New Method for Shear Strength Determination of Unfilled, Unweathered Rock Joint

被引:26
|
作者
Jang, Hyun-Sic [1 ]
Jang, Bo-An [1 ]
机构
[1] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Geophys, Chunchon 200701, Gangwon Do, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Replica joint; Joint roughness; Joint wall strength; Basic friction angle; Shear strength equation; BASIC FRICTION ANGLE; ROUGHNESS; SURFACE; PARAMETER; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1007/s00603-014-0660-3
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Replicas were produced of 20 natural rock joints with different roughness. Factors affecting shear strength were examined and direct shear tests were performed using the replica joints to determine their quantitative shear strength characteristics. Results from the shear tests were best fitted by the power law equation, tau = A sigma(B)(n), where tau is the shear strength and sigma(n) is the normal stress, and regression coefficients A and B were determined. The coefficient A (equal to tau when sigma(n) is 1 MPa) is defined as the friction angle, and B, which determines the curvature of the plot of shear versus normal strength, is a factor that reduces the shear strength. The physical and mechanical properties of the coefficients A and B were defined, and the relationship between these coefficients and the factors affecting shear strength, such as roughness and joint wall strength, were analyzed quantitatively. A new equation, tau = sigma(B)(n)tan[phi(b)+ phi(j)+ s(n)], was suggested to measure and predict shear strength accurately based on results from these analyses, where phi(b) is the basic friction angle, phi(J) is the joint roughness angle, and s(n) is the shear component. Although the new shear strength equation is nonlinear, it is as simple to use as a linear equation and the shear strength can be estimated using only three easily measurable parameters (phi(b), phi(j), and sigma(j), the joint wall compressive strength). The failure envelope estimated using the new shear strength equation not only closely matches the measured shear strength, but also reflects the nonlinear relationship between the normal stress and shear strength.
引用
收藏
页码:1515 / 1534
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experimental shear behavior and shear strength model of inclined rock joint with weak interlayer
    Luo, Zhanyou
    Fu, Xiuxiang
    Du, Shigui
    Liu, Guangjian
    Huang, Man
    Yong, Rui
    Journal of Mining and Strata Control Engineering, 2024, 6 (05)
  • [32] Determining Rock Joint Peak Shear Strength Based on GA-BP Neural Network Method
    Zhu, Chuangwei
    Guo, Baohua
    Zhang, Zhezhe
    Zhong, Pengbo
    Lu, He
    Sigama, Anthony
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (20):
  • [33] DIRECT AND INDIRECT DETERMINATION OF SHEAR STRENGTH OF ROCK MASS.
    Ladanyi, B.
    Archambault, G.
    ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1980,
  • [34] Shear strength research on rock joint surfaces based on multifractal theory
    Chen Shi-jiang
    Zhu Wan-cheng
    Yu Qing-lei
    Wang Qing-yuan
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2015, 36 (03) : 703 - 710
  • [35] Anisotropic shear strength of rock joint caused by irregular shape asperity
    Ozawa, T
    Ohtsuka, S
    Doi, M
    Contribution of Rock Mechanics to the New Century, Vols 1 and 2, 2004, : 999 - 1005
  • [36] An alternative method for in situ determination of rock strength
    Naderi, Mahmood
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 48 (12) : 1901 - 1905
  • [37] New strength criterion for rock with shear failure mode
    Zhou, G.
    Tham, L.G.
    Lee, P.K.K.
    Tsui, Y.
    2001, Academia Sinica (20):
  • [38] New interpretable shear strength criterion for rock joints
    Hadi Fathipour-Azar
    Acta Geotechnica, 2022, 17 : 1327 - 1341
  • [39] NEW DESCRIPTION OF THE SHEAR-STRENGTH FOR ROCK JOINTS
    MAKSIMOVIC, M
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 1992, 25 (04) : 275 - 284
  • [40] Choosing Appropriate Parameters for Developing Empirical Shear Strength Criterion of Rock Joint: Review and New Insights
    Tang, Zhi Cheng
    Jiao, Yu Yong
    Wong, Louis Ngai Yuen
    Wang, Xiao Chuan
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2016, 49 (11) : 4479 - 4490