Preferences of the Public for Sharing Health Data: Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:13
|
作者
Johansson, Jennifer Viberg [1 ]
Bentzen, Heidi Beate [2 ]
Shah, Nisha [3 ]
Haraldsdottir, Eik [4 ]
Jonsdottir, Guobjorg Andrea [4 ]
Kaye, Jane [3 ,5 ]
Mascalzoni, Deborah [1 ,6 ]
Veldwijk, Jorien [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Res Eth & Bioeth, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Box 564, SE-75122 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Oslo, Norwegian Res Ctr Comp & Law, Fac Law, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Hlth Law & Emerging Technol, Fac Law, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Iceland, Social Sci Res Inst, Reykjavik, Iceland
[5] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Law & Emerging Technol, Melbourne Law Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Inst Biomed, Bolzano, Italy
[7] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
preferences; discrete choice experiment; health data; secondary use; willingness to share; LATENT CLASS MODEL; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; PRIVACY; CARE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.2196/29614
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Digital technological development in the last 20 years has led to significant growth in digital collection, use, and sharing of health data. To maintain public trust in the digital society and to enable acceptable policy-making in the future, it is important to investigate people's preferences for sharing digital health data. Objective: The aim of this study is to elicit the preferences of the public in different Northern European countries (the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, and Sweden) for sharing health information in different contexts. Methods: Respondents in this discrete choice experiment completed several choice tasks, in which they were asked if data sharing in the described hypothetical situation was acceptable to them. Latent class logistic regression models were used to determine attribute-level estimates and heterogeneity in preferences. We calculated the relative importance of the attributes and the predicted acceptability for different contexts in which the data were shared from the estimates. Results: In the final analysis, we used 37.83% (1967/5199) questionnaires. All attributes influenced the respondents' willingness to share health information (P<.001). The most important attribute was whether the respondents were informed about their data being shared. The possibility of opting out from sharing data was preferred over the opportunity to consent (opt-in). Four classes were identified in the latent class model, and the average probabilities of belonging were 27% for class 1, 32% for class 2, 23% for class 3, and 18% for class 4. The uptake probability varied between 14% and 85%, depending on the least to most preferred combination of levels. Conclusions: Respondents from different countries have different preferences for sharing their health data regarding the value of a review process and the reason for their new use. Offering respondents information about the use of their data and the possibility to opt out is the most preferred governance mechanism.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Public Preferences in Organ Allocation: A Discrete Choice Experiment Regarding Distributive Justice
    Oedingen, Carina
    Bartling, Tim
    Schrem, Harald
    Muehlbacher, Axel C.
    Krauth, Christian
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (06): : 733 - 733
  • [42] Public preferences for safe consumption sites for opioid use: A discrete choice experiment
    Berrigan, Patrick
    Zucchelli, Eugenio
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2022, 238
  • [43] Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Anna Nicolet
    Clémence Perraudin
    Joël Wagner
    Ingrid Gilles
    Nicolas Krucien
    Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux
    Joachim Marti
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2022, 15 : 485 - 496
  • [44] Enhancing Public Participation in Public Health Offerings: Patient Preferences for Facilities in the Western Cape Province Using a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Chiwire, Plaxcedes
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    Evers, Silvia M.
    Mahomed, Hassan
    Hiligsmann, Mickael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [45] Consumers' preferences for endoscopes: a discrete choice experiment
    Chuah, Teik-Leong
    Hong, Meenchee
    Foroughi, Behzad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND HEALTHCARE MARKETING, 2024, 18 (01) : 122 - 147
  • [46] Preferences for work arrangements: A discrete choice experiment
    Valet, Peter
    Sauer, Carsten
    Tolsma, Jochem
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [47] Preferences for access to the GP: a discrete choice experiment
    Rubin, Greg
    Bate, Angela
    George, Ajay
    Shackley, Phil
    Hall, Nicola
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2006, 56 (531): : 743 - 748
  • [48] Preferences for health-care facilities in urban China: a discrete choice experiment
    Liu, Yun
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Kong, Qingxia
    Wang, Shan
    Zhong, Liwei
    van de Klundert, Joris
    LANCET, 2018, 392 : 34 - 34
  • [49] Using discrete choice experiment modelling to assess preferences for health care characteristics
    Taylor, M. J.
    Cisse, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A458 - A458
  • [50] IDENTIFYING THE PUBLIC'S PREFERENCES FOR SHARING HEALTH DATA DIGITALLY
    Johansson, Viberg J.
    Mascalzoni, D.
    Kaye, J.
    Shah, N.
    Jonsdottir, G. A.
    Haraldsdottir, E.
    Veldwijk, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S681 - S681