Aerodynamic study of three cars in tandem using computational fluid dynamics

被引:4
|
作者
Abdul-Rahman, H. [1 ]
Moria, H. [2 ]
Rasani, M. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Dept Mech & Mfg Engn, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Yanbu Ind Coll, Deparlment Mech Engn Technol, Yanbu Al Sinaiyah City 41912, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Computational fluid; dynamics (CFD); platoon; aerodynamic force; drag coefficient; TURBULENT-FLOW; AHMED BODY; VEHICLES; PLATOON;
D O I
10.15282/jmes.15.3.2021.02.0646
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Aerodynamics of vehicles account for nearly 80% of fuel losses on the road. Today, the use of the Intelligent Transport System (ITS) allows vehicles to be guided at a distance close to each other and has been shown to help reduce the drag coefficients of the vehicles involved. In this article, the aim is to investigate the effect of distances between a three car platoons, to their drag and lift coefficients, using computational fluid dynamics. To that end, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation was first performed on a single case and platoon of two Ahmed car models using the STAR-CCM+ software, for validation with previous experimental studies. Significant drop in drag coefficients were observed on platoon models compared to a single model. Comparison between the k-ro and k-E turbulence models for a two car platoon found that the k-ro model more closely approximate the experimental results with errors of only 8.66% compared to 21.14% by k-c turbulence model. Further studies were undertaken to study the effects of various car gaps (0.5L, 1.0L and 1.5L; L = length of the car) to the aerodynamics of a three -car platoon using CFD simulation. Simulation results show that the lowest drag coefficient that impacts on vehicle fuel savings varies depending on the car's position. For the front car, the lowest drag coefficient (CD) can be seen for car gaps corresponding to Xi = 0.5L and X2 = 0.5L, where Co = 0.1217, while its lift coefficient (CO was 0.0366 (X, and X2 denoting first to second and second to third car distance respectively). For the middle car, the lowest drag coefficient occurred when Xi = 1.5L and X2 = 0.5L, which is 0.1397. The lift coefficient for this car was -0.0611. Meanwhile, for the last car, the lowest drag coefficient was observed when Xi = 0.5L and X2 = 1.5L, i.e. Co = 0.263. The lift coefficient for this car was 0.0452. In this study, the lowest drag coefficient yields the lowest lift coefficient. The study also found that for even Xi and X2 spacings, the drag coefficient increased steadily from the front to the last car, while the use of different spacings were found to decrease drag coefficient of the rear car compared to the front car and had a positive impact on platoon driving and fuel -saving.
引用
收藏
页码:8228 / 8240
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of the Effect of Leg Position on Cyclist Aerodynamic Drag
    Griffith, Martin D.
    Crouch, Timothy
    Thompson, Mark C.
    Burton, David
    Sheridan, John
    Brown, Nicholas A. T.
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2014, 136 (10):
  • [22] Effects of Wind on Forward and Turning Flight of Flying Cars Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Magata, Taiga
    Takii, Ayato
    Yamakawa, Masashi
    Kobayashi, Yusei
    Asao, Shinichi
    Takeuchi, Seiichi
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, ICCS 2024, PT I, 2024, 14832 : 3 - 18
  • [23] Study of flow behaviour in a three-product cyclone using computational fluid dynamics
    Mainza, A.
    Narasimha, M.
    Powell, M. S.
    Holtham, P. N.
    Brennan, M.
    MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2006, 19 (10) : 1048 - 1058
  • [24] Aerodynamic Study of Wind Flow through a Lattice Tower of Angular Section Profiles, Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Costa, Andre
    Paiva, Fabio
    Barros, Rui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2014, 7 : 83 - 87
  • [25] Aerodynamic shape optimization using computational fluid dynamics and parallel simulated annealing algorithms
    Wang, X
    Damodaran, M
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2001, 39 (08) : 1500 - 1508
  • [26] Aerodynamic and flutter performance of the bridge deck with various countermeasures using computational fluid dynamics
    Haldar, Puja
    Karmakar, Somnath
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2024,
  • [27] Protuberance Aerodynamic Loads for Space Launch Vehicle Systems Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Applebaum, Michael
    Eppard, Marc
    Hall, Les
    Blevins, John
    JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2012, 49 (05) : 779 - 787
  • [28] Aerodynamic analysis of a high-speed train using computational fluid dynamics technique
    Barhm, Mohamad
    Qasim, Ali Mohammed
    Karlen, Galoyan
    Ingegneria Ferroviaria, 2023, 78 (09): : 615 - 624
  • [29] Aerodynamic Analysis on Postures of Ski Jumpers during Flight using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Ryu, Minhyoung
    Cho, Leesang
    Cho, Jinsoo
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2015, 58 (04) : 204 - 212
  • [30] Unsteady Vibration Aerodynamic Modeling and Evaluation of Dynamic Derivatives Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Liu, Xu
    Liu, Wei
    Zhao, Yunfei
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 2015