A survey of mastitis pathogens including antimicrobial susceptibility in southeastern Australian dairy herds

被引:25
|
作者
Dyson, R. [1 ]
Charman, N. [2 ]
Hodge, A. [2 ]
Rowe, S. M. [3 ]
Taylor, L. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Dairy Focus, 181 Wharparilla Dr, Echuca, Vic 3564, Australia
[2] Zoetis Australia, 5 Rider Blvd, Rhodes, NSW 2138, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Sci, Sydney Sch Vet Sci, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia
关键词
mastitis; antimicrobial resistance; Streptococcus uberis; Staphylococcus aureus; MODERATE CLINICAL MASTITIS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; BOVINE MASTITIS; STREPTOCOCCUS-UBERIS; SUBCLINICAL MASTITIS; BACTERIAL CULTURE; COWS; COMBINATION; RESISTANCE; MILD;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2021-20955
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objectives for this study were to (1) describe the pathogen profile in quarters from cows with clinical mastitis and in cows with subclinical mastitis in south-eastern Australia; and (2) describe antimicrobial sus-ceptibility among isolated pathogens. As a secondary objective, we aimed to compare antimicrobial resistance prevalence in pathogens isolated from clinical and sub-clinical mastitis samples. A convenience sample of dairy herds (n = 65) from 4 regions in southeastern Australia (Gippsland, Northern Victoria, Tasmania, Western Vic-toria) were invited to submit milk samples from cows with clinical and subclinical mastitis over a 14-mo period (January 2011 to March 2012). Farmers were instructed to collect aseptic quarter milk samples from the first 10 cases of clinical mastitis for each month of the study. In addition, farmers submitted composite milk samples from cows with subclinical mastitis at 1 or 2 sampling occasions during the study period. Aerobic culture and biochemical tests were used to identify isolates. Isolates were classified as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant to a panel of antimicrobial agents based on the zone of growth inhibition around antimicrobial-impregnated disks, with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) classified as nonsusceptibility by combining intermediate and resistant groups into a single category. Generalized linear mixed models were used to compare the preva-lence of AMR between clinical and subclinical mastitis isolates. For clinical mastitis samples (n = 3,044), 472 samples (15.5%) were excluded for contamination. Of the remaining samples (n = 2,572), the most common results were Streptococcus uberis (39.2%), no growth (27.5%), Staphylococcus aureus (10.6%), Escherichia coli (8.4%), and Streptococcus dysgalactiae (6.4%). For subclinical mastitis samples (n = 1,072), 425 (39.6%) were excluded due to contamination. Of the remain-ing samples (n = 647), the most common results were no growth (29.1%), Staph. aureus (29.1%), and Strep. uberis (21.6%). The prevalence of AMR among com-mon isolates was low for the majority of antimicrobial agents. Exploratory analysis found that the probability of Staph. aureus demonstrating resistance to penicillin was 5.16 times higher (95% confidence interval: 1.68, 15.88) in subclinical isolates relative to clinical Staph. aureus isolates. A similar association was observed for amoxicillin with subclinical Staph. aureus isolates be -ing 4.70 times (95% confidence interval: 1.49, 14.75) more likely to be resistant than clinical Staph. aureus isolates. We concluded that the most common bacteria causing clinical mastitis in dairy herds in Australia is likely to be Strep. uberis, whereas Staph. aureus is likely to be the most common cause of subclinical mastitis. Despite decades of antimicrobial use to control these organisms, AMR appears to be uncommon.
引用
收藏
页码:1504 / 1518
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antimicrobial resistance profiles of common mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms
    Saini, V.
    McClure, J. T.
    Leger, D.
    Keefe, G. P.
    Scholl, D. T.
    Morck, D. W.
    Barkema, H. W.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (08) : 4319 - 4332
  • [32] Antimicrobial susceptibility of mastitis pathogens from first lactation and older cows
    Rajala-Schultz, PJ
    Smith, KL
    Hogan, JS
    Love, BC
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 102 (1-2) : 33 - 42
  • [33] Qualitative survey on antibiotic use for mastitis and antibiotic residues in Umbrian dairy herds
    Scoppetta, F.
    Cenci, T.
    Valiani, A.
    Galarini, R.
    Capuccella, M.
    LARGE ANIMAL REVIEW, 2016, 22 (01): : 11 - 18
  • [34] Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of mastitis pathogens isolated from dairy herds transitioning to organic management
    Park, Young Kyung
    Fox, Lawrence K.
    Hancock, Dale D.
    McMahan, Wade
    Park, Yong Ho
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2012, 13 (01) : 103 - 105
  • [35] In Vitro Susceptibility of Mastitis Pathogens Isolated from Clinical Mastitis Cases on Northern German Dairy Farms
    Bolte, Josef
    Zhang, Yanchao
    Wente, Nicole
    Kromker, Volker
    VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2020, 7 (01)
  • [37] Mastitis Therapy and Antimicrobial Susceptibility: a Multispecies Review with a Focus on Antibiotic Treatment of Mastitis in Dairy Cattle
    John Barlow
    Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, 2011, 16 : 383 - 407
  • [38] Antimicrobial resistance profiles of common mastitis pathogens on large Chinese dairy farms
    Song, Xiangbin
    Wang, Yaxin
    Bai, Rina
    Pei, Xiaoyan
    Xu, Hongyan
    Zhu, Kui
    Wu, Congming
    JDS COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 5 (03): : 185 - 189
  • [39] Relationship between antimicrobial drug usage and antimicrobial susceptibility of gram-positive mastitis pathogens
    Pol, M.
    Ruegg, P. L.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 (01) : 262 - 273
  • [40] A SURVEY OF DAIRYMENS ATTITUDES TOWARDS MASTITIS CONTROL AND UPTAKE OF MASTITIS CONTROL MEASURES IN 220 IRISH DAIRY HERDS
    KINSELLA, C
    EGAN, J
    AUSTIN, FH
    IRISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1986, 40 (04) : 58 - 61