Frontomedian activation depends on both feedback validity and valence: fMRI evidence for contextual feedback evaluation

被引:9
|
作者
Volz, KG [1 ]
Schubotz, RI [1 ]
von Cramon, DY [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Human Cognit & Brain Sci, D-04303 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
fMRI; feedback; learning;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.026
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Activation within the posterior frontomedian cortex (pFMC) is suggested to be involved in decision conflict, which typically emerges whenever one does not know which action to choose in order to receive a positive outcome. Decision conflict attenuates due to learning which is often indicated by and therefore confounded with the receipt of increasingly frequent positive and decreasingly frequent negative feedback. The present functional Magnetic Resonance study aimed to disentangle the influence of the factors processing of negative feedback and contextual feedback evaluation on pEMC activation. Participants performed a forced choice paradigm in which they had to decide which one out of two competing stimuli would win in a virtual competition game. In one condition (rule learning, RL), participants were provided with valid feedback so that contextual feedback evaluation had a guiding function for action and thus enabled learning. In contrast, participants received no valid information from feedback in another condition (putative learning, PL) and hence could not learn on the basis of contextual feedback evaluation. However, a learning effect in the latter condition was simulated by gradually increasing the frequency of positive feedback and decreasing the frequency of negative feedback according to a learning model which was derived from pilot data. Importantly, participants were naive with respect to feedback manipulations. Beyond confirming pFMC activation for decision conflicts, a significant interaction between validity and valence of feedback in pFMC revealed the specific contribution of contextual feedback evaluation processes on activation of this area. Not the processing of negative feedback per se, which was found to elicit activation within anterior cingulate cortex, but the evaluation of feedback against the background of the current mental model is suggested to be reflected by pFMC activation. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 571
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contextual valence influences the neural dynamics of time and magnitude representation during feedback evaluation
    Zheng, Ya
    Shi, Puyu
    Deng, Leyou
    Jiang, Huiping
    Zhou, Shiyu
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 60 (10)
  • [2] EFFECTS OF PERCEIVED AGENCY AND CONTEXTUAL VALENCE IN A DELAYED FEEDBACK TASK
    Padiak, Alliya
    Valle-Inclan, Fernando
    Hirao, Takahiro
    Masaki, Hiroaki
    Hackley, Steven
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 59 : S60 - S60
  • [3] The effect of feedback valence and source on perception and metacognition: An fMRI investigation
    Zacharopoulos, George
    Hertz, Uri
    Kanai, Ryota
    Bahrami, Bahador
    COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 13 (01) : 38 - 46
  • [4] Trainees' Perceptions of Feedback: Validity Evidence for Two FEEDME (Feedback in Medical Education) Instruments
    Bing-You, Robert
    Ramesh, Saradha
    Hayes, Victoria
    Varaklis, Kalli
    Ward, Denham
    Blanco, Maria
    TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2018, 30 (02) : 162 - 172
  • [5] An fMRI Study Investigating Adolescent Brain Activation by Rewards and Feedback
    Choi, Won-Hee
    Son, Jung-Woo
    Kim, Yeoung-Rang
    Oh, Jong-Hyun
    Lee, Sang-Ick
    Shin, Chul-Jin
    Kim, Sie-Kyeong
    Ju, Gawon
    Lee, Seungbok
    Jo, Seongwoo
    Ha, Tae Hyon
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 10 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [6] Response process validity evidence of an immediate feedback assessment
    Trate, Jaclyn
    Srinivasan, Shalini
    Thomas, Tessy
    Luxford, Cynthia
    Teichert, Melonie
    Schneider, Jamie
    Murphy, Kristen
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 255
  • [7] Validity evidence and reliability of a simulated patient feedback instrument
    Claudia Schlegel
    Ulrich Woermann
    Jan-Joost Rethans
    Cees van der Vleuten
    BMC Medical Education, 12
  • [8] Validity evidence and reliability of a simulated patient feedback instrument
    Schlegel, Claudia
    Woermann, Ulrich
    Rethans, Jan-Joost
    van der Vleuten, Cees
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 12
  • [9] THE EFFECT OF FEEDBACK STIMULI ON CONTEXTUAL FEAR DEPENDS UPON THE LENGTH OF THE MINIMUM INTERTRIAL INTERVAL
    ROSELLINI, RA
    DECOLA, JP
    WARREN, DA
    LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1986, 17 (03) : 229 - 242
  • [10] FEEDBACK PROCESSING IN A TIME-ESTIMATION TASK: AN FMRI STUDY ON TASK VALIDITY
    Mies, Gabry W.
    van der Veen, Frederik M.
    Smits, Marion
    Hengeveld, Michiel W.
    van der Molen, Maurits W.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 46 : S149 - S150