Vascular plant species richness and bioindication predict multi-taxon species richness

被引:47
|
作者
Brunbjerg, Ane Kirstine [1 ]
Bruun, Hans Henrik [2 ]
Dalby, Lars [1 ]
Flojgaard, Camilla [1 ]
Froslev, Tobias G. [2 ]
Hoye, Toke T. [1 ]
Goldberg, Irina [1 ,2 ]
Laessoe, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
Hansen, Morten D. D. [4 ]
Brondum, Lars [4 ]
Skipper, Lars [4 ]
Fog, Kare [5 ]
Ejrnaes, Rasmus [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Biosci, Ronde, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Nat Hist Museum Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Nat Hist Museum Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark
[5] Amphi Consult, Odense M, Denmark
来源
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2018年 / 9卷 / 12期
关键词
bryophytes; ecospace; fungi; gastropods; hoverflies; metabarcoding; spiders; surrogacy; ELLENBERG INDICATOR VALUES; BIODIVERSITY INDICATORS; LAND-USE; DIVERSITY; GRASSLAND; VEGETATION; EXPLAINS; FIELD;
D O I
10.1111/2041-210X.13087
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Plants regulate soils and microclimate, provide substrate for heterotrophic taxa, are easy to observe and identify and have a stable taxonomy, which strongly justifies their use as indicators in monitoring and conservation. However, there is no consensus as to whether plants are strong predictors of total multi-taxon species richness. In this study, we investigate if general terrestrial species richness can be predicted by vascular plant richness and bioindication. To answer this question, we collected an extensive dataset on species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes, macrofungi, lichens, plant-galling arthropods, gastropods, spiders, carabid beetles, hoverflies, and genetic richness (operational taxonomic units = OTUs) from environmental DNA metabarcoding. We also constructed a Conservation Index based on threatened red list species. Besides using richness of vascular plants for prediction of other taxonomic groups, we also used plant-derived calibration of the abiotic environment (moisture, soil fertility and light conditions) as well as the degree of anthropogenic impact. Bivariate relationships between plant species richness and other species groups showed no consistent pattern. After taking environmental calibration by bioindication into account, we found a consistent, and for most groups significant, positive effect of plant richness. Plant species richness was also important for richness of fungal OTUs, Malaise OTUs and for the Conservation Index. Our multiple regression analyses revealed (a) a consistently positive effect of plant richness on other taxa, (b) prediction of 12%-55% of variation in other taxa and 48% of variation in the total species richness when bioindication and plant richness were used as predictors. Our results justify that vascular plants are strong indicators of total biodiversity across environmental gradients and broad taxonomic realms and therefore a natural first choice for biodiversity monitoring and conservation planning.
引用
收藏
页码:2372 / 2382
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An approach based on the total-species accumulation curve and higher taxon richness to estimate realistic upper limits in regional species richness
    Bevilacqua, Stanislao
    Ugland, Karl Inne
    Plicanti, Adriana
    Scuderi, Danilo
    Terlizzi, Antonio
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 8 (01): : 405 - 415
  • [32] Multi-scale environmental heterogeneity as a predictor of plant species richness
    Costanza, Jennifer K.
    Moody, Aaron
    Peet, Robert K.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2011, 26 (06) : 851 - 864
  • [33] Species richness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: associations with grassland plant richness and biomass
    Hiiesalu, Inga
    Paertel, Meelis
    Davison, John
    Gerhold, Pille
    Metsis, Madis
    Moora, Mari
    Oepik, Maarja
    Vasar, Martti
    Zobel, Martin
    Wilson, Scott D.
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2014, 203 (01) : 233 - 244
  • [34] Placing local plant species richness in the context of environmental drivers of metacommunity richness
    Stevens, MHH
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2006, 94 (01) : 58 - 65
  • [35] Determinants of plant species richness in an alpine meadow
    Olofsson, J.
    Shams, H.
    JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2007, 95 (05) : 916 - 925
  • [36] Predicting plant species richness in a managed forest
    Skov, F
    Svenning, JC
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 180 (1-3) : 583 - 593
  • [37] SPATIAL SCALE AND PLANT-SPECIES RICHNESS
    WEBB, T
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1988, 3 (02) : 54 - 55
  • [38] Plant species richness records in Ukrainian steppe
    Borovyk, Dariia
    Dembicz, Iwona
    Dengler, Juergen
    Guarino, Riccardo
    Kuzemko, Anna
    Lavrinenko, Kateryna
    Moysiyenko, Ivan
    Skobel, Nadiia
    Bednarska, Iryna
    Babytskiy, Andriy
    Bezsmertna, Olesya
    Borovyk, Larysa
    Buzhdygan, Oksana
    Chusova, Olha
    Iemelianova, Svitlana
    Kalashnik, Kateryna
    Khodosovtsev, Olexander
    Kolomiiets, Ganna
    Kolomiychuk, Vitalii
    Kucher, Oksana
    Shapoval, Viktor
    Zagorodniuk, Natalia
    Zakharova, Maryna
    Vynokurov, Denys
    TUEXENIA, 2024, (44):
  • [39] PLANT-SPECIES RICHNESS IN FARM WOODLANDS
    USHER, MB
    BROWN, AC
    BEDFORD, SE
    FORESTRY, 1992, 65 (01): : 1 - 13
  • [40] Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness
    Adler, Peter B.
    Seabloom, Eric W.
    Borer, Elizabeth T.
    Hillebrand, Helmut
    Hautier, Yann
    Hector, Andy
    Harpole, W. Stanley
    O'Halloran, Lydia R.
    Grace, James B.
    Anderson, T. Michael
    Bakker, Jonathan D.
    Biederman, Lori A.
    Brown, Cynthia S.
    Buckley, Yvonne M.
    Calabrese, Laura B.
    Chu, Cheng-Jin
    Cleland, Elsa E.
    Collins, Scott L.
    Cottingham, Kathryn L.
    Crawley, Michael J.
    Damschen, Ellen I.
    Davies, Kendi F.
    DeCrappeo, Nicole M.
    Fay, Philip A.
    Firn, Jennifer
    Frater, Paul
    Gasarch, Eve I.
    Gruner, Daniel S.
    Hagenah, Nicole
    Lambers, Janneke Hille Ris
    Humphries, Hope
    Jin, Virginia L.
    Kay, Adam D.
    Kirkman, Kevin P.
    Klein, Julia A.
    Knops, Johannes M. H.
    La Pierre, Kimberly J.
    Lambrinos, John G.
    Li, Wei
    MacDougall, Andrew S.
    McCulley, Rebecca L.
    Melbourne, Brett A.
    Mitchell, Charles E.
    Moore, Joslin L.
    Morgan, John W.
    Mortensen, Brent
    Orrock, John L.
    Prober, Suzanne M.
    Pyke, David A.
    Risch, Anita C.
    SCIENCE, 2011, 333 (6050) : 1750 - 1753