Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies

被引:14
|
作者
Srikandarajah, Nisaharan [1 ]
Noble, Adam [2 ]
Clark, Simon [3 ]
Wilby, Martin [3 ]
Freeman, Brian J. C. [4 ]
Fehlings, Michael G. [5 ,6 ]
Williamson, Paula R. [7 ]
Marson, Tony [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Inst Translat Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Populat Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Walton Ctr NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Spinal Surg, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[4] Univ Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Spinal Surg, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Div Neurosurg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Spine Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Liverpool, Inst Translat Med, MRC North West Hub Trials Methodol Res, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
HERNIATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0225907
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is an emergency condition that requires acute intervention and can lead to permanent neurological deficit in working age adults. A Core Outcome Set (COS) is the minimum set of outcomes that should be reported by a research study within a specific disease area. There is significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting for CES, which does not allow data synthesis between studies. The hypothesis is that a COS for CES can be developed for future research studies using patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) as key stakeholders. Methods and findings Qualitative semi-structured interviews with CES patients were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using NVivo to identify the outcomes of importance. These were combined with the outcomes obtained from a published systematic literature review of CES patients. The outcomes were grouped into a list of 37, for rating through two rounds of an international Delphi survey according to pre-set criteria. The Delphi survey had an overall response rate of 63% and included 172 participants (104 patients, 68 HCPs) from 14 countries who completed both rounds. Thirteen outcomes reached consensus at the end of the Delphi survey and there was no attrition bias detected. The results were discussed at an international consensus meeting attended by 34 key stakeholders (16 patients and 18 HCPs) from 8 countries. A further three outcomes were agreed to be included. There was no selection bias detected at the consensus meeting. There are 16 outcomes in total in the CESCOS. Discussion This is the first study in the literature that has determined the core outcomes in CES using a transparent international consensus process involving healthcare professionals and CES patients as key stakeholders. This COS is recommended as the most important outcomes to be reported in any research study investigating CES outcomes and will allow evidence synthesis in CES.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] International consensus is needed on a core outcome set to advance the evidence of best practice in cancer prehabilitation services and research
    Myers, Anna M.
    Barlow, Rachael C.
    Baldini, Gabriele
    Campbell, Anna M.
    Carli, Franco
    Carr, Esther J.
    Collyer, Tom
    Danjoux, Gerard
    Davis, June F.
    Denehy, Linda
    Durrand, James
    Gillis, Chelsia
    Greenfield, Diana M.
    Griffiths, Stuart P.
    Grocott, Mike
    Humphreys, Liam
    Jack, Sandy
    Keen, Carol
    Levett, Denny Z. H.
    Merchant, Zoe
    Moore, John
    Moug, Susan
    Ricketts, William
    Santa Mina, Daniel
    Saxton, John M.
    Shaw, Clare E.
    Tew, Garry A.
    Thelwell, Michael
    West, Malcolm A.
    Copeland, Robert J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 132 (05) : 851 - 856
  • [22] Development of a core outcome set for use in research evaluations of interventions for venous leg ulceration: International eDelphi consensus
    Hallas, Sarah
    Nelson, E. Andrea
    O'Meara, Susan
    Gethin, Georgina
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE VIABILITY, 2024, 33 (02) : 324 - 331
  • [23] A Successful Outcome Despite Delayed Intervention for Cauda Equina Syndrome in a Young Patient with a Posterior Epidural Disc Extrusion
    Mugge, Luke
    Caras, Andrew
    Miller, William
    Buehler, Mark
    Medhkour, Azedine
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [24] A Summary of the Meetings of the Development of a Core Outcome Set for Therapeutic Studies in Eosinophilic Esophagitis (COREOS) International Multidisciplinary Consensus
    Ma, Christopher
    Schoepfer, Alain M.
    Safroneeva, Ekaterina
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 161 (03) : 778 - 784
  • [25] Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for studies on centralisation of healthcare services
    Pfisterer-Heise, Stefanie
    Scharfe, Julia
    Kugler, Charlotte Mareike
    Shehu, Eni
    Wolf, Tobias
    Mathes, Tim
    Pieper, Dawid
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [26] Update and European consensus on a patient-centered core outcome set for multiple myeloma in clinical practice and research
    Oerlemans, Simone
    de Rooij, Belle H.
    Bennink, Christine
    Bullinger, Lars
    Broijl, Annemiek
    D'Agostino, Mattia
    Laane, Edward
    Lupo-Stanghellini, Maria Teresa
    Perrot, Aurore
    Wester, Ruth
    Cursaru, Viorica
    Scheurer, Hans
    Vesseur, Jan
    Dalal, Mehul
    Sen, Rohini
    Stamm, Tanja
    Ludwig, Heinz
    Sonneveld, Pieter
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2024, 109 (06) : 1956 - 1959
  • [27] A core outcome set for clinical trials of chemoradiotherapy interventions for anal cancer (CORMAC): a patient and health-care professional consensus
    Fish, Rebecca
    Sanders, Caroline
    Adams, Richard
    Brewer, Julie
    Brookes, Sara T.
    DeNardo, Jill
    Kochhar, Rohit
    Saunders, Mark P.
    Sebag-Montefiore, David
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Renehan, Andrew G.
    LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 3 (12): : 865 - 873
  • [28] A Core Outcome Set for Seamless, Standardized Evaluation of Innovative Surgical Procedures and Devices (COHESIVE) A Patient and Professional Stakeholder Consensus Study
    Avery, Kerry N. L.
    Wilson, Nicholas
    Macefield, Rhiannon
    McNair, Angus
    Hoffmann, Christin
    Blazeby, Jane M.
    Potter, Shelley
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2023, 277 (02) : 238 - 245
  • [29] Core outcome set for research studies evaluating treatments for twin-twin transfusion syndrome
    Perry, H.
    Duffy, J. M. N.
    Reed, K.
    Baschat, A.
    Deprest, J.
    Hecher, K.
    Lewi, L.
    Lopriore, E.
    Oepkes, D.
    Khalil, A.
    Coroyannakis, Christina
    Duffy, Donovan
    Giallongo, Elisa
    Turier, Helen
    Toms, Joseph
    Lundie, Karen
    Paramanantham, Kujan
    Burton, Luke
    Windsor, Sophie
    Francis, Sijo
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 54 (02) : 255 - 261
  • [30] Developing a Core Outcome Set for Netherton Syndrome: An International Multi-Stakeholder e-Delphi Consensus Study
    Nouwen, Anouk E. M.
    Ragamin, Aviel
    Knol, Maria J.
    Ott, Hagen
    Weibel, Lisa
    Has, Cristina
    Hovnanian, Alain
    Paller, Amy S.
    Bodemer, Christine
    Dalm, Virgil A. S. H.
    Pasmans, Suzanne G. M. A.
    Schappin, Renske
    Netherton Syndrome Core Outcomes Res Evaluation NSCORE Stakeholders
    DERMATOLOGY, 2025, 241 (01) : 35 - 48