International Survey of the Usage of Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment Software

被引:2
|
作者
Sartori, Thais [1 ]
Drogemuller, Robin [1 ]
Omrani, Sara [1 ]
Lamari, Fiona [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol QUT, Fac Engn, Sch Architecture & Built Environm, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
关键词
design; decision-making; life cycle assessment (LCA); whole building life cycle assessment; WBLCA; survey the usage of the software; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/buildings12081278
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The pressure to reduce the environmental impacts of buildings over their lifetime has driven certification bodies and the government to require a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). However, LCA is a data-intensive and time-consuming process which complicates design activities, especially when performing a Whole Building LCA (WBLCA). Software tools can simplify the assessment by providing information more aligned with the users' needs. This research surveyed 178 building designers who utilise WBLCA software as a decision-making tool. The aim was to identify patterns in the usage of the software and provide guidance to WBLCA software developers. For this purpose, statistical analyses identified the software preferences within each group of users, e.g., the users' geographical location, professional background and years of WBLCA experience, among others. The results identified challenges faced by the construction industry, such as the need for more efficient communication among stakeholders. Therefore, attributes that allow designers to share information were rated as the most valuable. Two main groups of users were identified, and guidelines were drawn based on the profiles of the groups. Improving software support to designers will enable WBLCA to be integrated more efficiently with BPP by improving the users' experience and their ability to make more informed decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An integrative Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment (WBLCA) framework: A survey of software developers? perspective
    Sartori, Thais
    Drogemuller, Robin
    Omrani, Sara
    Lamari, Fiona
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 223
  • [2] Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment of a Living Building
    Gardner, Haley M.
    Hasik, Vaclav
    Banawi, Abdulaziz
    Olinzock, Maureen
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 26 (04)
  • [3] A systematic review of consequential life cycle assessment in whole building life cycle assessment
    Udisi, B.
    Gorgolewski, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 7 (02):
  • [5] A taxonomy for Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment (WBLCA)
    Rodriguez, Barbara X.
    Simonen, Kathrina
    Huang, Monica
    De Wolf, Catherine
    SMART AND SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 8 (03) : 190 - 205
  • [6] Uncertainties in whole-building life cycle assessment: A systematic review
    Feng, Haibo
    Zhao, Jianfeng
    Zhang, Haonan
    Zhu, Shiyao
    Li, Dezhi
    Thurairajah, Niraj
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 50
  • [7] Lighting systems integration with whole-building life cycle assessment☆
    Mccord, Kieren
    Bixler, Taler S.
    Johnston, Kasey
    Gupta, Trisha
    Poplawski, Michael
    Hickcox, Kate
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2025, 335
  • [8] Whole-Building Life Cycle Assessment: Comparison of Available Tools
    Herrero-Garcia V.
    Technology Architecture and Design, 2020, 4 (02): : 248 - 252
  • [9] Life Cycle Assessment of a building using Open-LCA software
    Pamu, Yashwanth
    Kumar, V. S. S.
    Shakir, Mohammad Abdul
    Ubbana, Hemanjali
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 52 : 1968 - 1978
  • [10] Comparative whole-building life cycle assessment of renovation and new construction
    Hasik, Vaclav
    Escott, Elizabeth
    Bates, Roderick
    Carlisle, Stephanie
    Faircloth, Billie
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 161