International Survey of the Usage of Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment Software

被引:2
|
作者
Sartori, Thais [1 ]
Drogemuller, Robin [1 ]
Omrani, Sara [1 ]
Lamari, Fiona [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol QUT, Fac Engn, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
关键词
design; decision-making; life cycle assessment (LCA); whole building life cycle assessment; WBLCA; survey the usage of the software; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/buildings12081278
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The pressure to reduce the environmental impacts of buildings over their lifetime has driven certification bodies and the government to require a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). However, LCA is a data-intensive and time-consuming process which complicates design activities, especially when performing a Whole Building LCA (WBLCA). Software tools can simplify the assessment by providing information more aligned with the users' needs. This research surveyed 178 building designers who utilise WBLCA software as a decision-making tool. The aim was to identify patterns in the usage of the software and provide guidance to WBLCA software developers. For this purpose, statistical analyses identified the software preferences within each group of users, e.g., the users' geographical location, professional background and years of WBLCA experience, among others. The results identified challenges faced by the construction industry, such as the need for more efficient communication among stakeholders. Therefore, attributes that allow designers to share information were rated as the most valuable. Two main groups of users were identified, and guidelines were drawn based on the profiles of the groups. Improving software support to designers will enable WBLCA to be integrated more efficiently with BPP by improving the users' experience and their ability to make more informed decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The international conference on life cycle assessment (InLCA)
    Mary Ann Curran
    Rita Schenck
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2001, 6 (2) : 69 - 69
  • [42] A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment
    Reap, John
    Roman, Felipe
    Duncan, Scott
    Bras, Bert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2008, 13 (05): : 374 - 388
  • [43] A systematic review of BIM usage for life cycle impact assessment
    Crippa, Julianna
    Araujo, Aline M. F.
    Bem, Diogo
    Ugaya, Cassia M. L.
    Scheer, Sergio
    BUILT ENVIRONMENT PROJECT AND ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2020, 10 (04) : 603 - 618
  • [44] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of multistorey building: Attributional and consequential perspectives
    Fauzi, Rizal Taufiq
    Lavoie, Patrick
    Tanguy, Audrey
    Amor, Ben
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 197
  • [45] Construction of life cycle assessment software system platform
    张亚平
    Journal of Chongqing University(English Edition), 2007, (01) : 35 - 40
  • [46] Modular methodology for building life cycle assessment for a building stock model
    Szalay, Zs.
    Kiss, B.
    LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT IN CIVIL ENGINEERING: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED VISION, 2019, : 855 - 861
  • [47] Building Information Management as a Tool for Managing Knowledge throughout whole Building Life Cycle
    Nyvlt, Vladimir
    Novotny, Radimir
    3RD WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE, URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS 2018), 2019, 471
  • [48] Building Information Management as a Tool for Managing Knowledge throughout whole Building Life Cycle
    Nyvlt, Vladimir
    Pruskova, Kristyna
    WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM - WMCAUS, 2017, 245
  • [49] Who Cares About Life Cycle Assessment? A Survey of 900 Prospective Life Cycle Assessment Practitioners
    Masanet, Eric
    Chang, Yuan
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2014, 18 (06) : 787 - 791
  • [50] Functional unit influence on building life cycle assessment
    Hugo Henrique de Simone Souza
    Patrícia Pereira de Abreu Evangelista
    Diego Lima Medeiros
    Jaume Albertí
    Pere Fullana-i-Palmer
    Marc Árpád Boncz
    Asher Kiperstok
    Jardel Pereira Gonçalves
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 435 - 454