The German version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for critically ill adults A prospective validation study

被引:5
|
作者
Kiesewetter, I. [1 ]
Bartels, U. [2 ,3 ]
Bauer, A. [1 ,4 ]
Schneider, G. [2 ,5 ]
Pilge, S. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Anaesthesiol, Munich, Germany
[2] Witten Herdecke Univ, Helios Clin Wuppertal, Dept Anaesthesiol, Wuppertal, Germany
[3] Westkustenkliniken Brunsbuttel & Heide GmbH, Clin Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Heide Holstein, Germany
[4] RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Inst Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Rosenheim, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Munich, Germany
来源
ANAESTHESIST | 2019年 / 68卷 / 12期
关键词
Pain score; Pain measurement; Behavioral rating scale; Intensive care unit; Validation study; CPOT; SCALE; UNIT; TRANSLATION; ADAPTATION; BPS;
D O I
10.1007/s00101-019-00694-5
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The implementation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation tool (CPOT) in intensive care units (ICU) has been associated with more frequent pain assessments, a reduced number of complications, and improved administration of analgesics and sedatives. So far no German translation exists. Translating this tool into foreign languages requires further validation testing. Objective. The aim of this prospective observational validation study was to translate the original version of the CPOT according to scientific principles for translation and to establish the validity and reliability of the German translation of CPOT for critically ill adult patients. Material andmethods. A total of 292 cardiac surgery patients from 2 ICUs of 2 German university teaching hospitals were included (114 patients at center 1 and 178 patients at center 2). Of the included patients 22.6% were female and 76.4% were male with a mean age of 68.5 years +/- 9.3 SD. Pain was evaluated with the CPOT, the Bhavioral Pain Scale (BPS) and with the Numeric Rating scale (NRS) at three time points (1. intubated+ sedated, 2. intubated+ awake, 3. extubated+ awake) at rest and during nociceptive stimulus (positioning). Assessments were made separately by trained physicians and nursing staff. Results. Good results for interrater reliability and internal consistency could be demonstrated (weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.73, Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.8). Spearman correlation between CPOT and NRS was moderate but significant. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to obtain optimal thresholds of CPOT to detect pain revealed different results during rest and stimulus and in intubated and extubated patients. Conclusion. The validated German CPOT translation is a reliable tool for pain assessment in cardiac ICU patients in the absence of patients' ability for self-reporting. The use of this German version of CPOT now allows a better international comparability of corresponding data in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 842
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool-Neuro in brain-injured adults in the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study
    Gelinas, Celine
    Berube, Melanie
    Puntillo, Kathleen A.
    Boitor, Madalina
    Richard-Lalonde, Melissa
    Bernard, Francis
    Williams, Virginie
    Joffe, Aaron M.
    Steiner, Craig
    Marsh, Rebekah
    Rose, Louise
    Dale, Craig M.
    Tsoller, Darina M.
    Choiniere, Manon
    Streiner, David L.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 25 (01)
  • [22] Pain measurement in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: Behavioral Pain Scale versus Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool
    Rijkenberg, S.
    Stilma, W.
    Endeman, H.
    Bosman, R. J.
    Oudemans-van Straaten, H. M.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 30 (01) : 167 - 172
  • [23] Validation Testing of the European Portuguese Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool
    Marques, Rita
    Araujo, Filipa
    Fernandes, Marisa
    Freitas, Jose
    Dixe, Maria Anjos
    Gelinas, Celine
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [24] A Turkish Version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool: Reliability and Validity Assessment
    Aktas, Yesim Yaman
    Karabulut, Neziha
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2017, 32 (04) : 341 - 351
  • [25] Validation of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool in Critically III Patients With Delirium: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Kanji, Salmaan
    MacPhee, Heather
    Singh, Avinder
    Johanson, Christel
    Fairbairn, Jennifer
    Lloyd, Tammy
    MacLean, Robert
    Rosenberg, Erin
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (05) : 943 - 947
  • [26] Validation of the Danish version of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool
    Frandsen, J. B.
    Poulsen, K. S. O'Reilly
    Laerkner, E.
    Stroem, T.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 60 (09) : 1314 - 1322
  • [27] A PRELIMINARY PSYCHOMETRIC TESTING OF THE CRITICAL-CARE PAIN OBSERVATION TOOL IN CHINESE ADULTS
    Jie, Chen
    Lu, Qian
    Zhang, Hai Yan
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (12)
  • [28] Comparison between Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool and physiologic indicators for pain assessment in the critically ill, mechanically ventilated adult patients
    Khanna, Puneet
    Pandey, Ravinder Kumar
    Chandralekha, Chandralekha
    Sharma, Ankur
    Pangasa, Neha
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 12 (03) : 384 - 388
  • [29] REEVALUATION OF THE CRITICAL-CARE PAIN OBSERVATION TOOL IN INTUBATED ADULTS AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY
    Linde, Sandra M.
    Badger, James M.
    Machan, Jason T.
    Beaudry, Jennifer
    Brucker, Amy
    Martin, Kristen
    Opaluch-Bushy, Nancy B.
    Roy, Ruth D. Navedo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 22 (06) : 491 - 497
  • [30] The validation of C-POT (Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool) scale: a tool for assessing pain in intensive care patients
    Stefani, Francesca
    Nardon, Giuseppe
    Bonato, Raffaele
    Modenese, Anna
    Novello, Chiara
    Ferrari, Renata
    ASSISTENZA INFERMIERISTICA E RICERCA, 2011, 30 (03) : 135 - 143