Does Tax Incentives Affect Future Firm Value for Corporate Sustainability?

被引:2
|
作者
Na, Hyung-Jong [1 ]
Kang, Hyeon [2 ]
Lee, Hyang-Eun [3 ]
机构
[1] Semyung Univ, Dept Accounting & Taxat, Jecheon 27136, South Korea
[2] Kyunggi Univ, Dept Secur Management, Seoul 03731, South Korea
[3] Sungshin Womens Univ, Dept Serv & Design Engn, Seoul 01133, South Korea
关键词
tax benefits; current corporate performance; future firm value; sustainability; inherent taxation; CAPITAL STRUCTURE; GOVERNANCE; BOARDS; SIZE;
D O I
10.3390/su132212665
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates how tax benefits for companies affect future firm value and current corporate performance. In addition, this paper also examines the relationship between tax benefits and future firm value for each major industry. The findings of this paper are as follows. First, tax benefits granted to companies improve current corporate performance. The effect of tax benefits that reduce corporate tax costs increases net income, which directly increases current corporate performance, such as ROA (returns on assets) and ROE (returns on equity). Second, tax benefits granted to firms reduce future firm value. Industries that receive tax benefits may have inherent taxation, which can lead to fiercer competition and ultimately lower pre-tax profit margins due to the entry of new companies or the increase in production facilities. In addition, tax benefits that cause temporary differences among the types of tax benefits for a company through deferred tax payments may be factors that hinder future improvements in corporate value. These causes result in the fact that tax benefits for a company can negatively affect its value in the long term. This paper has the following contributions. First, the findings of this paper imply that there is a limit to the positive impact of tax benefits on firms on improving corporate value in the long run. Second, through empirical analysis, this study provides objective information that the impact of tax incentives on corporate value may differ by industry.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Does Firm-Specific Investor Sentiment Affect the Value of Corporate Cash Holdings?
    Guo, Haifeng
    Yin, Chao
    Zeng, Yeqin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2023, 34 (01) : 410 - 441
  • [22] Corporate tax avoidance and firm value: Evidence from Taiwan
    Nebie, Messaoude
    Cheng, Ming-Chang
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (03):
  • [23] Corporate Social Responsibility, Tax Aggressiveness, and Firm Market Value
    Zeng, Tao
    ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 15 (01) : 7 - 30
  • [24] TAX AGGRESSIVENESS AND FIRM VALUE: IS THE COMPOSITION OF CORPORATE BOARD DECISIVE?
    Vacca, Andrea
    Iazzi, Antonio
    Maizza, Amedeo
    13TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE EUROMED ACADEMY OF BUSINESS: BUSINESS THEORY AND PRACTICE ACROSS INDUSTRIES AND MARKETS, 2020, : 1178 - 1185
  • [25] How do firm characteristics affect the corporate income tax revenue?
    Menichini, Amilcar A.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 65 : 146 - 162
  • [26] Coopetition for corporate responsibility and sustainability: does it influence firm performance?
    Bouncken, Ricarda
    Kumar, Amit
    Connell, Julia
    Bhattacharyya, Asit
    He, Kai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOR & RESEARCH, 2024, 30 (01): : 128 - 154
  • [27] ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard: Sustainability Reporting and Firm Value
    Husnaini, Wahidatul
    Basuki, Basuki
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2020, 7 (11): : 315 - 326
  • [28] Corporate Sustainability Performance and Firm Value through Investment Efficiency
    Alsayegh, Maha Faisal
    Rahman, Rashidah Abdul
    Homayoun, Saeid
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [29] How does corporate social responsibility affect firm leverage?
    Ho, Kung-Cheng
    Wang, Qian
    Sun, Xianming
    Wang, Leonard F. S.
    KYBERNETES, 2022, 51 (10) : 2902 - 2926
  • [30] Does firm competitiveness affect corporate risk-taking?
    Chang, Vincent Y. L.
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2023, 49 (07) : 1097 - 1112