Exploring Interpretable Predictive Models for Business Processes

被引:22
|
作者
Sindhgatta, Renuka [1 ]
Moreira, Catarina [1 ]
Ouyang, Chun [1 ]
Barros, Alistair [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Australia
来源
关键词
Interpretable models; Attention-based neural networks; Predictive process models;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-58666-9_15
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
There has been a growing interest in the literature on the application of deep learning models for predicting business process behaviour, such as the next event in a case, the time for completion of an event, and the remaining execution trace of a case. Although these models provide high levels of accuracy, their sophisticated internal representations provide little or no understanding about the reason for a particular prediction, resulting in them being used as black-boxes. Consequently, an interpretable model is necessary to enable transparency and empower users to evaluate when and how much they can rely on the models. This paper explores an interpretable and accurate attention-based Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) model for predicting business process behaviour. The interpretable model provides insights into the model inputs influencing a prediction, thus facilitating transparency. An experimental evaluation shows that the proposed model capable of supporting interpretability also provides accurate predictions when compared to existing LSTM models for predicting process behaviour. The evaluation further shows that attention mechanisms in LSTM provide a sound approach to generate meaningful interpretations across different tasks in predictive process analytics.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 272
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Interpretable Predictive Models to Understand Risk Factors for Maternal and Fetal Outcomes
    Tomas M. Bosschieter
    Zifei Xu
    Hui Lan
    Benjamin J. Lengerich
    Harsha Nori
    Ian Painter
    Vivienne Souter
    Rich Caruana
    Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 2024, 8 : 65 - 87
  • [32] Predictive associative models of processes and situations
    Bakhtadze, N.
    Chereshko, A.
    Elpashev, D.
    Suleykin, A.
    Purtov, A.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (02): : 19 - 24
  • [33] Predictive models for primary caregivers: Risky business?
    Miller, RA
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 127 (07) : 565 - 567
  • [34] Predictive Study of Changes in Business Process Models
    Ahmad, Adeel
    Bouneffa, Mourad
    Basson, Henri
    Cherif, Chahira
    Abdi, Mustapha Kamel
    Maiza, Mohammed
    ENTERPRISE INTEROPERABILITY X, EI 2022, 2024, 11 : 49 - 59
  • [35] Predictive models of going concerns and business failure
    Hammond, Paul
    Opoku, Mustapha Osman
    Kwakwa, Paul Adjei
    Amissah, Edmond
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (02):
  • [36] Text-Aware Predictive Monitoring of Business Processes
    Pegoraro, Marco
    Uysal, Merih Seran
    Georgi, David Benedikt
    van der Aalst, Wil M. P.
    24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS (BIS): ENTERPRISE KNOWLEDGE AND DATA SPACES, 2021, : 221 - 232
  • [37] Methods that bridge business models and business processes: a synthesis of the literature
    Machado, Paola Lara
    van de Ven, Montijn
    Aysolmaz, Banu
    Athanasopoulou, Alexia
    Ozkan, Baris
    Turetken, Oktay
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 29 (08) : 48 - 74
  • [38] PRISM - A Predictive Risk Monitoring Approach for Business Processes
    Conforti, Raffaele
    Fink, Sven
    Manderscheid, Jonas
    Roeglinger, Maximilian
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT, BPM 2016, 2016, 9850 : 383 - 400
  • [39] Exploring Business Models for MOOCs in Higher Education
    Burd, Elizabeth L.
    Smith, Shamus P.
    Reisman, Sorel
    INNOVATIVE HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 40 (01) : 37 - 49
  • [40] Matching service strategies, business models and modular business processes
    Bask, Anu H.
    Tinnila, Markku
    Rajahonka, Mervi
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (01) : 153 - 180