Investigating the Sensitivity of Nasal or Throat Swabs: Combination of Both Swabs Increases the Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests

被引:23
|
作者
Goodall, Barbara L. [1 ]
LeBlanc, Jason J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hatchette, Todd F. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Barrett, Lisa [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Patriquin, Glenn [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Med, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Pathol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[3] Nova Scotia Hlth, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Div Microbiol, Halifax, NS, Canada
[4] Dalhousie Univ, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Halifax, NS, Canada
来源
MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM | 2022年 / 10卷 / 04期
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; rapid; antigen; nasal; throat;
D O I
10.1128/spectrum.00217-22
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has been hallmarked by several waves of variants of concern (VoCs), each with novel challenges. Currently, the highly transmissible Omicron VoC is predominant worldwide, and sore throat is common, among other cold-like symptoms. Anecdotes on social media have suggested that sampling one's throat can increase the sensitivity for Omicron detection by antigen-based rapid testing devices (Ag-RDTs). This work aimed to improve the local testing strategy and determine whether the sensitivity of Ag-RDTs designed for nasal sampling is altered with the use of self-administered throat swabs in self-perceived asymptomatic individuals. This investigation used a common Ag-RDT (i.e., Abbott Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test device) to compare three sampling sites: nasal swab, throat swab, and combined nasal/throat. All Ag-RDT results were confirmed with molecular testing from residual test buffer. Compared to reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), samples from nasal or throat swabs each detected 64.5% of SARS-CoV-2 cases; however, combining the contributions of each swab increased the positive percent agreement (PPA) with RT-PCR to 88.7%. This trend was also evident with the Rapid Response Ag-RDT (BTNX), which uses more flexible swabs than does the Panbio. When nasal swab collection was compared to paired sampling of the nose/throat using a single swab with the Panbio Ag-RDT, the PPAs were 68.4% and 81.6%, respectively. No false-positive results were observed with nasal, throat, or combined nasal/throat sampling. Self-administered throat and nasal/throat swabs both had >90% acceptability. These findings support the use of self-collected combined nasal/throat sampling for Ag-RDT-based SARS-CoV-2 detection in self-perceived asymptomatic individuals. IMPORTANCE This quality project demonstrates that combining the results of nasal and throat swabs or using a combined single swab of the throat and nares resulted in increased detection of SARS-CoV-2 using a rapid antigen test, in an asymptomatic population. Importantly, no false positives were detected, and over 90% of people were willing to perform the combination swab. These types of projects are instrumental in informing local practices to improve testing strategies. These data support the option of using a combined nasal/throat swab in our local setting to enhance the detection of Omicron.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CovidArray: A Microarray-Based Assay with High Sensitivity for the Detection of Sars-Cov-2 in Nasopharyngeal Swabs
    Damin, Francesco
    Galbiati, Silvia
    Gagliardi, Stella
    Cereda, Cristina
    Dragoni, Francesca
    Fenizia, Claudio
    Savasi, Valeria
    Sola, Laura
    Chiari, Marcella
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (07)
  • [42] Sensitivity and specificity analysis of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test
    Ito, Hiroshi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 77
  • [43] Rapid Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2
    Bezerra, Matheus Filgueira
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 327 (19): : 1925 - 1926
  • [44] Rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2
    Liu, Michael
    Arora, Rahul K.
    Krajden, Mel
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2021, 193 (13) : E447 - E447
  • [45] Rapid and sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants in nasopharyngeal swabs and wastewaters
    D'Agostino, Ylenia
    Rocco, Teresa
    Ferravante, Carlo
    Porta, Amalia
    Tosco, Alessandra
    Cappa, Valeria Mirici
    Lamberti, Jessica
    Alexandrova, Elena
    Memoli, Domenico
    Terenzi, Ilaria
    Pironti, Concetta
    Motta, Oriana
    Weisz, Alessandro
    Giurato, Giorgio
    Rizzo, Francesca
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2022, 102 (04)
  • [46] Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lee, Rose A.
    Herigon, Joshua C.
    Benedetti, Andrea
    Pollock, Nira R.
    Denkinger, Claudia M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (05)
  • [47] Letter in response to 'Saliva is inferior to nose and throat swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection in children'
    Chu, Stephen
    Hale, Samuel
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2021, 110 (12) : 3387 - 3387
  • [48] Utility of nasal swabs for assessing mucosal immune responses towards SARS-CoV-2
    Ericka Kirkpatrick Roubidoux
    Pamela H. Brigleb
    Kasi Vegesana
    Aisha Souquette
    Kendall Whitt
    Pamela Freiden
    Amanda Green
    Paul G. Thomas
    Maureen A. McGargill
    Joshua Wolf
    Stacey Schultz-Cherry
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [49] Utility of nasal swabs for assessing mucosal immune responses towards SARS-CoV-2
    Roubidoux, Ericka Kirkpatrick
    Brigleb, Pamela H.
    Vegesana, Kasi
    Souquette, Aisha
    Whitt, Kendall
    Freiden, Pamela
    Green, Amanda
    Thomas, Paul G.
    Mcgargill, Maureen A.
    Wolf, Joshua
    Schultz-Cherry, Stacey
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [50] YClinical evaluation of nasopharyngeal, midturbinate nasal and oropharyngeal swabs for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Berenger, Byron M.
    Fonseca, Kevin
    Schneider, Angela R.
    Hu, Jia
    Zelyas, Nathan
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2022, 102 (04)