from China's Regional Growth
    Liu, Xiangbo
    Luo, Yu
    Qiu, Zhigang
    Zhang, Ru
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2014, 50 : 87 - 106
  • [10] EFFECT OF GREEN FINANCE ON REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Mao, Qian
    Ma, Xiaoxin
    Shi, Lin
    Xu, Jing
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2021, 20 (3C): : 505 - 525