Methods for managing different perspectives of project success

被引:67
|
作者
Bryde, DJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Fac Business & Law, Sch Management, Liverpool L3 5UZ, Merseyside, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00438.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The results of an exploratory study of UK organizations into methods for meeting project key performance indicators (KPIs) are presented. The paper explores: influences on the use of methods to manage project KPIs; the need for and existence of methods; the factors that facilitate the meeting of the KPIs. It is concluded that the use of methods varies depending upon the perceived importance of the project, the type of project, the client-team relationship and whether an organization performance management system exists. With project management capability often decreasing, in part due to a failure to meet psychosocial project KPIs, a need for methods linked to the KPIs was identified. However, the study found relatively low levels of adoption of such methods. Where psychosocial project KPIs were being met the following facilitating factors emerged: top-level policies, organization-wide training, integration with existing management processes, building into project management system. Situations were found where decision-makers did not consider the psychosocial KPIs of programme and project managers. This was seen to contribute to a failure by organizations to manage necessary increases in their project management capability and to be acting as a possible barrier to long-term, sustainable improvements in performance.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 131
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coming to terms with project success: Current perspectives and future challenges
    Pinto J.K.
    Davis K.
    Ika L.A.
    Jugdev K.
    Zwikael O.
    International Journal of Project Management, 2022, 40 (07) : 831 - 834
  • [22] Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts
    Joslin, Robert
    Muller, Ralf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (06) : 1377 - 1392
  • [23] An exploratory study of project success with tools, software and methods
    Jugdev, Kam
    Perkins, David
    Fortune, Joyce
    White, Diana
    Walker, Derek
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2013, 6 (03) : 534 - 551
  • [24] Managing diagrammatic models with different perspectives on product information
    Haug, Anders
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2010, 21 (06) : 811 - 822
  • [25] Managing diagrammatic models with different perspectives on product information
    Anders Haug
    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2010, 21 : 811 - 822
  • [26] Different Views on Project Success When Communication Is Not the Same
    Kluender, Jil
    Karras, Oliver
    Kortum, Fabian
    Casselt, Mathias
    Schneider, Kurt
    PRODUCT-FOCUSED SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT (PROFES 2017), 2017, 10611 : 497 - 507
  • [27] Project success criteria and project success by type of project
    Turner, J. Rodney
    Mueller, Ralf
    PROCEEDINGS OF 20TH IPMA WORLD CONGRESS ON PROJECT MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 828 - 835
  • [28] Managing project success using project risk and green supply chain management A survey of automotive industry
    Fernando, Yudi
    Walters, Tim
    Ismail, Mohamad Norris
    Seo, Yong Won
    Kaimasu, Masatoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2018, 11 (02) : 332 - 365
  • [29] Managing success criteria and success factors in a BPM project: an approach using PRINCE2 and Success Management on the public sector
    Takagi, Nilton
    Varajao, Joao
    Ventura, Thiago
    Ubialli, Darclea
    Silva, Thais
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [30] Managing for success
    不详
    FORTUNE, 2003, 148 (08) : 124 - +