共 50 条
Treatment of Surgical Scars With Combination Pulsed Dye and Fractional Nonablative Laser A Randomized Controlled Trial
被引:6
|作者:
Kang, Bianca Y. Y.
[1
]
Ibrahim, Sarah A. A.
[1
]
Weil, Alexandra
[1
]
Reynolds, Kelly A. A.
[1
]
Johnson, Tyler
[1
]
Wilson, Sarah
[1
]
Lee, Ming H. H.
[1
]
Kim, John Y. S.
[2
]
Dirr, McKenzie A. A.
[1
]
Poon, Emily
[1
]
Alam, Murad
[1
,3
,4
,5
]
机构:
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Chicago, IL 60208 USA
[2] Northwestern Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Chicago, IL 60208 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60208 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Med Social Sci, Chicago, IL 60208 USA
关键词:
combination;
control;
dye;
fractional;
laser;
nonablative;
pulsed;
randomized;
scar;
surgical;
treatment;
trial;
PHOTOTHERMOLYSIS;
D O I:
10.1097/SLA.0000000000005377
中图分类号:
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Objective:To assess the effectiveness and safety of combined pulsed-dye laser (PDL) and NAFL for treatment of surgical scars. Summary Background Data:PDL and NAFL have not been compared to healing by time alone. Methods:Randomized controlled, single-blinded clinical trial at an urban, university hospital. Healthy adults' status post skin surgery with primary closure were randomized to either 3 sessions of combination PDL and NAFL every 2 to 8 weeks, or control of no treatment. At baseline and 36-week follow-up, Patient and observer Scar Assessment Scale and Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating were completed by participants and blinded physicians. The primary outcome was scar improvement, as measured by the score difference over time. Results:Of 76 participants, 52 completed the study (July 2017 to June 2019). No severe adverse events were reported. Patient and observer Scar Assessment Scale assessments demonstrated improvement in total score in the laser group compared to controls, as reported by patients [mean difference (standard deviation), laser: 12.86 (6.91) vs control: 7.25 (6.34); P = 0.004] and blinded physicians [18.32 (8.69) vs 13.08 (9.63); P = 0.044]. Patients observed a greater improvement in scar thickness [3.68 (2.04) vs 1.88 (1.85); P = 0.002] and stiffness [3.57 (2.78) vs 1.50 (2.11); P = 0.004] with lasers, and physicians reported greater improvement in vascularity [3.71 (1.98) vs 1.71 (1.52); P = 0.0002]. The live Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating subscore for erythema improved significantly with lasers [1.04 (0.79) vs 0.42 (0.50); P = 0.001]. Conclusions and Relevance:Combined PDL and NAFL resulted in scar improvement. Scar thickness, stiffness, and erythema were improved.
引用
收藏
页码:975 / 980
页数:6
相关论文