Automated drivability: Toward an assessment of the spatial deployment of level 4 automated vehicles

被引:30
|
作者
Soteropoulos, Aggelos [1 ]
Mitteregger, Mathias [2 ]
Berger, Martin [3 ]
Zwirchmayr, Jakob [4 ]
机构
[1] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Transportat Syst Planning, Futurelab, Vienna, Austria
[2] Vienna Univ Technol, Dept Architecture & Spatial Planning, Futurelab, Vienna, Austria
[3] Vienna Univ Technol, Inst Transportat Syst Planning, Vienna, Austria
[4] TTTech Auto, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Automated vehicles; Autonomous vehicles; Operational design domain; Automated drivability; Framework; Index; WALKABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2020.03.024
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Two scenarios have shaped the discussion on the deployment of automated vehicles (AVs). The first is the revolutionary or disruptive scenario, in which a competitor would reach fully automated vehicles (level 5) in one giant leap. The second scenario renders the deployment of AVs as a lengthy process of evolutionary vehicle automation, progressing from specialized, controlled and restricted conditions, i.e. operational design domains (ODDs), to ever more complex ones. But as it becomes more and more clear that there are large uncertainties about how far in the future level 5 AVs become available, in the near future situations in which the driver is replaced completely, i.e. not requiring driver interventions, only seem feasible in specific ODDs and cities will likely be faced by highly automated vehicles (level 4) equipped with automated driving systems (ADSs) for specific ODDs over a longer period. However, cities comprise different street spaces with various conditions which lead to different requirements for the ADSs and could affect the deployment of level 4 AVs and thus the impacts of AVs in cities in the near future. This paper presents a framework and related indicators for assessing the automated drivability, i.e. the suitability of street spaces for the functioning operation of ADSs from a technical-infrastructural point of view, based on the relationship between the current technological development state of ADSs and different (urban) street spaces. Using the case study of the city of Vienna in Austria to apply the framework, a set of indicators for the different components of the framework is calculated and integrated to build an automated drivability index (ADX), illustrating the automated drivability within the street network. The results are a first step to indicate which areas are more suitable for level 4 AVs from a technological point of view, as well as areas where a deployment of AVs would only be possible after larger adjustments of the infrastructure or at considerably lower than intended speeds; thus, detailing the complexity of driving urban street spaces in a yet unprecedented level. Besides other aspects this can give hints for policy makers and other stakeholders where to facilitate the deployment of AVs.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 84
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A lack of meaningful human control for automated vehicles: pressing issues for deployment and regulation
    Calvert, Simeon C.
    Zgonnikov, Arkady
    FRONTIERS IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION, 2025, 6
  • [32] Life Cycle Assessment of Connected and Automated Vehicles: Sensing and Computing Subsystem and Vehicle Level Effects
    Gawron, James H.
    Keoleian, Gregory A.
    De Kleine, Robert D.
    Wallington, Timothy J.
    Kim, Hyung Chul
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (05) : 3249 - 3256
  • [33] A risk assessment of automated treatment planning and recommendations for clinical deployment
    Kisling, Kelly
    Johnson, Jennifer L.
    Simonds, Hannah
    Zhang, Lifei
    Jhingran, Anuja
    Beadle, Beth M.
    Burger, Hester
    du Toit, Monique
    Joubert, Nanette
    Makufa, Remigio
    Shaw, William
    Trauernicht, Christoph
    Balter, Peter
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Schmeler, Kathleen
    Court, Laurence
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : 2567 - 2574
  • [34] The deployment of automated vehicles in urban transport systems: a methodology to design dedicated zones
    Conceicao, Ligia
    Correia, Goncalo
    Tavares, Jose Pedro
    20TH EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION MEETING, EWGT 2017, 2017, 27 : 230 - 237
  • [35] Corridor level cooperative trajectory optimization with connected and automated vehicles
    Yu, Chunhui
    Feng, Yiheng
    Liu, Henry X.
    Ma, Wanjing
    Yang, Xiaoguang
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 105 : 405 - 421
  • [36] Takeover Safety Evaluation Model for Level 3 Automated Vehicles
    Lin Q.
    Wang Z.
    Lu G.
    Qiche Gongcheng/Automotive Engineering, 2019, 41 (11): : 1258 - 1264
  • [37] Development of a Model-Based Drive-By-Wire System for Level 4 Automated Vehicles
    Perrin, Jackson
    Gankov, Stanislav
    Downing, Walter, Jr.
    Rengarajan, Sankar
    Hotz, Scott
    Bhagdikar, Piyush
    Alden, Joshua
    2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, SYSCON, 2023,
  • [38] Impact of Level 4 Automated Vehicles on Mode Choice Using a Needs-Based Approach
    Zhijian, Chen
    Ying-En, Ge
    Liu, Shikun
    Qiu, Jiandong
    Zhang, Jingke
    Kang, Jing
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2024, 2024
  • [39] Human Factors Considerations for the Design of Level 2 and Level 3 Automated Vehicles
    Creaser, Janet I.
    Fitch, Gregory M.
    Road Vehicle Automation 2, 2015, : 81 - 89
  • [40] Toward Human-Vehicle Collaboration for Automated Vehicles: A Review and Perspective
    Huang, Tao
    Fu, Rui
    Sun, Qinyu
    Deng, Zejian
    Huang, Shucheng
    Jin, Lisheng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2025,