Efficacy of Desloratadine and Levocetirizine in Patients with Cedar Pollen-Induced Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study

被引:12
|
作者
Yonekura, Syuji [1 ]
Okamoto, Yoshitaka [1 ,2 ]
Sakurai, Daiju [1 ]
Iinuma, Tomohisa [1 ]
Sakurai, Toshioki [1 ,3 ]
Yoneda, Riyo [1 ]
Kurita, Junya [1 ]
Hanazawa, Toyoyuki [1 ]
Kawasaki, Yohei [4 ]
机构
[1] Chiba Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Chiba, Japan
[2] Chiba Rosai Hosp, Chiba, Japan
[3] Chiba Canc Ctr, Chiba, Japan
[4] Chiba Univ Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Biostat Sect, Chiba, Japan
关键词
Desloratadine; Levocetirizine; Japanese cedar pollen; Allergic rhinitis; Environmental challenge chamber; Randomized; Placebo controlled; Crossover; Double-blind study; HISTAMINE-INDUCED WHEAL; CHRONIC SPONTANEOUS URTICARIA; NONSEDATING H1-ANTIHISTAMINES; PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT; FLARE RESPONSE; ANTIHISTAMINE; CHALLENGE; SYMPTOMS; THERAPY; PHARMACOGENETICS;
D O I
10.1159/000503065
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: No comparative study of antihistamines that differ in structural system has been conducted in allergic rhinitis. Objective: This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover comparative study to verify the efficacy of antihistamines that differ in structural system. Methods: A total of 50 patients with moderate or more severe Japanese cedar pollen-induced allergic rhinitis were randomized to receive either placebo, desloratadine 5 mg (a tricyclic), or levocetirizine 5 mg (a piperazine). One dose of the study drug was orally administered at 9 pm on the day before a pollen exposure test, which was performed for 3 h (9 a.m. to 12 p.m.) to assess symptoms in an environmental challenge chamber (ECC). Nasal and ocular symptoms were compared at an airborne pollen level of 8,000 grains/m(3). The primary endpoint was mean total nasal symptom score (TNSS) from 120 to 180 min in the ECC. Subjects with a difference of >= 1 in TNSS between 2 drugs were extracted to the relevant drug-responsive group. Results: The difference in TNSS from placebo was -2.42 (p < 0.0001) with levocetirizine and -1.66 (p < 0.01) with desloratadine, showing that both drugs were significantly more effective than placebo in controlling symptoms, but with no statistically significant difference between the 2 drugs. There were 12 subjects in the desloratadine-responsive group and 24 subjects in the levocetirizine-responsive group, with no contributor to response was detected. Conclusion: Levocetirizine tended to control nasal symptoms more effectively than desloratadine. However, the response to each antihistamine varied among individuals and the predictors to the response are unknown.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 283
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of Sublingual Swallow Immunotherapy in Children with Rye Grass Pollen Allergic Rhinitis: A Double-blind Placebo-Controlled Study
    Ahmadiafshar, Akefeh
    Maarefvand, Mina
    Taymourzade, Babak
    Mazloomzadeh, Saeedeh
    Torabi, Zohreh
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ALLERGY ASTHMA AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 11 (02) : 175 - 181
  • [42] The effect of Theophylline in patients with allergic rhinitis: A double-blind, randomised, crossover study
    Sankaran, Prasanna
    Brockwell, Claire
    Wilson, Andrew
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 44
  • [43] Grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study in elderly patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Bozek, Andrzej
    Kolodziejczyk, Krzysztof
    Warkocka-Szoltysek, Barbara
    Jarzab, Jerzy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2014, 28 (05) : 423 - 427
  • [44] Efficacy of oral olopatadine hydrochloride for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Yamamoto, Hideyuki
    Yamada, Takechiyo
    Kubo, Seita
    Osawa, Yoko
    Kimura, Yuichi
    Oh, Myonmi
    Susuki, Dai
    Takabayashi, Tetsuji
    Okamoto, Masayuki
    Fujieda, Shigeharu
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 31 (04) : 296 - 303
  • [45] Effects of Air Purifiers on Patients with Allergic Rhinitis: a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, and Placebo-Controlled Study
    Park, Kyung Hee
    Sim, Da Woon
    Lee, Sang Chul
    Moon, Sunyoung
    Choe, Eunju
    Shin, Hyejung
    Kim, Sung Ryeol
    Lee, Jae-Hyun
    Park, Hyung Ho
    Huh, Deok
    Park, Jung-Won
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 61 (08) : 689 - 697
  • [46] Impact of omalizumab on pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis: An observational study in clinical practice
    Hirano, Kojiro
    Suzaki, Isao
    Uruma, Shuhei
    Tokudome, Takatoshi
    Matuura, Shohei
    Yano, Mai
    Kobayashi, Sei
    Tanaka, Akihiko
    Hirano, Yuni
    Watanabe, Hideaki
    Kobayashi, Hitome
    INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2021, 11 (11) : 1588 - 1591
  • [47] Efficacy and safety of levocetirizine on symptoms and health-related quality of life of children with perennial allergic rhinitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial
    Potter, PC
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 95 (02) : 175 - 180
  • [48] Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of rupatadine and olopatadine in patients of allergic rhinitis: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study
    Dakhale, Ganesh
    Tathod, Yogesh
    Patel, Seema
    Pimpalkhute, Sonali
    Raghute, Latesh
    Khamkar, Ajita
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACOTHERAPEUTICS, 2016, 7 (04) : 171 - 176
  • [49] Tap water nasal irrigation in adults with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized double-blind study
    Xiong, Min
    Fu, Xiaoyan
    Deng, Wenting
    Lai, Huangwen
    Yang, Chuanhong
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 271 (06) : 1549 - 1552
  • [50] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of montelukast for treating perennial allergic rhinitis
    Patel, P
    Philip, G
    Yang, W
    Call, R
    Horak, F
    LaForce, C
    Gilles, L
    Garrett, GC
    Dass, SB
    Knorr, BA
    Reiss, TF
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 95 (06) : 551 - 557