The Japanese Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening

被引:50
|
作者
Hamashima, Chisato [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Ctr Publ Hlth Sci, Div Canc Screening Assessment & Management, Chuo Ku, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
关键词
breast cancer; cancer screening; mammography; clinical breast examination; ultrasonography; meta-analysis; systematic review; guideline; FALSE-POSITIVE RECALL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; RADIATION RISK; DEATH RATES; AGE; 40; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORTALITY; WOMEN; OVERDIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hyw008
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The incidence of breast cancer has progressively increased, making it the leading cause of cancer deaths in Japan. Breast cancer accounts for 20.4% of all new cancers with a reported age-standardized rate of 63.6 per 100 000 women. Methods: The Japanese Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening were developed based on a previously established method. The efficacies of mammography with and without clinical breast examination, clinical breast examination and ultrasonography with and without mammography were evaluated. Based on the balance of the benefits and harms, recommendations for population-based and opportunistic screenings were formulated. Results: Five randomized controlled trials of mammographic screening without clinical breast examination were identified for mortality reduction from breast cancer. The overall relative risk for women aged 40-74 years was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.83). Three randomized controlled trials of mammographic screening with clinical breast examination served as eligible evidence for mortality reduction from breast cancer. The overall relative risk for women aged 40-64 years was 0.87 (95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.98). The major harms of mammographic screening were radiation exposure, false-positive cases and overdiagnosis. Although two case-control studies evaluating mortality reduction from breast cancer were found for clinical breast examination, there was no study assessing the effectiveness of ultrasonography for breast cancer screening. Conclusions: Mammographic screening without clinical breast examination for women aged 40-74 years and with clinical breast examination for women aged 40-64 years is recommended for population-based and opportunistic screenings. Clinical breast examination and ultrasonography are not recommended for population-based screening because of insufficient evidence regarding their effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 492
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Racial Disparities Persist in Cancer Screening: New USPSTF Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Illuminate Inadequate Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Black Women
    Edmonds, Christine E.
    Zuckerman, Samantha P.
    Guerra, Carmen E.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (06) : 1534 - 1536
  • [42] American cancer society guidelines for breast cancer screening: Update 2003
    Smith, RA
    Saslow, D
    Sawyer, KA
    Burke, W
    Costanza, ME
    Evans, WP
    Foster, RS
    Hendrick, E
    Eyre, HJ
    Sener, S
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2003, 53 (03) : 141 - 169
  • [43] Progress Toward Consensus on Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines and Reducing Screening Harms
    Rapelyea, Jocelyn A.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (04) : 561 - 562
  • [44] Progress Toward Consensus on Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines and Reducing Screening Harms
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 175 (12) : 1970 - 1971
  • [45] Corrections: Breast cancer screening guidelines for young women of color
    Gordon, Paula B.
    Berg, Wendie A.
    CANCER, 2022, 128 (04) : 849 - 850
  • [46] Breast cancer in the Bahamas: Revisiting the adequacy of national screening guidelines
    Deleveaux, S.
    Curling, D.
    Francis, W.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [47] An open letter to panels that are deciding guidelines for breast cancer screening
    Daniel B. Kopans
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2015, 151 : 19 - 25
  • [48] Understanding Recommendations From Various Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines
    Cadet, Myriam Jean
    Ajay, Geetha
    Drago, Charles I.
    Stelmark, Jarek
    JNP- THE JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2025, 21 (01):
  • [49] The effect of family history on adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines
    Hibler, Lauren Marie
    Chagpar, Anees B.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (15)
  • [50] The State of Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines: A Question and Answer Summary
    Kopans, Daniel B.
    Biggs, Kelly W.
    Pyatt, Robert S., Jr.
    Smetherman, Dana
    Friedberg, Eric B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (05) : 629 - 632