Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty A prospective cohort study protocol

被引:12
|
作者
Wu, Xiang-Dong [1 ]
Chen, Yu [1 ]
Wang, Zhang-Yu [1 ]
Li, Yu-Jian [1 ]
Zhu, Zheng-Lin [1 ]
Tao, Yu-Zhang [1 ]
Chen, Hong [1 ]
Cheng, Qiang [1 ]
Huang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 1 Youyi Rd, Chongqing 400016, Peoples R China
关键词
bone mineral density; bone remodeling; cementless stem; hip arthroplasty; LCU stem; Ribbed stem; FOLLOW-UP; MECHANICAL-STRESS; MINERAL DENSITY; COMPONENT; REPLACEMENT; DXA; KNEE; POPULATION; FIXATION; REVISION;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000012560
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Current total hip arthroplasty (THA) implant usage trends favor cementless fixation, and plenty studies have demonstrated that numbers of cementless femoral stems are associated with excellent long-term survivorship and functional outcomes. Various types of cementless femoral stems have been developed and utilized in multiple applications, including straight, tapered, anatomic, customized, short, and even neck stems. All of these designs aimed to achieve maximal primary stability and promote osseointegration. Nevertheless, stress-shielding and periprosthetic bone loss continue to occur and remain critical issues in promoting long-term survivorship of THA. Considering anatomic and tapered stems are the most popular cementless designs today, this prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the effect of stem design on stress-shielding and periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of an anatomic stem with proximal fixation (Ribbed Hip system; Waldemar Link, Hamburg, Germany) and the direct comparison to a fully coated tapered stem (LCU Hip system; Waldemar Link). Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study will comprise patients who receive primary unilateral THA with the Ribbed anatomic hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stem or LCU tapered fully HA-coated stem. The changes in periprosthetic bone mineral density after insertion of Ribbed and LCU stem prostheses will be assessed by means of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the periprosthetic region of interest according to Gruen and colleagues. Standard anteroposterior and lateral plain radiography will be performed for qualitative assessment of the periprosthetic bone remodeling. The following items will be analyzed or measured on follow-up radiographs to compare with the initial appearance on the radiographs taken immediately postoperatively: cortical thickness in each Gruen zone, fitness of the distal stem within the isthmus, femoral stem alignment, radiolucent line, reactive line, periosteal bone reactions, and subsidence. Biologic fixation and stability of the cementless implant will be evaluated using Engh grading scale, and heterotopic ossification will be graded according to Brooker classification. Furthermore, Harris hip score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Score will also be assessed for postoperative functional evaluation. These radiologic and clinical assessments will be taken postoperatively, at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after surgery. Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Ethics Committee. The study results will be disseminated at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does Femoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty?
    Bigart, Kevin C.
    Nahhas, Cindy R.
    Ruzich, Gregory P.
    Culvern, Chris N.
    Salzano, Michael B.
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    Nam, Denis
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (06): : S359 - S363
  • [22] A Prospective Study of Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density after Total Hip Arthroplasty by DEXA
    Shen Lin DSabo VEwerbeck Xiehe Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology Wuhan
    中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2001, (03) : 7 - 11
  • [23] A radiographic comparison of femoral offset after cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty
    Berstock, James R.
    Hughes, Adrian M.
    Lindh, Amy M.
    Smith, Evert J.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 24 (06) : 582 - 586
  • [24] Effect of bisphosphonates in preventing femoral periprosthetic bone resorption after primary cementless total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
    Xinyu Zhao
    Dongcai Hu
    Jun Qin
    Rahul Mohanan
    Liaobin Chen
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 10
  • [25] Effect of bisphosphonates in preventing femoral periprosthetic bone resorption after primary cementless total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
    Zhao, Xinyu
    Hu, Dongcai
    Qin, Jun
    Mohanan, Rahul
    Chen, Liaobin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10
  • [26] Periprosthetic bone remodelling after cementless total hip replacement - A prospective comparison of two different implant designs
    Ang, KC
    De, SD
    Goh, JCH
    Low, SL
    Bose, K
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (04): : 675 - 679
  • [27] The Efficacy of Denosumab for Prevention of Early Periprosthetic Bone Loss After Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Shao, Long
    Wu, Xiang-Dong
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2020, 35 (05) : 998 - 999
  • [28] Longitudinal evaluation of time related bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty
    Nishii, T
    Sugano, N
    Masuhara, K
    Shibuya, T
    Ochi, T
    Tamura, S
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1997, (339) : 121 - 131
  • [29] Changes of bone mineral density after cementless total hip arthroplasty with two different stems
    Keiji Sano
    Kouji Ito
    Kengo Yamamoto
    International Orthopaedics, 2008, 32 : 167 - 172
  • [30] Changes of bone mineral density after cementless total hip arthroplasty with two different stems
    Sano, Keiji
    Ito, Kouji
    Yamamoto, Kengo
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2008, 32 (02) : 167 - 172