Smartphone Activation of Citizen Responders to Facilitate Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

被引:132
|
作者
Andelius, Linn [1 ]
Hansen, Carolina Malta [1 ,2 ]
Lippert, Freddy K. [1 ]
Karlsson, Lena [1 ,2 ]
Torp-Pedersen, Christian [3 ,4 ]
Ersboll, Annette Kjaer [5 ]
Kober, Lars [6 ]
Christensen, Helle Collatz [1 ]
Blomberg, Stig Nikolaj [1 ]
Gislason, Gunnar H. [2 ]
Folke, Fredrik [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen Emergency Med Serv, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Herlev & Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Hellerup, Denmark
[3] Nordsjaellands Hosp, Dept Cardiol & Clin Res, Hillerod, Denmark
[4] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Aalborg, Denmark
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Natl Inst Publ Hlth, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Cardiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
AED; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; citizen responder; OHCA; smartphone app; volunteer; LOCAL LAY RESCUERS; TRAINED VOLUNTEERS; SURVIVAL; BYSTANDERS; DISPATCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.073
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Dispatching citizen responders through a smartphone application (app) holds the potential to increase bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). OBJECTIVES This study investigated arrival at the OHCA location of app-dispatched citizen responders before the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and the association with bystander CPR and bystander defibrillation. METHODS Suspected OHCAs with alerted citizen responders from September 1, 2017, to August 31, 2018, were included. Citizen responders located 1.8 km (1.1 miles) from the OHCA were dispatched to start CPR or retrieve an automated external defibrillator. OHCAs where at least 1 citizen responder arrived before EMS were compared with OHCAs where EMS arrived first. In both groups, random bystanders could be present before the arrival of citizen responders and the EMS. Primary outcomes were bystander CPR and bystander defibrillation, which included CPR and defibrillation by citizen responders and random bystanders. RESULTS Citizen responders were alerted in 819 suspected OHCAs, of which 438 (53.5%) were confirmed cardiac arrests eligible for inclusion. At least 1 citizen responder arrived before EMS in 42.0% (n = 184) of all included OHCAs. When citizen responders arrived before EMS, the odds for bystander CPR increased (odds ratio: 1.76; 95% confidence interval: 1.07 to 2.91; p = 0.027) and the odds for bystander defibrillation more than tripled (odds ratio: 3.73; 95% confidence interval: 2.04 to 6.84; p < 0.001) compared with OHCAs in which citizen responders arrived after EMS. CONCLUSIONS Arrival of app-dispatched citizen responders before EMS was associated with increased odds for bystander CPR and a more than 3-fold increase in odds for bystander defibrillation. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 53
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Commerford, P. J.
    CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL OF AFRICA, 2016, 27 (05) : 275 - 275
  • [42] Bystander Defibrillation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Public vs Residential Locations
    Hansen, Steen Moller
    Hansen, Carolina Malta
    Folke, Fredrik
    Rajan, Shahzleen
    Kragholm, Kristian
    Ejlskov, Linda
    Gislason, Gunnar
    Kober, Lars
    Gerds, Thomas A.
    Hjortshoj, Soren
    Lippert, Freddy
    Torp-Pedersen, Christian
    Wissenberg, Mads
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (05) : 507 - 514
  • [43] Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Hallstrom, AP
    Ornato, JP
    Weisfeldt, M
    Travers, A
    Christenson, J
    McBurnie, MA
    Zalenski, R
    Becker, LB
    Schron, EB
    Proschan, M
    Vijayaraghavan, K
    Mattioni, T
    Williams, C
    Anton, AR
    Jones, CD
    Yahn, S
    Rabel, D
    O'Connor, RE
    McGraw, P
    Bollinger, M
    Megargel, RE
    Craven, RA
    Bosken, LA
    Burke, MP
    Paulsen, J
    Newton, G
    Mahoney, BD
    Knudson-Ballard, R
    Vasquez, G
    Groh, WJ
    Cordes, D
    Bondurant, SJ
    Mann, NC
    Shaum, B
    Brown, K
    Jacobsen, K
    Aufderheide, TP
    Pirrallo, RG
    Conrad, CJ
    Kitscha, DJ
    Sparks, CW
    von Briesen, C
    Deja, KA
    LeStarge, MM
    Janisch, RW
    Schmidt, SS
    Parmenter, L
    Grabowski, L
    Ehrlich, S
    Haynes, B
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (07): : 637 - 646
  • [44] Value of pulsed biphasic defibrillation shocks for the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Lejeune, C.
    Fontaine, G.
    Valance, A.
    Frey, J.
    Jekova, I.
    Didon, J. P.
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 22 (01) : 83 - 83
  • [45] Predicting defibrillation success by 'genetic' programming in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Podbregar, M
    Kovacic, M
    Podbregar-Mars, A
    Brezocnik, M
    RESUSCITATION, 2003, 57 (02) : 153 - 159
  • [46] Biphasic versus monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
    Faddy, Steven C.
    Jennings, Paul A.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (02):
  • [47] Improving bystander defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Capability, opportunity and motivation
    Smith, Christopher M.
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    RESUSCITATION, 2018, 124 : A15 - A16
  • [49] Manual Versus Semiautomatic Rhythm Analysis and Defibrillation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
    Nehme, Ziad
    Andrew, Emily
    Nair, Resmi
    Bernard, Stephen
    Smith, Karen
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2017, 10 (07):
  • [50] Is 80% a Reasonable Minimal Goal for Defibrillation Efficacy of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest ?
    Didon, Jean-Philippe
    Menetre, Sarah
    Ha, Vivien Hong Tuan
    Derkenne, Clement
    Frattini, Benoit
    Jost, Daniel
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150