Collaborative research methods and best practice with children and young people: protocol for a mixed-method review of the health and social sciences literature

被引:3
|
作者
Nowland, Rebecca [1 ]
Robertson, Laura [2 ]
Farrelly, Nicola [3 ]
Roy, Alastair [3 ]
Sharpe, Darren [4 ]
Harris, Cath [5 ]
Morocza, Nora [4 ]
Larkins, Cath [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Lancashire, Sch Community Hlth & Midwifery, Preston, Lancs, England
[2] Poverty Alliance, Res Dept, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Cent Lancashire, Sch Social Work, Preston, Lancs, England
[4] Univ East London, Inst Connected Communities, London, England
[5] Univ Cent Lancashire, Appl Hlth Res Hub, Preston, Lancs, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 10期
关键词
Community child health; Child & adolescent psychiatry; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL MEDICINE; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061659
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Children and young people have the right to participate in research on matters that affect them, and their contribution improves research quality and insights from findings. Discrete participatory approaches are used across different disciplines. This review will provide a synthesis of existing literature from different disciplines by working with young people and adults experienced in participatory research to develop a broad definition of child and youth led research and to identify best practice. Methods and analysis Comprehensive searches will be conducted in eight electronic databases (PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL, Embase, SocINDEX, ASSIA: Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (Proquest), Social Care Online and SCOPUS). Grey literature reports will also be sourced using Google searching. Eligible studies will be English-language primary studies and reviews on collaborative research with children and young people (aged 5-25 years) published from 2000 onwards. Qualitative and quantitative data will be integrated in a single qualitative synthesis following the JBI convergent integrated approach. Study quality will be assessed by developed checklists based on existing participation tools cocreated with the project steering group and co-creation activities with young people. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required as no primary data will be collected. The review will develop guidance on best practice for collaborative research with children and young people, synthesising learnings from a wide variety of disciplines. Dissemination will be via peer-reviewed publications, presentations at academic conferences and lay summaries for various stakeholders. Opportunities for cocreation of outputs will be sought with the young researchers and the project steering committee. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021246378.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs: A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research
    Clark, Vicki L. Plano
    Anderson, Nancy
    Wertz, Jessica A.
    Zhou, Yuchun
    Schumacher, Karen
    Miaskowski, Christine
    JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (04) : 297 - 319
  • [22] THE VALUE OF MIXED-METHOD RESEARCH WITH FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER: A GROUNDED THEORY PROTOCOL
    Ilias, Kartini
    Cornish, Kim
    Park, Miriam Sang-Ah
    Golden, Karen Jennifer
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI-SCIENCES & ENGINEERING, 2015, 77 (33): : 59 - 68
  • [23] Best Practice Principles on Engaging Underserved Communities in Health Research: Review of the Literature
    Park, So
    Mills, Susan
    Cui, Adeline
    Au, Daisy
    Clark, Nancy
    Davis, Connie
    Flores, Guillermina
    Fong, Maylene
    Hamilton, Clayon
    Holms, Shannon
    Koehn, Cheryl
    Koehn, Sharon
    Lacaille, Diane
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 45 (07) : 1023 - 1023
  • [24] Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses
    Johnson, Blair T.
    Hennessy, Emily A.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 233 : 237 - 251
  • [25] Methods for Involving Older People in Health Research-A Review of the Literature
    Schilling, Imke
    Gerhardus, Ansgar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (12)
  • [26] Building a practice-based research network for healthcare integration: a protocol paper for a mixed-method project
    Peters, Sanne
    Chakraborty, Samantha Paubrey
    Barton, Christopher
    Sturgiss, Elizabeth Ann
    Mazza, Danielle
    De Leon-Santiago, Maria
    Staunton-Smith, Timothy
    Russell, Grant
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [27] Health-Related Disaster Communication and Social Media: Mixed-Method Systematic Review
    Eckert, Stine
    Sopory, Pradeep
    Day, Ashleigh
    Wilkins, Lee
    Padgett, Donyale
    Novak, Julie
    Noyes, Jane
    Allen, Tomas
    Alexander, Nyka
    Vanderford, Marsha
    Gamhewage, Gaya
    HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2018, 33 (12) : 1389 - 1400
  • [28] Strategies used to engage children in health research, and the challenges to be faced: a mixed-method study
    Damne, Emma
    Chaplin, John
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 : S92 - S92
  • [29] Co-production of health and social science research with vulnerable children and young people: A rapid review
    Erwin, Jo
    Burns, Lorna
    Devalia, Urshla
    Witton, Robert
    Shawe, Jill
    Wheat, Hannah
    Axford, Nick
    Doughty, Janine
    Kaddour, Sarah
    Nelder, Abigail
    Brocklehurst, Paul
    Boswell, Skye
    Paisi, Martha
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (02)
  • [30] Competence development in collaborative hybrid learning among health sciences students: A quasi-experimental mixed-method study
    Pramila-Savukoski, Sari
    Karna, Raila
    Kuivila, Heli-Maria
    Oikarainen, Ashlee
    Tormanen, Tiina
    Juntunen, Jonna
    Jarvela, Sanna
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2023, 39 (06) : 1919 - 1938