Assessment of animal welfare in 80 dairy cow herds in cubicle housing - animal health and other animal-related parameters

被引:0
|
作者
Rouha-Muelleder, C. [1 ]
Palme, R. [2 ]
Waiblinger, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vet Med Univ Wien, Inst Tierhaltung & Tierschutz, Dept Nutztiere & Offentliches Gesundheitswesen Ve, Vienna, Austria
[2] Vet Med Univ Wien, Inst Biochem, Dept Biomed Wissensch, Vienna, Austria
来源
WIENER TIERARZTLICHE MONATSSCHRIFT | 2010年 / 97卷 / 9-10期
关键词
cubicle housing; diary cows; health; behaviour; animal welfare; lameness; lesions; SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; CORTISOL METABOLITES; MILK-YIELD; CATTLE; INDICATORS; LAMENESS; SYSTEMS; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; LOCOMOTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Introduction With growing concerns about farm animal welfare (e.g. by consumers; WILDNER, 1998), knowledge about the actual situation with regard to animal welfare on farms is important. Valid assessment of animal of animal welfare requires the use of animal-based parameters, while environmental parameters alone are not sufficient (WINCKLER et al., 2003; MULLEDER et al., 2007). Suitable animal-related measurements comprise behavioural, physiological, health and, at least partly, production parameters (TERLOUW et al., 1997; KNIERIM, 1998). The aim of this study was to assess animal welfare in dairy cows in cubicle loose housing in Austria by using animal-related parameters to identify problem areas and need for improvements. Material and methods 80 dairy herds with herd size of 21 to 55 Simmental cows were visited once on 2 consecutive half days. Animal-related parameters from all parameter groups mentioned above were recorded, i.e. rising up/lying down behaviour, avoidance distance towards humans, social interactions (behaviour), lameness, skin lesions, body condition, somatic cell count in milk (health), adrenocortical activity (physiology), milk yield and cleanliness. Data collection took place in spring 2002 and from October 2002 to March 2003. Associations between animal-related parameters were calculated by means of Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Results Data revealed substantial variation between farms in most parameters and considerable problems regarding animal health and behaviour: prevalence of lameness was 36 % (0 - 77 %) and more than 50 % of the animals had tarsal or carpal lesions. More than 80 % of the animals were restricted in rising up/lying down - behaviour. Lameness was positively associated with the percentage of animals with carpal lesions (r(s)=0.343, p=0.002) and the percentage of animals with tarsal lesions (r(s)=0.486, p<0.001). Furthermore, lameness was correlated weakly with lying down problems (r(s)=0.219, p=0.051). The percentage of animals with crusts on the tarsal joint was associated with the concentration of cortisol metabolites (r(s)=0.322, p=0.004). Conclusion In conclusion, the investigated farms showed considerable problems concerning animal welfare. Although cubicle loose housing systems in principle can fulfill the needs of cows, the results point at a clear need for improvement of animal welfare on farms. This accounts especially for health problems such as lameness and carpal and tarsal lesions as well as restrictions in rising/lying down behaviour, but also social behaviour and human-animal relationships. Successful veterinary herd health management aiming at prevention of disease and increase of animal welfare needs to consider all different areas.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 241
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of Production Technologies on Dairy Farms in Terms of Animal Welfare
    Gaworski, Marek
    Kic, Pavel
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (14):
  • [32] Prevalence of lameness in dairy herds in Lower Saxony - investigations as part of the Animal Welfare Plan
    Klindworth, Hans-Peter
    Schranner, Alexandra
    Ullrich, Antonia
    Kaske, Martin
    BERLINER UND MUNCHENER TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2018, 131 (11-12): : 465 - 472
  • [33] ANIMAL HEALTH AND CLINICAL-PARAMETERS AS EVIDENCE FOR VALUATION OF ANIMAL-WELFARE IN THE POULTRY FLOCKS
    LOLIGER, HC
    VONDEMHAGEN, D
    MATTHES, S
    ARCHIV FUR GEFLUGELKUNDE, 1980, 44 (06): : 229 - 236
  • [34] Assessment of animal welfare in dairy cattle farming - Evaluation of the Welfare Quality® Protocol
    Gieseke, D.
    Lambertz, C.
    Traulsen, Imke
    Krieter, J.
    Gauly, M.
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2014, 86 (01): : 58 - 70
  • [35] Animal-related, non-invasive indicators for determining heat stress in dairy cows
    Hoffmann, Gundula
    Herbut, Piotr
    Pinto, Severino
    Heinicke, Julia
    Kuhla, Bjoern
    Amon, Thomas
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2020, 199 : 83 - 96
  • [36] Symposium review: Considerations for the future of dairy cattle housing: An animal welfare perspective
    Beaver, Annabelle
    Proudfoot, Kathryn L.
    von Keyserling, Marina A. G.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (06) : 5746 - 5758
  • [37] Dairy cow longevity: Impact of animal health and farmers? investment decisions
    Owusu-Sekyere, Enoch
    Nyman, Ann-Kristin
    Lindberg, Mikaela
    Adamie, Birhanu Addisu
    Agenas, Sigrid
    Hansson, Helena
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2023, 106 (05) : 3509 - 3524
  • [38] Animal welfare has priority: Swiss consumers' preferences for animal welfare, greenhouse gas reductions and other sustainability improvements in dairy products
    Richter, Sebastian
    Stolz, Hanna
    Martinez-Cruz, Adan L.
    Kachi, Aya
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2025, 123
  • [39] Voluntary animal welfare assessment of mass-produced farm animal housing equipment using a standardised procedure
    Knierim, U
    Hesse, D
    von Borell, E
    Herrmann, HJ
    Müller, C
    Rauch, HW
    Sachser, N
    Zerbe, F
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2003, 12 (01) : 75 - 84
  • [40] Inter-observer reliability of animal-based welfare indicators included in the Animal Welfare Indicators welfare assessment protocol for dairy goats
    Vieira, A.
    Battini, M.
    Can, E.
    Mattiello, S.
    Stilwell, G.
    ANIMAL, 2018, 12 (09) : 1942 - 1949