Trade liberalization, antidumping, and safeguards: Evidence from India's tariff reform

被引:60
|
作者
Bown, Chad P. [1 ]
Tovar, Patricia [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, Trade & Int Integrat, Dev Res Grp, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[2] Brandeis Univ, Int Business Sch, Waltham, MA 02454 USA
[3] Brandeis Univ, Dept Econ, Waltham, MA 02454 USA
关键词
India; Tariff reform; Antidumping; Safeguards; Political economy; ENDOGENOUS PROTECTION; DEMAND ELASTICITIES; OECD COUNTRIES; SALE; POLICY; DETERMINANTS; RETALIATION; AGREEMENTS; FILINGS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.06.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper is the first to use product-level data to examine empirically whether countries use antidumping and safeguard exceptions to unwind commitments to lower tariffs in the face of domestic political-economic pressure. We focus on the case of India, a country that underwent a major exogenous tariff reform program in the early 1990s and subsequently initiated substantial use of safeguard and antidumping import restrictions. We first estimate structural determinants of India's import protection using the Grossman and Helpman (1994) model and provide evidence from its pre-reform tariff data of 1990 that is consistent with the theory. We then re-estimate the model on the Indian tariff data after the trade liberalization is complete and find that the model no longer fits, a result consistent with theory and evidence provided in other settings that India's 1991-1992 IMF arrangement can be interpreted as resulting in an exogenous shock to India's tariff policy. However, when we re-estimate the model on data from 2000-2002 that more completely reflects India's cross-product variation in import protection by including both its post-reform tariffs and its additional non-tariff barriers of antidumping and safeguard import protection, the significance of the Grossman and Helpman model determinant estimates is restored. We interpret these combined results as evidence that India unwound its commitment to reduce tariffs through use of antidumping and safeguard protection in the face of political-economic pressure.The estimates are also economically important and provide one explanation for separate results in the literature that the magnitude of import reduction associated with India's use of antidumping is similar to the initial import expansion associated with its tariff reform. Finally, we interpret the implications of our results for the burgeoning research literature examining the effects of liberalization on India's micro-level development. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 125
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental Effects of Trade Liberalization-Evidence from China's Pilot Free Trade Zone
    Wang, Lianghu
    Wang, Zhao
    Ma, Yatian
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2021, 12 (03)
  • [42] Trade liberalization and nutrition transition: Evidence from China
    Tian, Xu
    Lin, Faqin
    ECONOMICS & HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2023, 51
  • [43] Trade liberalization and markups: Micro evidence from China
    Fan, Haichao
    Gao, Xiang
    Li, Yao Amber
    Tuan Anh Luong
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2018, 46 (01) : 103 - 130
  • [44] Trade Liberalization and Mortality: Evidence from US Counties
    Pierce, Justin R.
    Schott, Peter K.
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW-INSIGHTS, 2020, 2 (01) : 47 - 63
  • [45] The politics of financial development: Evidence from trade liberalization
    Braun, Matias
    Raddatz, Claudio
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2008, 63 (03): : 1469 - 1508
  • [47] Trade liberalization and informality nexus: Evidence from Pakistan
    Wu, Mengyun
    Ul-Haq, Jabbar
    Zafar, Naeem Uz
    Sun, Huaping
    Jiang, Jingyu
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 28 (06): : 732 - 754
  • [48] Trade liberalization and industrial concentration: Evidence from Brazil
    Ferreira, Pedro Cavalcanti
    Facchini, Giovanni
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2005, 45 (2-3): : 432 - 446
  • [49] Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Korea
    Jang, Yong Joon
    Cho, Mee Jin
    Kim, Han-Sung
    JOURNAL OF KOREA TRADE, 2015, 19 (04): : 21 - 41
  • [50] Trade liberalization and wage inequality: Evidence from Korea
    Cheong, Juyoung
    Jung, SeEun
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2021, 72