Frontomedian activation depends on both feedback validity and valence: fMRI evidence for contextual feedback evaluation

被引:9
|
作者
Volz, KG [1 ]
Schubotz, RI [1 ]
von Cramon, DY [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, D-04303 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
fMRI; feedback; learning;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.026
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Activation within the posterior frontomedian cortex (pFMC) is suggested to be involved in decision conflict, which typically emerges whenever one does not know which action to choose in order to receive a positive outcome. Decision conflict attenuates due to learning which is often indicated by and therefore confounded with the receipt of increasingly frequent positive and decreasingly frequent negative feedback. The present functional Magnetic Resonance study aimed to disentangle the influence of the factors processing of negative feedback and contextual feedback evaluation on pEMC activation. Participants performed a forced choice paradigm in which they had to decide which one out of two competing stimuli would win in a virtual competition game. In one condition (rule learning, RL), participants were provided with valid feedback so that contextual feedback evaluation had a guiding function for action and thus enabled learning. In contrast, participants received no valid information from feedback in another condition (putative learning, PL) and hence could not learn on the basis of contextual feedback evaluation. However, a learning effect in the latter condition was simulated by gradually increasing the frequency of positive feedback and decreasing the frequency of negative feedback according to a learning model which was derived from pilot data. Importantly, participants were naive with respect to feedback manipulations. Beyond confirming pFMC activation for decision conflicts, a significant interaction between validity and valence of feedback in pFMC revealed the specific contribution of contextual feedback evaluation processes on activation of this area. Not the processing of negative feedback per se, which was found to elicit activation within anterior cingulate cortex, but the evaluation of feedback against the background of the current mental model is suggested to be reflected by pFMC activation. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 571
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A New Feedback Control System of Muscle Force Induced by Both Electrical Stimulation and Voluntary Activation
    Hwang, Sun Hee
    Song, Tongjin
    Khang, Gon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRECISION ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING, 2012, 13 (10) : 1903 - 1910
  • [32] Implementation and Initial Construct Validity Evidence of a Tool, myTIPreport, for Interactive Workplace Feedback on ACGME Milestones
    Husk, Katherine E.
    Learman, Lee A.
    Field, Christine
    Connolly, AnnaMarie
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 77 (06) : 1334 - 1340
  • [33] Evidence that calcium feedback and glycolytic oscillations are both important in pancreatic β-cells:: A computational and experimental study
    Bertram, Richard
    Sherman, Arthur
    Nunemaker, Craig S.
    Luciani, Dan S.
    Pedersen, Morten G.
    Zhang, Min
    Tsaneva-Atanasova, Krasimira
    Satin, Leslie S.
    DIABETES, 2006, 55 : A369 - A369
  • [34] Star Formation in the Dwarf Seyfert Galaxy NGC 4395: Evidence for Both AGN and SN Feedback?
    Nandi, Payel
    Stalin, C. S.
    Saikia, D. J.
    Muneer, S.
    Mountrichas, George
    Wylezalek, Dominika
    Sagar, R.
    Kissler-Patig, Markus
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 950 (02):
  • [35] Detection of Cerebral Reorganization Induced by Real-Time fMRI Feedback Training of Insula Activation: A Multivariate Investigation
    Lee, Sangkyun
    Ruiz, Sergio
    Caria, Andrea
    Veit, Ralf
    Birbaumer, Niels
    Sitaram, Ranganatha
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2011, 25 (03) : 259 - 267
  • [36] Real-time fMRI feedback impacts brain activation, results in auditory hallucinations reduction: Part 1: Superior temporal gyrus -Preliminary evidence-
    Okano, Kana
    Bauer, Clemens C. C.
    Ghosh, Satrajit S.
    Lee, Yoon Ji
    Melero, Helena
    de los Angeles, Carlo
    Nestor, Paul G.
    del Re, Elisabetta C.
    Northoff, Georg
    Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan
    Niznikiewicz, Margaret A.
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2020, 286
  • [37] STIMULUS FREQUENCY AND OUTCOME VALENCE MODULATE REWARD-POSITIVITY DURING REWARD AND PUNISHMENT FEEDBACK EVALUATION
    Glazer, James
    Nusslock, Robin
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 57 : S49 - S49
  • [38] A Tentative Study of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE): A Diachronic Research on the Validity of AWE's Feedback
    Fei, Wang
    Chen, Chenghui
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH NORTHEAST ASIA INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LANGUAGE, LITERATURE AND TRANSLATION, 2016, : 625 - 632
  • [39] Investigating the Validity and Reliability of a Comprehensive Essay Evaluation Model of Integrating Manual Feedback and Intelligent Assistance
    Zhao J.
    Li Y.
    Feng W.
    International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 2023, 18 (04) : 248 - 261
  • [40] Morality or competence is more important? The effect of evaluation dimensions on ERP responses to neutral faces depends on contextual valence and self-relevance
    Huang, Xiaoyang
    Sun, Yuliu
    Tao, Ruiwen
    Yan, Kaikai
    Zhang, Entao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 200